States want to give driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants? They can kiss “block grant funding” goodbye.

Share:

WASHINGTON D.C.- At last Republicans are starting to stand up to this illegal immigrant sanctuary nonsense.

On Wednesday, Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) announced that she was proposing a bill to block grant funding from the Department of Justice for local law enforcement in states with sanctuary policies that allow illegal immigrants to receive drivers licenses.

“When I look at the situation, we have with immigration here in our country, I say let’s leave the system in better shape than we found it, because it’s a broken system,” Blackburn said.

She noted the passing of the Real ID Act after 9/11 as her reasoning for the additional measures.

“Now, states are beginning to really get back to where they were before 9-11, that they are going to provide these,” she said.

“And we think it is important to file legislation that would prohibit these sanctuary entities and these entities that are refusing to comply with federal immigration law, to prohibit them from receiving taxpayer dollars through the grant programs over at DOJ.”

The bill has numerous co-sponsors in the Senate, including Kevin Kramer (R-N.D), Tom Cotton (R-Ark), Joni Ertz (R-Iowa), Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga), Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.V.), and Mike Rounds (R-S.D).

The bill, called “Stop Greenlighting Drivers Licenses for Illegal Immigrants Act”, is being carried in the House by Representative Ken Buck (R-Colo).

The proposed law would ban federal funding through the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants for local law enforcement in the 13 states and the District of Columbia which currently issue drivers’ licenses to illegal aliens.

Massachusetts is currently considering such a measure, and this past Tuesday, Virginia’s legislature passed two different bills that would allow illegal aliens to get licenses in that state.

In 2017, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions proposed a similar measure to combat sanctuary policies, however, federal judges (Obama appointees, no doubt) in Pennsylvania, California, Illinois and New York all ruled against the Trump administration.

Blackburn’s announcement came the day after attorney general William Barr announced that the Trump administration was starting enforcement actions against sanctuary jurisdictions for “unconstitutionally interfering” with federal immigration enforcement.

“When we are talking about sanctuary cities, we are talking about policies that are designed to allow criminal aliens to escape,” Barr said.

“These policies are not about people who come to our country illegally but have otherwise been peaceful and productive members of society. Their express purpose is to shelter aliens whom local law enforcement has already arrested for other crimes. This is neither lawful nor sensible.”

On Wednesday, New York governor Andrew Cuomo said that his state was “reversing course” somewhat after the Trump administration announced that New Yorkers would be barred from federal fast-travel programs. This was in response to New York’s “Green Light” law—which gave illegal aliens drivers licenses and blocked DHS from accessing state DMV records.

Last week, acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf announced that due to New York’s “Green Light” law, which gives illegal aliens drivers licenses while blocking the federal government from accessing DMV records, that DHS was blocking New York residents from the program.

“The corresponding lack of security cooperation from the New York DMV requires DHS to take immediate action to ensure DHS’s efforts to protect the Homeland are not compromised,” Wolf said.

Cuomo said that he told top DHS officials in response to the announcement:

“You want access to our DMV database for trusted traveler? You can have it.”

Cuomo however stopped short of offering “unfettered access” and said that he would resist any attempt to use the registry for immigration enforcement.

Last week, we reported on the lax process for providing documentation in order to obtain a New York driver’s license. The way the law is written will serve to shield illegal aliens from being detected, and also presents some public safety dangers, as well as facilitate identity theft.

Unlike in the past where documentation used to obtain driver’s licenses had to be verifiable by a U.S. entity, the new law allows the use of documentation issued by a variety of foreign government entities.

The new law also prohibits Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from accessing New York Department of Motor Vehicles records and information. This prohibition will, in essence, disrupt the ability of CBP inspections at Ports of Entry, and also will hinder ICE and Border Patrol in conducting their daily operations.

The Green Light law specifically undermines U.S. security as follows in numerous ways. First of all, it gives illegal aliens or possibly someone with terrorist intentions a way to obtain legitimate, state-issued documents for identification.

Second, it uses information provided by foreign governments as a means of issuing New York driver’s licenses with no way to verify the information.

Third, it cuts off cooperation between the state DMV and federal agencies, who require that information for national security reasons.

Utilization of identification in the United States has become an important part of everyday life, especially in a post-9/11 world. Today, identification is required in order to perform a lot of everyday tasks.

Identification must be shown in order to accept a job, purchase a firearm, open bank accounts, enter secured areas of airports or enter the country, buy alcohol, cigarettes and lottery tickets, register at a hotel, and any number of other seemingly mundane tasks. Failure to have valid identification in many of these cases makes completing these tasks difficult, if not impossible.

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and vets called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Click to check it out.

Colorado woman uses red flag law against officer who shot and killed her knife-wielding son

Documentation requirements in the private sector are designed to detect and deter fraud, while those in the public sector are for public safety, national security, to prevent terrorism and also to prevent fraud.

Starting in January, New York started issuing “non-commercial driver’s license or learner’s permit which does not meet federal standards for identification.”

The new licenses are acceptable as identification, however, are not able to be used for “federal purposes.” Restricted activities include boarding an aircraft, entering certain government buildings, military installations, and nuclear facilities.

Document integrity is an important component of the ability to have confidence that the individual presenting the document is in fact, that person.

