Virginia Democrats vote down raises for police. Why? Because they said they won’t enforce unconstitutional laws.

Share:

Richmond, VA – Virginia State Senator Bill Stanley attempted unsuccessfully to amend the state budget Thursday to include a 3% pay raise to all members of Sheriff’s Departments. 

Why was it unsuccessful? Because every Democrat in the state legislature voted it down, because of, well…gun control. 

Senator Stanley went to Facebook to alert Virginians about what went down and what he was told. 

Tonight (just now) on the Senate floor, I tried to amend the state budget to give all of our men and women of Virginia’s…

Posted by Senator Bill Stanley on Thursday, February 20, 2020

Stanley explained further the Senate version of the state budget had a one-time $200 bonus for sheriff’s departments in the first year and a three-percent pay increase in the second year. He was seeking to replace the bonus with another three-percent pay increase.

“Two-hundred dollars doesn’t go very far and a lot of our sheriff’s departments, you know, the pay is very low for the job they do. We have a high attrition rate.

A lot of people leave that job to go get better paying jobs. Losing the best and the brightest and we want to make sure that we’re paying those people that are protecting us, that are keeping us safe, that are keeping us alive, and it was just appalling what went on last night,” said Stanley.

Several Facebook users commented disbelief. But Stanley was quick to point out that it actually happened.  

So, Democrats are punishing law enforcement officers for not enforcing hypothetical laws, laws that are only being discussed. Not laws that have been passed and are on the books. They are going after deputies for not enforcing ideas. 

Several Facebook users commented disbelief. But Stanley was quick to point out that it actually happened. 

“It happened. It was in public, on the Senate floor at the clerk’s desk for all to see and hear. It was neither private nor was my description of it either overstated or contrived.”

CBS 6 reported that when asked about Stanley’s account, Saslaw did not deny it.

“He didn’t lie…I said it,” Saslaw admitted. “All I said was a lot of people are upset that these people come in and say they’re not going to enforce my laws. That’s all.”

One of the comments regarding Senator Stanley’s post came from Lancaster Country Sheriff, Patrick McCranie. 

“I had a strong feeling this was going to happen. The men and women who work as deputies throughout Virginia deserved a raise. If the General Assembly wanted to leave sheriffs out, that would have been fine.

I am sorry and feel very dejected, but I will never stop fighting for our men and women. Thank you Senator Bill Stanley for trying,” wrote McCranie.

I had a strong feeling this was going to happen. The men and women who work as deputies throughout Virginia deserved a…

Posted by Sheriff Patrick McCranie on Thursday, February 20, 2020

Speaking to CBS 6 on Friday, McCranie said the post made him feel “surprise, anger, and frustration.”

McCranie said if opposition to gun control is the reason for no pay increase, they should punish the sheriffs who spoke out and not their entire staff.

“Take it out on the sheriff’s who spoke up about some of the laws that were being proposed,” said McCraine, adding he felt some of those laws were overreaching.

“If you want to take it out on anybody take it out on the sheriff’s. Do not give them a pay raise, but the men and women who work for the sheriff’s office.

The deputies, the staff, please give them a pay raise. They deserve it. They put their lives on the line each and every day to serve and protect our communities.”

So, to Saslaw’s comments about the sheriff’s from across the state refusing to comply, you may wonder where that all started. 

Let us take you back to early December. 

LET reported on a sheriff who has vowed to deputize thousands of citizens to uphold “God-given right” to bear arms… doubling down on his support for the 2nd Amendment.

“The right to bear arms—some believe that the Second Amendment gives us that right, when in fact it’s a God-given right.

If you don’t believe in God, it’s a law of nature that every creature can defend their lives from threats,” said Scott Jenkins, Sheriff of Culpeper County in Virginia.

Sheriffs, officers make bold statement on gun control: "I will not comply."
(Blue Line Firearms & Tactical)

“If the legislature decides to restrict certain weapons, I feel harms our community, I will swear in thousands of auxiliary deputies in Culpeper.

There’s no limit to the number of people I can swear in. Personally, I don’t think some of the bills that are proposed will pass, I don’t think we’re that far left in Virginia.”

Sheriff Jenkins is not alone in that sentiment. Almost half of the counties in Virginia have established themselves as 2nd Amendment Constitutional Counties. In New Mexico, 31 of the 33 counties there have done the same thing.

Constitutional counties are, in essence, the same thing as sanctuary cities. The difference being that Constitutional counties are on the right side of the law and protect our freedoms. Sanctuary cities harbor criminal immigrants.

To our knowledge, Jenkins is the first to verbalize publicly that he could and potentially would deputize thousands of law-abiding citizens.

The Sheriff took to Facebook after the Board of Supervisor’s meeting.

“Every Sheriff and Commonwealth Attorney in Virginia will see the consequences if our General Assembly passes further unnecessary gun restrictions. “Red Flag” laws without due process will create enormous conflict as well.

America has more guns than citizens and murder has long been illegal. At best, the proposed gun restrictions will disarm or handicap our law-abiding in their defense and possibly cause a criminal to choose another tool for evil.

