The following includes editorial content which is the opinion of the author, a current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.
MARSEILLE, FRANCE- The American media apparently aren’t the only ones who attempt to cover up for violent Islamic extremists. According to RAIR Foundation, an Islamic terrorist who was known to French police stabbed a father who was picking up his two children, ages three and seven from a Catholic middle school in Marseille, France.
Witnesses said the suspect shouted he was acting “in the name of Allah” while repeatedly slashing and stabbing the man, a military doctor, who sustained serious injuries. He was rushed to the hospital, where he is listed in critical condition.
French media reported the victim sustained a number of knife blows, including in the area of his throat. He was in cardiac arrest when first responders reached him. Authorities say the man was known to them for drug trafficking, and was subdued by witnesses and subsequently arrested by police.
This is when the French media began to circle the wagons, much as what is done in the United States when such an attack occurs and it doesn’t meet the narrative of a “far-right extremist.” According to RAIR, the media began to implement their typical formula of protecting Muslim extremists who kill or severely injure non-Muslims in accordance with their Islamic extremist principles.
Right out of the playbook, the media suggests the attacker is suffering from “psychological issues,” whereby shortly afterward the media released a statement noting the terrorist would be subjected to a psychological exam.
The media also engages in some clever phraseology, attempting to cover up for the ideology that is typically behind such attacks. In this case, the French media claimed the man claimed his motives were on behalf of “God” (Dieu), not “Allah,” which is what he actually said.
The media takes care to avoid educating the public, RAIR claims, in the fact that a number of verses contained in the Qur’an justify such attacks. For example, Qur’an 47:4 states: “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks. They also take steps to hide the killer’s identity.
Europe has been experiencing mass migration into the continent, with large numbers of Muslims being among them. Instead of reporting in a fair, impartial, and honest manner, instead the French media “acts as an attorney” in order to defend violent Islamic jihadists, as well as the Islamic ideology behind such attacks.
In France, such Islamic-motivated attacks have become something of a “new normal” as the country faces many of the same issues being faced by the United States, that being illegal migration. Currently France is the main destination for Muslims in Europe with Muslims now making up some 8.8% of the population.
According to Gatestone, Islam is the second-largest religion in France, however, elevates to number one if you count active practitioners.
For more on fundamental Islamic terrorists, we invite you to:
The following includes editorial content which is the opinion of the writer.
Even Osama bin Laden apparently knew that Joe Biden was an incompetent boob. This week, an Islamic scholar spoke about hundreds of thousands of documents captured by Navy SEALS from bin Laden’s compound during the assault that took his life. Those documents and letters showed bin Laden’s mindset before and after the September 11 terrorist attacks.
Contained inside those documents was an order to assassinate Barack Obama, with the head of al Qaeda calling him the “head of infidelity,” the Daily Mail reports.
The instructions specifically ordered followers not to kill then-Vice President Joe Biden, who bin Laden referred to as incompetent. Just like a terrorist Nostradamus, bin Laden predicted Biden would lead the United States “into a crisis” if he was elevated to commander in chief. A little flashback for you:
The Mail reported:
“It was previously revealed that the terrorist had urged followers to assassinate Obama as a way of disrupting the 2012 presidential election.
He also banned al Qaeda from assassinating Joe Biden because he believed the Democrat would become an incompetent president and “lead the US into a crisis” if jihadists were successful in killing Barack Obama. [prophetic]
Bin Laden penned the 48-page missive in May 2010 to an aide identified as ‘Brother Shaykh Mahmud,’ real name Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. In it, he discusses the need to direct resources away from terror attacks in other Muslim countries and instead focus on direct attacks against the U.S.
On page 36, he outlines his desire to form two hit squads—one in Pakistan and another in Afghanistan—whose job it will be to plot attacks against then-President Barack Obama and ex-CIA director David Petraeus, should they visit either country.
The Mail said that bin Laden’s reasoning for attacking Obama was:
“Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him automatically will make Biden take over the presidency for the remainder of the term, as it is the norm over there.
‘Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the US into a crisis,’” the Mail reported bin Laden as saying.
Bin Laden viewed killing Obama was a high priority, however he also had his sights set on Petraeus, then the US Commander in Afghanistan. The terrorist madman told his lieutenants at the time, according to the New York Post, that he wanted “effective operations whose impact, God willing, is bigger than that of 9/11.”
For more on the incompetence that is Joseph Robinette Biden, we invite you to:
The following contains editorial content which is the opinion of the author.
MOSCOW, RUSSIA- This is a scary time for our country, make no mistake about it, to quote the “great” Barack Obama.
We have an unhinged madman in Russian president Vladimir Putin basically threatening the use of nuclear weapons while Joe Biden takes a weekend nap in Delaware.
Not that it really makes a difference, but clearly Putin understands America is being guided by an incompetent senile old man.
