Was it really the feds? Something massively stinks about the Patriot Front protest in Washington, DC


The following contains editorial content which is the opinion of the author. 

WASHINGTON, DC- On Saturday, there was a group of protesters who showed up unannounced in Washington, DC with credit given to a group called Patriot Front. That group is alleged to be a white supremacist group based on Texas.

What was odd about this “protest” (there were actually a few odd things) is that if you go to Patriot Front’s website, there was nary a mention about this protest.


One might think that if a white supremacist group was going to hold a rally (or protest) in Washington, DC, there might be some publicity about the event either on the group’s website or on social media. In this case, there was no mention made about the Washington, DC event. In fact, the last action mentioned occurred on July 7, 2021, in Philadelphia, PA. How weird is that?

A post on social media (not by the group) mentioned a rally taking place in the city with about 500 men with riot shields marching. There were a few things, however that caught the attention of anyone paying attention. One such person is John Cardillo.

According to Red State Nation, Cardillo is a television host, who has experience as a speaker, a commentator, and something of an analyst. Cardillo is the host of America Talks Live on Newsmax, and is an experienced law enforcement officer.

Cardillo’s bio indicates that he was once appointed as a member of Harvard Law School’s Internet Safety Technical Task Force. So, he knows of what he speaks.

A few things struck Cardillo as he saw what was unfolding with the alleged Patriot Front members in DC. They appeared to be carrying FBI weapons and equipment, and he immediately tweeted that he believed those marching to be “feds.”

One tweet, conveniently deleted by Twitter (lest you think there isn’t any type of collusion between big tech and the Deep State) was where Cardillo posted pictures of the shields being carried by the “protesters,” where he noted:

“How bad of a Fed false flag op was the “Reclaim America” nonsense in DC?

“So bad that they supplied them with clear Point Blank Warrior shields that have 2-3 month lead times and must be ordered to an agency’s specifications.”

In other words, Cardillo was saying that a white supremacist group just can’t walk into your local firearms store and buy them some Point Blank Warrior shields. Fortunately, he had a screenshot of his original, since-deleted tweet.

Red State (as well as Law Enforcement Today) were not able to find the shield on Point Blank’s website. Red State noted Point Blank said they only take custom orders.

According to Point Blank’s website, they note they are one of the first companies in the US to design and manufacture body armor, saying they are “the premier source of body armor systems in the world.”

They further note they have “long-standing relationships with the most prestigious and demanding law enforcement agencies, federal agencies and the United States Department of Defense.”

The whole thing seems rather strange. For example, beside the group’s website and the absence of any announcement of the event on mainstream social media, the group’s Gab page has shown no activity since November 27.

In this case, there is nothing…nada, zilch, zip to promote the December 4 protest in Washington, DC. Also, given the fact this is being credited toward far-right, probably pro-Trump extremists, it is odd that every participant was in fact wearing a mask, which doesn’t seem to fit with the “Trumpers hate masks” narrative.

While some people on social media laid this squarely on the feds, namely the FBI, others named the Lincoln Project, which showed in Virginia that they’re not incapable of trying to pull of a scam.

The other factor that was noted—nearly all of the participants appeared to be of the same age, size, build and so on. It doesn’t fit what has typically been noted at other pro-Trump events. Oh yeah, not to mention that they were oddly all wearing pretty much the exact same clothing. Strange.

Also odd was the fact that not one person was arrested—nobody. Liberty Bunker noted that not only were police present at the unpublicized event but they were actually walking alongside the “protesters” as they walked about the city.

One needs to look at what is typically going on in situations such as this…while they’re showing you the right hand, make sure to keep an eye on the left. What was the purpose of such a distraction?

Another rather odd factoid? The account which posted the viral video of the marchers was created just last month, and is alleged to belong to a “journalist” Sheryl Lewellen. That Twitter account showed an attractive blonde with a bio reading that she was a digital/print journo who loves avocados and owns dogs.

Unfortunately for  those who were duped, the profile phot appeared to have been created using artificial intelligence.

Apparently, the account was created to trick the mainstream media into covering the so-called “Patriot Front demonstration” in DC.

In a tweet from the now-deleted account, it read:

“This account was created with a fake name and I generated profile in order to fool journalists into promoting Patriot Front’s demonstration in Washington, D.C.”


“Conservatives will say I am an FBI agent, liberals will say that I am working in the Kremlin. In reality I am a tech-savvy activist who had a good social media marketing strategy.”

So there was indeed a demonstration which took place. Who actually facilitated the event is unknown, but there are certainly a lot of questions.

After the demonstration was over, they all left the same way they came…in rental trucks, with the DC Metro Police providing parking and traffic control for them.

All of this is of course conjecture. However it all seems just a bit too convenient, don’t you agree?

For more on strange goings on with the FBI, we invite you to:


MICHIGAN- A shocking new revelation has come about in the case of five defendants arrested in connection with an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D).

According to BuzzFeed, the federal government in the form of the FBI used at least a dozen confidential informants to infiltrate the group involved in the scheme, according to a federal court filing on Monday.

In the filing from the attorney of one of the five defendants in the case, prosecutors are being asked to release information about those twelve informants, including their relationship with the FBI as well as what role if any they played in developing the case.

