The collapse of “gun control”: Supreme Court throws unconstitutional Mass gun law back to 1st Circuit


The following contains embedded content which is editorial in nature and which reflects the opinion of the writer. 

WASHINGTON, DC- Chalk up another win for the good guys.

On Monday, the Supreme Court vacated a controversial Massachusetts gun control law, adding on to a previous ruling that had a similar effect on a New York State gun law in June.

In that case, the high court struck down a New York law which required people to show “proper cause” if they wanted to carry a concealed gun in public.

The Massachusetts case—Morin v. Lyver—centered around a plaintiff who was blocked from getting a new firearm license due to two out-of-state misdemeanor convictions for weapons possession.

Under Massachusetts laws, which are some of the strictest in the country, people are denied firearms licenses to carry if convicted of even nonviolent misdemeanors.

Fox News reported that it also “includes a lifetime ban on purchasing handguns on anyone convicted of a nonviolent misdemeanor involving the possession or use of guns.”

The Monday ruling by the high court, one of the first of its new term, vacated a lower court ruling which ruled the Massachusetts general law constitutional. The case was sent back to the First Circuit Court of Appeals “in light” of its New York gun ruling, the New York Post reported.

The majority opinion in the New York case, which was 6-3 with all the court’s quasi-conservative majority ruling in favor, was written by Justice Clarence Thomas.

In that opinion, Thomas noted the law’s mandate that New Yorkers be forced to show “proper cause” it’s needed for self-defense in order to get a handgun permit in the Empire State, “violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms in public.”

In the case of the Massachusetts ruling, the order was unsigned and there were no dissenting justices. In sending the case back to the First Circuit, the court wrote that it be:

“…remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., v. Bruen.”

When the high court overturned the New York law, considered a landmark ruling, it is believed that may open the door to additional challenges to state laws and local ordinances placing restrictions on guns.”

The Supreme Court’s new term began on Monday with new far-left liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who famously couldn’t define what a woman is, taking her place on the court. Look for her to vote in lockstep with the other liberals on the court 100% of the time, those being Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

After the New York ruling in June, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office and the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security issued a joint advisory in order to clarify the impact on Massachusetts, WCVB reported.

The two agencies noted  that it “remains unlawful to carry a firearm in Massachusetts without a license,” noting that “The Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen did not affect, but instead expressly stated that it was constitutional, for states to require a license to carry a firearm in public.”

Police chiefs were also told they must continue to enforce the “prohibited person” and “suitability” provisions of Massachusetts license-to-carry laws.

The provision, however, that said chiefs may “no longer consider why applicants are seeking a license to carry.”

“Authorities should no longer deny, or impose restrictions on, a license to carry because the applicant lacks a sufficiently good reason to carry a firearm. An applicant who is neither a ‘prohibited person’ or ‘unsuitable’ must be issued an unrestricted license to carry,” the new guidance read.

Of course as expected, New York’s radical governor and legislature didn’t take the Supreme Court ruling lying down, and implemented a confusing new law in response. For more on that, we invite you to:


By Larry Keane and our friends at NSSF

On Thursday, Sept. 1, New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul’s new gun restrictions take effect and there’s one common feeling across the state: confusion.

The governor decried the decision when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Empire State’s subjective restrictive “may issue” concealed carry requirements. She was shocked and responded by pushing even more restrictions through the legislature.

Law-abiding gun owners have cried foul ever since, noting the gun control laws don’t hold criminals accountable and law enforcement and county officials charged with implementing and overseeing the rules have voiced concern.

First and Flawed

In Gov. Hochul’s rushed attempt to be first after the Supreme Court ruled against New York in its  Bruen decision, her antigun bias has wreaked havoc in New York.

In Upstate counties that comprise the vast majority of New York’s geography, confusion reigns. Fulton County Sheriff Richard Giardino held an information session for law-abiding gun owners.

It was jampacked with New Yorkers worried that Gov. Hochul’s gun control will ensnare them and turn them into criminals.

“We’re placed in an untenable position of enforcing laws that we might believe are unconstitutional, and as a former judge and DA, I still have my law license, I believe many provisions of this are unconstitutional and will be knocked down in the courts,” said Giardino.

In Greene County, Lisa and Richard MacLeod – owners of Recon Defense – have been swamped with calls, walk-ins and social media posts from concerned New Yorkers. “We are up to 13,00 hits on this already. Our phone has not stopped ringing. As far as what does this mean? Everyone is so confused no one knows what to do,” Lisa told local media.

New York Republican Assemblywoman Mary Beth Walsh told the New York Post, “A lot of times New York is trying to be first — the first to poke back at the US Supreme Court because they didn’t like the concealed carry ruling … So [Democrats] tried to be first and then they’re not best. It was sloppy drafting.”

The assemblywoman’s comments followed a scramble by the governor’s administration to reassure New Yorkers that prohibitions on recreational shooting sports weren’t included in the bill despite Assembly Codes Committee Chair Jeffrey Dinowitz (D-Bronx) telling Walsh the exact opposite during bill debate. “I guess that’s covered by this.”

Fighting Back

One lawmaker in Albany is leading her colleagues in their fight back and attempting to shield lawful recreational and shooting sports activities from the flawed law.

Republican N.Y. state Sen. Pam Helming introduced legislation to protect the shooting sports and to clarify the law with language to deem competitive shooting sports events, often held at sportsmen’s clubs, exempted from the state’s list of “sensitive places.”

“The language in our laws matters – and the language in the law that takes effect on September 1 unfairly puts these programs at risk,” Sen. Helming said.

“Participation in these sports is growing, especially in our rural areas. Shooting sports programs and competitions are conducted safely and responsibly, with applicable training and education and they should be allowed to operate as they always have—safely and successfully.”

Lawmakers aren’t expected back in Albany until the 2023 legislative session begins in January.

What’s Next?

 Gov. Hochul’s new gun control law is a kitchen sink of constitutionally-questionable restrictions and don’t do anything to stop criminals in her state from illegally obtaining and misusing firearms.

The law expanded the “sensitive locations” where law-abiding concealed carriers cannot carry firearms, which include federal, state and local government buildings, health and medical facilities, daycares, parks, zoos and playgrounds, public transportation including subways and buses, polling sites, schools and even publicly-utilized state forest preserves, including the 6 million acres of the Adirondack Park.

The law also allows the state to examine social media posts between neighbors to determine if an individual qualifies for a state-issued concealed carry permit. Court challenges are lining up fast.

Jane Havens, manager of Calamity Jane’s Firearms in Hudson Falls, N.Y., organized a recent townhall of her own to cover the new laws and it was attended by a few hundred people.

Her message to law-abiding gun owners and those trying to become them was short and simple. No matter how frustrating the process is: “Don’t give up this fight. We will help you.”

Firearm retailers are in a bind too. New York passed an extensive security and record keeping law that will also go into effect Sept. 1. NSSF met with the governor’s office and N.Y. State Police to obtain guidance for implementation guidance but the only thing that was clear was the state’s not ready.

NSSF was told to advise member retailers that state police won’t conduct inspections without proper guidance in place first and officials from the governor’s office didn’t want New York firearm retailers to spending their resources to comply until regulations are published.

State police informed NSSF that a Frequently Asked Questions page will be created to assist retailers soon.

The confusion wrought by Gov. Hochul has been purposeful and targeted at law-abiding gun owners and the lawful firearm industry.

New York gun owners new and old are sticking together in this fight and not giving up. The firearm industry isn’t backing down either.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
Facebook Follow First
Submit a Correction
Related Posts