With Putin clearly not in his right mind and with an arsenal of nuclear weapons at his disposal, developments which took place early Sunday morning should be of grave concern to not only Europe but the United States as well.
Fox News reports that Putin early Sunday raised alert status for his nuclear forces to the status of “special regime of combat duty” as the war in Ukraine raged for a fourth day.
That move is ominous in that it indicates Putin could indeed be of a mind to deploy nuclear weapons in retaliation for sanctions placed on the Russian regime by NATO members.
“He is right now threatening a nuclear escalation,” said former DIA intelligence officer Rebekah Koffler. “This is a veiled threat—or maybe such a veiled threat—he just met with his chief of general staff and minister of defense. He is escalating the conflict into the nuclear domain in order to deescalate—that is topple Kyiv’s regime quickly.”
At a meeting Sunday with top advisers, Fox reported, Putin said that NATO had issued “aggressive statements,” while also imposing strangling financial sanctions against not only Russia buy himself individually.
“Western countries aren’t only taking unfriendly actions against our country in the economic sphere, but top officials from leading NATO members made aggressive statements regarding our county,” the increasingly deranged Putin said in a televised statement.
Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, appearing on CBS”s “Face the Nation,” that Putin’s order amounted to an “unacceptable escalation.”
“It means that President Putin is continuing to escalate this war in a manner that is totally unacceptable and we have to continue to stem his actions in the strongest possible way,” she said.
Putin’s statement Sunday morning comes after Russian nuclear-armed ICBM launchers were reportedly filmed driving outside of Moscow on Friday night, the Gateway Pundit reported.
RT correspondent Murad Gazdiev reported that “Yars” thermonuclear-armed mobile ICBM launchers were seen and filmed driving along the ring-road outside the Russian capital.
Official sources claim that the movement of the ICBM launchers was in preparation for a Victory Day parade commemorating World War II to be held in May, however it is February. That is (clearly) over two months away.
The Yars system (known in the West as SS-29) is, according to Tass, “a Russian strategic missile system comprising a mobile or silo-based solid-propellant intercontinental ballistic missile with MIRVed (multiple independently targetable vehicle) warheads.”
According to Russia’s Defense Ministry in explaining the system said, “The fulfillment of measures for 2021 to rearm the Strategic Missile Force will help increase the share of advanced strategic missile systems and boost its nuclear deterrence capabilities,” the ministry said.
On February 19 in the days before the Ukraine attack, the Yars missile was launched during Russian strategic drills.
Putin watched the missile launch in real time along with the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko from what was described by the Kremlin as a “situation center,” the New York Post reported.
Meanwhile, with Putin flexing his muscles and threatening nuclear war, Joe Biden remains at his vacation home in Delaware, which only appears to add to the narrative that he is disengaged, weak, and sends a message to Putin that he doesn’t take the situation seriously.
Fox News reported that media communications between the White House and the media has “slowed to a crawl.” In the midst of the greatest crisis the US has faced at least since the 1961 Cuban Missile Crisis.
Tennessee Republican Sen. Bill Haggerty, in an interview with Fox News Digital at the CPAC conference in Florida, slammed the Biden administration.
“[Putin will respond only to] people that show a spine” and who stand up to an authoritarian leader, which Haggerty said the U.S. currently “is not doing at the moment under Biden’s leadership.”
“I think the thing that will be most potent to stopping the advance right now will be people that show a spine, [such as] people like [Ukrainian] President Zelensky is [doing]. The folks that show resolve,” Hagerty said.
“We’re going to [have to] increase the cost to Putin of moving against Kyiv and against the entirety of Ukraine.”
Meanwhile, Rep. Darren Issa (R-CA) accused Biden of abandoning the capital, Yahoo News reported.
‘He’s gone back to Delaware,” Issa said of Biden. “There is no weakness in the White House, he abandoned the capital,”
To which Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), a U.S. Army veteran replied, “One hundred percent.”
“When he offered to evacuate [Ukrainian President] Zelensky, Zelensky said, ‘no, I need bullets,’ so he evacuated himself to Delaware!” he said.
With all of this going on, it’s important to revisit something Law Enforcement Today reported on last year, where Biden actually signaled Putin a list of sixteen entities that would cripple our country in the event of a cyberattack by Russia. That article is referenced below.
In case you need a reminder, The Gateway Pundit, citing the Jewish Patriot offered a reminder. Of course Biden, ever clueless may have thought he was warning Putin not to target those specific assets. What he in fact did was signal to Putin exactly which targets the United States deems to be vial and therefore basically provide Putin a list of juicy targets upon which to launch a cyberattack.
“I talked about the proposition that certain critical infrastructure should be off limits to attack. Period. By cyber or any other means,” Biden said when speaking of his meeting with Putin.