The filing was among some 15 new defense motions filed by defense attorneys. Other requests are for a change in venue, motions to suppress evidence gathered in a search warrant, and a request to try at least one of the defendants separately.

Taken in totality, the filings indicate the course defense attorneys may be pursuing in the case, with at least some of them indicating they plan to pursue a defense that the FBI had “induced or persuaded” the defendants to go along with the plot.

Last October, the plot to allegedly kidnap Whitmer, one of the most dictatorial of US governors during the COVID-19 pandemic, was revealed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

The announcement that six men had been charged in an alleged kidnapping conspiracy involving Whitmer went viral. Five of the men charged—Barry Croft, Adam Fox, Daniel Harris, Kaleb Franks, and Brandon Caserta—have all pleaded not guilty and are currently being held without bail.

The sixth suspect, Ty Garbin pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate in the case last January. It is unknown if prosecutors made a plea deal with him to gain his cooperation.

The DOJ said the defendants had met over a six-month period last year, where they had developed the scheme to kidnap Whitmer from her vacation home, then removing her out of state where she would be put on “trial” for being a “tyrant.” The plot was derailed before it was executed when the DOJ arrested the alleged plotters.

In addition to the six, eight other men were charged under the state’s anti-terrorism laws for providing material support to the defendants. All but two of the defendants live in Michigan, and at least half of the defendants are members of the militant Wolverine Watchmen, a militant group which has been associated with the Three Percenters, a militia group, BuzzFeed said.

The flurry of defense motions came Monday since it was the deadline for such motions in the case.

Federal prosecutors have admitted to using informants in the case, however thus far their activities and identities have been closely held, with the exception of one who testified in March.

Thus far, the DOJ has provided ID numbers connected to 12 confidential informants, however with only one exception has refused to provide background on how they were recruited, what compensation if any they received from the FBI, where they are based or their names, according to Franks’ attorney.

The attorney, Scott Graham said that such information is vital in “preparation of a defense to the charges.”

Franks has asked for his case to be moved out of the Western District of Michigan, claiming “press coverage of (and participation in) this matter has corrupted the potential trial atmosphere to the point that Mr. Franks will be denied a fair trial in Michigan.”

In claiming media involvement in the case, Graham specifically identified a motion filed by BuzzFeed seeking to obtain access to exhibits revealed at a hearing relative to the case in January and cited the risk of “prejudice in this case based on the extensive, negative pervasive press coverage of the allegations.”

In addition to the change of venue, Graham has also requested that Franks be tried separately, primarily because he isn’t facing a bomb charge that was added to the case earlier this year.

That particular count, conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, was applied to three of the other defendants in the case, who allegedly attempted to build explosive devices or procure bomb-making materials.

Graham noted that by combining the cases, potential commentary by the government in court about that particular charge “will certainly go far in frightening jurors and eliciting emotional decisions from them.”

An attorney for Croft on Sunday filed a motion, claiming the government had provided over 5,000 duplicate files as it shared evidence, with at least 15 copies of the same audio recording. That, he said significantly increases the burden on the defense.

Croft’s attorney, Joshua Blanchard, also asked the court to exclude evidence that was secured from Croft’s Delaware home during an October search, claiming they were outside the scope of the warrant. Included in those items included a 1-kilogram silver bar, a handwritten note cipher, and “Mr. Croft’s hat.”

Apparently, Croft is allegedly known among Three Percenters of wearing a tri-corner hat much like those worn during the American Revolution.

Law Enforcement Today has previously reported on the Whitmer case and possible FBI involvement. For more on that, we invite you to:


The following contains editorial content by a retired Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.

GRAND RAPIDS, MI- Last week, the mainstream media breathlessly reported that “right wing extremists” had launched an effort to kidnap the far-left governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer.

Of course Whitmer seized on those reports, blaming President Donald Trump’s “extremist rhetoric” for inflaming people to the point where they were going to take Whitmer hostage. However, details have emerged which may derail the narrative.

The Detroit Free Press reported on a bail hearing that took place on Tuesday and buried deep inside the story is what could be considered an important piece of information, and which may actually show that the “right wing militia” was in fact led to hatch the plot at the behest of one of the FBI informants.

According to defense attorney Scott Graham, he said that it was in fact informants and undercover agents who “pushed” the others to engage in illegal activity.

“One of the most active leaders was your informant,” Graham said.

The defense attorneys contended in their arguments to release the defendants on bail that there had been no probable cause to arrest and charge the suspects, saying that they had no “operational plans to do anything,” and that they had in fact been “engaged in legal activities—including talking in encrypted group chats and practicing military exercises with lawfully owned guns,” according to Graham.

Graham said that the FBI informant who wore wires to the militia meetings acted in more than just the capacity of an undercover observer.

The question became were these militia members victims of an entrapment scheme by the FBI? Certainly that is the narrative that Graham is trying to pursue. Was the FBI trying to provoke a domestic terrorist attack as something of a false flag maneuver, and if so, why?

