If Democrats get their way, say goodbye to “high capacity magazines”… and a whole slew of guns that are currently legal.

And this time, it’s not just in far left, rogue states like the People’s Republic of Connecticut and California.

The Washington state House Committee on Civil Rights and Judiciary voted to move two pieces of legislation out of committee and onto the House floor for further consideration.

Read: Officer On Gun Control: I WILL NOT COMPLY

House Bill 1068 was sponsored by Representative Javier Valdez (D-46) and was filed at the request of Attorney General Bob Ferguson. It passed the committee by a vote of 9-6.

If passed and signed into law, this bill would ban the purchase, sell or transfer of high-capacity magazines, which they define as any device that can accommodate more than 10 rounds.

The bill does “grandfather” individuals who lawfully possess said magazines prior to the date on which the law is enacted.

The bill also seeks to limit the usage of high-capacity magazines by those who lawfully possess them. These magazines must be possessed “only on property owned or immediately controlled by the person, or while engaged in lawful use at a duly licensed firing range, or while engaged in lawful outdoor recreational activities, such as hunting, or while traveling to and from these locations…provided that the high-capacity magazine is stored unloaded and in a separate, locked container during transport”.

House Bill 1225 was sponsored by Representative Laurie Jenkins(D-27). This bill would require law enforcement to seize firearms and ammunition when they are called to the scene of an alleged domestic violence incident and hold them for at least 5 days.

In what would seemingly be a complete violation of due process, this bill would also require the owner to go through the process of having to get their property back.

Read: It’s Time for All Police to Leave Los Angeles

Pursuant to RCW 9.41.345, the owner must go through a process in which the confiscating authority must determine that the owner is eligible to maintain possession of the property.

All documentation regarding the confiscated weapons then be turned over to a judge for review. This documentation is created by separating the alleged victim and the alleged suspect.

Law enforcement will then ask the victim whether the suspect has a concealed carry license, where the weapons and ammunition are in the residence and if he or she has access to other firearms stored in a different location. The law enforcement official can confiscate all firearms and ammunition on the premises and can request to take possession of any items stored at a different location. 

Similar legislation has been shot down in the past in Connecticut, of all places, where groups argued this could lead to racial profiling and bias.

The committee also acted on House Bill 1739, rescheduling this vote until next week. This bill, also sponsored by Representative Valdez at the request of the Attorney General, would end a person’s ability to manufacture firearms for personal use.

It also contains provisions that create further addressing of federal laws that bans undetectable firearms. The bill defines ‘undetectable’ as any firearm that does not have enough trace metal to be detected by metal detector.

It’s not the only proposed legislation from Democrats this year.

Last month, they put up one of their heftiest attacks on the Second Amendment since 1994, aiming to ban 205 ‘assault weapons’ by name in 2019.

The Democrats introduced the Assault Weapon Ban of 2019 targeting the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ‘military-style’ weapons.

Guns.com listed the specifics of the bill. ‘The term “assault weapon” would be defined as a semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that included one of a list of cosmetic features that are deemed “military characteristics” such as a threaded barrel, pistol grip or folding stock.’

Is this the year we’ve been warned about?  Only time will tell – but one thing is for certain: this is just the beginning.