“I gave [Putin] a list of…16 specific entities, 16 defined as critical infrastructure under US policy from the energy sector to our water systems,” Biden added. [emphasis added]
Would be nice to have mean tweets and the adults back in charge.
In case you missed our piece on Biden’s request that Putin not attack “16 specific entities” with cyberattacks, we invite you to:
The following contains editorial content written by a retired Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.
GENEVA, SWITZERLAND- This guy is clueless. Reports are that during Biden’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin this week, he gave the Russian president a list of 16 critical infrastructure components that are “off limits” to a Russian cyberattack.
Call us stupid, but shouldn’t that “list” have included EVERYTHING?
Fox Business tells us that the entities identified by Clueless Joe included energy, water, health care, emergency, chemical, nuclear, communications, government, defense, food, commercial facilities, IT, transportation, dams, manufacturing and financial services.
Biden’s “directive” came after Russian cyberhackers took down the Colonial Pipeline last month, leading to a crippling shortage of gasoline in the southeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States.
“We’ll find out whether we have a cybersecurity arrangement that begins to bring some order,” Biden said.
Putin however has denied any involvement by the Russian government in the recent onslaught of cyberattacks that have hit major industries across the U.S.
“Certain critical infrastructures should be off-limits to attack, period, by cyber or any other means,” Biden said.
“I gave them a list, 16 specific entities defined as critical infrastructure under U.S. policy, from the energy sector to water systems.”
President Biden says he gave Putin a list of 16 critical infrastructure elements that should be off-limits when it comes to cyberattack. They also tasked experts with figuring out a joint understanding of what is "off limits" for these cyber attacks, Biden says.
— Kylie Atwood (@kylieatwood) June 16, 2021
Hey Joe…not for nothing, but isn’t EVERYTHING critical infrastructure? Why on Earth would you provide a “list.” It should have been, “any cyberattack facilitated by a foreign state will be treated as an act of war and will be responded to in kind.” Once again, Biden leading from a position of weakness, leading from behind.
Biden continued, “So we agreed to task experts in both our countries to work on specific understandings about what’s off-limits and to follow up on specific cases that originate in other countries and in either of our countries.”
Biden also asked Putin about the cyberattack on the Colonial Pipeline.
“When I talked about the pipeline that was hit with ransomware in the United States, I looked at him and I said, ‘How would you feel if ransomware too the pipelines from your oil fields?’”
Putin responded that “it would matter.”
Biden hinted at a “governmental response” if there were any cyberattacks on any of the critical infrastructure components listed. That response is expected to include blasting a recording of Nancy Pelosi on a loop babbling on incoherently about nothing in particular.
Some questioned why Biden and Putin didn’t hold a joint news conference. Fox News contributor Joe Concha of The Hill had some ideas:
Biden avoided press conference with Putin because questions wouldn't be 'handpicked' by staff: Conchahttps://t.co/nIbv3uG3Qo
— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 17, 2021
One interesting incident that happened on Wednesday was when stodgy, angry Joe went off on of all people a DNC-run media CNN reporter who asked a rather innocuous question.
Joe Biden just SNAPPED in front of the whole world.
This is WILD.https://t.co/HskhX7TUT5
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) June 16, 2021
During the exchange, an extremely testy Biden went off on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for asking Biden a question about Putin:
“Why are you so confident [Putin] is going to change his behavior, Mr. President?” Collins asked.
Biden then turned around and snapped at Collins.
“I’m not confident I’m going to change his behavior. What the hell? What do you do all the time? When did I say I was confident? I said, I said, what I said was, let’s get it straight, I said what will change their behavior is the [unintelligible] world reacts to their behavior that diminishes their standing. I’m not confident of anything, I’m just stating the facts.”
There was apparently not a translator available to decipher what Biden just said.
Collins, however persisted, asking, “But given his past behavior has not changed, and in that press conference after sitting down with you for several hours, he denied any involvement in cyber-attacks, he downplayed human rights abuses, he even refused to say Alexei Navalny’s name, so how does that account to a constructive meeting as President Putin…”
At which point Biden cut her off, saying, “If you don’t understand that, you’re in the wrong business.”
He then left in a huff.
Later, after probably being told to by his handlers, Biden issued an “apology” of sorts:
— The Recount (@therecount) June 16, 2021
Definition of Alzheimer’s:
- Memory loss
- Forgetting the names of places and objects
- Repeating themselves regularly
- Increasing confusion and disorientation
- Problems with speech or language
- Changes in mood such as frequent mood swings, depression, and feeling increasingly anxious, frustrated or agitated [emphasis added]
The apparent coldness between Putin and Biden is a change from what Putin had said last October, when he noted (to the surprise of nobody with eyes) that Democrats and Soviet communism had a lot in common. Shocker.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.