I’d like to thank our Board of Supervisors for their resolution of support of our citizen’s natural right to self-defense as protected by our Constitutions. My office will always encourage and support our citizens in firearms training, concealed carry permits, and the ability to defend themselves and their families.

I remain very optimistic that our General Assembly will not pass the proposed bills. Obviously, if passed, there are many of us willing to challenge these laws through the courts. In addition, if necessary, I plan to properly screen and deputize thousands of our law-abiding citizens to protect their constitutional right to own firearms.”

-Sheriff Scott Jenkins

“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms.” (1788)

-Richard Henry Lee

Sheriffs, officers make bold statement on gun control: "I will not comply."
We have a problem. Sheriff Scott Jenkins has a solution. (Flickr)
 

The 7-member Board of Supervisors held an open forum meeting, where they voted unanimously to declare the county a safe-haven for law-abiding gun-owners.

“All my adult life, in the military and in local government, I’ve sworn to uphold the Constitution and I’ll be damned if any politician down in Richmond or anywhere else is going to get me to change my mind,” said Supervisor Bill Chase, a Vietnam veteran.

According to the Culpeper Star-Exponent, the overflow audience in attendance erupted in applause at this statement as Chase invited Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins to the podium to share his thoughts on the Second Amendment.

Jenkins said thousands of Culpeper citizens hold concealed carry permits, including for guns with large capacity ammunition magazines, an issue that could see attempts at legislative restriction next year.

He quoted Founding Father Richard Henry Lee, of Virginia, in further emphasizing his point:

“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms.”

Supervisor Jack Frazier, adding his support for the resolution, said,“I am hoping that by standing by our neighboring counties that this will send a message to our governor, legislators and the folks in Richmond that the people of Culpeper County know best as to how we can protect ourselves and our families.”

County Attorney Bobbi Jo Alexis drafted the two-page resolution that states, in part:

“The Board of Supervisors implores the Virginia General Assembly, the United States Congress and other agencies of the commonwealth of Virginia and the United States government to preserve, uphold and protect the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms under the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States by rejecting any provision, law or regulation that may infringe, have the tendency to infringe or place any additional burdens on the right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms.”

Not everyone in the county agrees with the decision to pass the resolution.

Donna DeAngelis said,“As a citizen of Culpeper County, I ask that you not support a resolution that would sanction gun violence,” she stated. “It is time that common sense prevails, and we all unite behind reasonably regulated, responsible, safe gun ownership.

Our forefathers in all of our wisdom could not have predicted what a single-shot musket would become almost 250 years later.”

Ah, yes, the “founding fathers could not have envisioned the AR-15 when they wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights” talking point.

In 2016, Eugene Robinson wrote an opinion piece for the Washington Post. Here is part of what he had to say:

An Islamic State sympathizer was able to go into a gun store days or weeks ago and buy both a pistol and an AR-15-style semiautomatic assault rifle, which he used to kill 49 men and women at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. Had he been armed with the pistol alone; he still would have killed people — but not so many.

Keeping military-grade combat weapons out of the hands of maniacs should not be a controversial idea.

The Second Amendment enshrines the right to keep and bear arms, and the Supreme Court has ruled that this is an individual right, not a collective one. The court has made clear, however, that this does not preclude reasonable gun control measures. Not all weapons must be considered suitable for private hands.

When the framers wrote of “arms,” they were thinking about muskets and single-shot pistols. They could not have foreseen modern rifles or high-capacity magazines.

They lived at a time when it was impossible to imagine one man barging into a crowded room and killing more than one or two people before having to reload and surely being subdued. Today it is not only imaginable but also tragically commonplace.

To both Donna and Eugene, are you both really that naïve? In 1791, when the 2nd Amendment was written, there were more than just single-shot pistols and muzzleloaders available for private ownership.

Did you know that Law Enforcement Today has a private new home for those who support emergency responders and veterans? It’s called LET Unity, and it’s where we share the untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Every penny gets reinvested into giving these heroes a voice. Check it out today.

Sheriffs, officers make bold statement on gun control: "I will not comply."

 

Ever heard of a cannon? Have you seen the type of damage those were capable of? They could create mass casualties from a much greater distance.

Yup, you guessed it. They were privately owned.

And as far as what the framers could envision, try this one on for size.

When they wrote the 2nd Amendment, which was created to allow free men to fight against a tyrannical government, they framers knew that individuals would have the same grade of weapons that a military force would have.

There was no separation between military grade and consumer grade. The framers envisioned building into our inalienable rights, the ability to fight for our freedom with equal force. Nowhere do we find evidence that our founders expected us to maintain a single shot capacity while the military might advance beyond that.  

The framers new there would be advancements, as most of them were alive when swords were a viable weapon on the battlefield.

And for the record, the first revolver was introduced less than 30 years after the 2nd Amendment was written. At that time, we did not have people screaming for a reduction in capacity or capability of weapons because the framers never envisioned a multiple-shot weapon be created.

People keep screaming for common-sense gun laws. I think we just need to have common sense. I am not seeing it in the arguments of the gun-grabbers of today.  

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Share:
Related Posts