Clearly, it isn’t out of the realm of possibility after all we have discovered about the FBI’s complicity since 2016 in trying to take down the Trump administration. FBI Director Christopher Wray recently tried to downplay the violent, left-wing group Antifa, while trying to bolster the existence of right wing extremism.

An overwhelming majority of FBI agents are good and honorable people. The same cannot be said about their leadership, with former FBI Director James Comey and former Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe being outed as being intimately tied to the plot to undermine President Trump.

Is it too much to think that perhaps there is more to this “plot” to kidnap Whitmer than meets the eye? Probably not.

We have seen that the so-called “deep state,” the inner cabal of Washington insiders is not above trying to affect a presidential election.

The whole “Russia hoax” fiasco was perpetrated in large part by Comey and willing accomplices in the FBI, such as Peter Strzok and Lisa Paige. Was the FBI trying to manufacture an “October surprise” to influence the upcoming election? Who knows? Possible? Yes.

Still, given what we now know about the FBI and more recently the CIA, it is possible.

When the plot to allegedly kidnap Whitmer went public, the usual suspects in the mainstream DNC media jumped on the opportunity to tie it into President Trump, blaming his so-called “anti-lockdown” and “pro-militia” rhetoric for the plot, even though leaders of the group were by and large anti-Trump.

In speaking to the “plot” in Michigan, Graham offered the argument that there wasn’t in fact a plot to kidnap Whitmer, but it was more along the lines of “military wannabes” who engaged in “big talk.”

“Have you ever dealt with big talkers?” Graham asked an FBI agent during cross examination. “There’s kind of a military-wanna-be theme that runs between the militias.”

Graham was questioning FBI special agent Richard Trask about testimony that claimed a minimum of 13 so-called militia members had plotted to kidnap Whitmer from her vacation home and either leave her in the middle of Lake Michigan or take her to Wisconsin where she would be tried for treason.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Under examination, Trask was asked how the members of the militia had planned on getting Whitmer to Wisconsin.

The agent couldn’t answer the question, and could only say that there were allegedly audio recordings of the suspects saying that they were planning on taking Whitmer to another state, including Wisconsin.

Again, the agent was asked by Graham what the suspects were going to do with Whitmer after leaving her in the lake, only saying that the alleged ringleader of the group, Adam Fox had said they were going to “take her out on a boat and leave her in the middle of Lake Michigan.”

Graham represents Kaleb Franks, 26, who ended up having his bail denied on Tuesday after the judge was convinced he was a danger to society. Two other suspects, Daniel Harris, 23 and Brandon Caserta, 32, were also refused bond.

The remaining bond hearings have been scheduled for Friday, this time for Fox and Ty Garbin, 24.

The five defendants appeared in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids, where the case involving Whitmer was disclosed.

In addition, the group had also talked about kidnapping Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, he of the blackface college pictures, as well as one of the suspects—a decorated Marine—allegedly asked his co-conspirators if they wanted to kill a Maine police officer for one of his friends.

 Meantime, the defense lawyers claimed that the government has only produced small samples of conversations in the case, and said that the government has no evidence that the accused had any real plan to kidnap Whitmer.

The five men were setup in a scheme to purchase explosives and tactical gear from someone, however when they arrived FBI agents were there instead.

One of the defense attorneys, Gary Springstead, who is representing Garbin said that there is still much more evidence to be presented.

“I haven’t had a full opportunity to review all the evidence,” Springstead said. “I think my co-counsel made good pints that (the evidence presented today) is a snapshot. A lot of quick points in a big time frame. You don’t know what else is happening outside of that time frame.”

“So I’m sure in our investigation (which) we’re going to conduct ourselves, and not rely solely on the federal government to tell us what happened, we’ll try to round out that information and figure out what happened in the times that weren’t captured on tape that weren’t captured in text to put it into fuller context so we can better assess where we stand in the case.”

Springstead also spoke to using an informant in this case is troublesome, especially given the role they played.

“It’s become an issue in certain cases where the informant pushes some of the information, and the court and the government and the defense attorneys have to be leery of that,” he told reporters.

“Because their job is not to assess what the government informant wants them to do, it’s to assess the accused’s intent and what they actually planned on doing.”

Ironically, the Washington Examiner reported that Daniel Harris, 23, one of the so-called “white supremacists” who was involved with the plot, had attended a Black Lives Matter rally in June, telling the Oakland County Times that he was upset about the death of George Floyd and police violence, as reported in the Washington Post.  

Harris told the Oakland County Times: “We went to the BLM protest yesterday in Lake Orion to show our support that everyone’s voice should be heard, no matter the color on your skin. Protesting is important to me because it gives us all a voice to be heard.”

Sounds like a white supremacist to us.

Editor note: In 2020, we saw a nationwide push to “defund the police”.  While we all stood here shaking our heads wondering if these people were serious… they cut billions of dollars in funding for police officers.  And as a result, crime has skyrocketed – all while the same politicians who said “you don’t need guns, the government will protect you” continued their attacks on both our police officers and our Second Amendment rights.

And that’s exactly why we’re launching this national crowdfunding campaign as part of our efforts to help “re-fund the police”.

For those looking for a quick link to get in the fight and support the cause, click here.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Submit a Correction
Related Posts