The information underlying that documentation is vital. The veracity of the documentation and therefore its integrity needs two key components; assurance that the identity information was authenticated prior to issuance, and trust in the entity that issued the documentation.

The Green-Light licenses fall short on both counts.

The new law in New York no longer requires that the applicant provide a valid Social Security number. All that is now required is that the applicant file an affidavit stating they do not have a Social Security number.

Currently, verification of an applicant’s SS number is the primary way used to substantiate an applicant’s identity. Using the Social Security Administration, officials can verify the validity of the number and the biographical data associated with that number.

Short of that verification, the security of the licenses is compromised.

Secondly, the law allows for the use of foreign passports, foreign driver’s licenses, and consular identification documents issued by the applicant’s country of citizenship to be used to establish identity.

Clearly, foreign documentation does not fall under the control or jurisdiction of any U.S. entity. The state is relying on the accuracy of these documents.

Further, there is no way for state officials to evaluate the integrity of the issuing countries’ application process or how they go about verifying the identity of their own citizens.

The Green Light law allows the following additional documents as “proof” of identity.

Valid, unexpired foreign passport issued by the applicant’s country of citizenship (also serves as proof of age), a valid, unexpired consular identification document issued by a consulate from the applicant’s country of citizenship, or a valid foreign driver’s license that includes a photo image of the applicant, which is unexpired or expired for less than twenty-four months of its date of expiration, as primary forms of such proof.

The Green Light law does not specify which nations documents it will accept, so it appears that all foreign nations’ documents will be allowed.

The United States currently has diplomatic with approximately 180 nations, with each nation issuing passports and some more than one. These countries also have the ability to issue consular identification cards, and of course all have driver’s licenses. Minimally, that means that there are over 540 documents that the New York DMV will accept.

Think about this for a minute. Most countries allow individual states or political subdivisions within their countries to issue driver’s licenses, just as we do in the United States.

Current estimates indicate that when all is said and done, New York will accept over 600 variations of documents in order to establish identity and get a driver’s license or identification card in New York.

The new law is so fraught with issues we literally cannot go into all of them in one writing. One scenario we will show as an example is that of consular ID cards. Under the new law, a CID can be used to obtain a New York driver’s license.

Where a bank or financial institution might balk at cashing a check when presented with only a CID, the same bank might accept the check when presented with a New York driver’s license mandated under the Green Light law.

In addition, many consular ID’s are issued in languages other than English. Many countries use alphabets that are different from the Latin alphabet used in English. There is no way for the DMV to query another nation’s record system or databases to authenticate an identity document.

Here are two scenarios, one minor and one that shows how bad this could be. These scenarios were formulated by the Center for Immigration Studies of what could go wrong:

Scenario One- Abel Bravo-Cortez is a Mexican national and lawful permanent resident of the United States, who resides in Queens, N.Y. Abel had a valid NY license under the name Abel B. Cortez, but it was suspended due to multiple, serious traffic violations.

Abel obtains a valid Mexican consular ID by showing his Mexican birth certificate. He insists that his consular ID be issued in his full name, Abel Bravo-Cortez.

Abel then applies for a Green-Light license with the slight name variation and uses a relative’s address in Albany. He provides an affidavit that he does not have a Social Security number. Abel regains a license and is back on the road.

Scenario Two- An unnamed man with an unknown date of birth and of an unknown nationality is determined to obtain a false identity. He works with a document counterfeiter.

The counterfeiter manufactures a Mexican consular ID for $400. The man assumes the name Marcos Gonzalez-Morales. Even though the document is counterfeit and its quality mediocre, the clerk at the DMV feels compelled to issue a Green-Light license based on it.

The clerk doesn’t have the skills or the training to declare it fraudulent, nor the ability to check its authenticity through a database or liaison with the Mexican government. “Marcos” uses his new identity to establish credit and open a bank account.

He helps launder drug proceeds and rents vehicles to transport narcotics. In another scenario, the new “Marcos” rents vehicles and a safe house for a cell of terrorists.”

CIS identifies some interesting consequences of the new law.

-ICE and CBP officers are considered “peace officers” under NY law. One of the so-called “tools of the trade” for peace officers is DMV information, which they will not have access to.

-Canada, a foreign nation freely shares its DMV information with CBP, and ICE. New York will not

-New York is currently advising its legal residents to upgrade their NY driver’s licenses to be compliant with the Real ID Act, at extra cost, while at the same time New York is offering illegal aliens an opportunity to obtain valid ID with no safeguards

-US magistrate judges have the authority to issue criminal arrest warrants and search warrants, however New York will exclude these officials from issuing judicial orders for DMV records.

-The NY State Liquor Authority lists NY driver’s licenses as an acceptable document to buy alcohol, however the consular ID card is listed as unacceptable. So, New York doesn’t recognize CID’s as valid for the purchase of alcohol but valid for obtaining a driver’s license?

-In 2015, the USBP was instrumental in helping capture two escaped murderers from New York’s Clinton Correctional Facility. Four years later, New York won’t share information with CBP that could save agents’ lives.

The restrictions Wolf had announced apply to Global Entry, NEXUS, the Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI) program, and the Free and Secure Trade (FAST) program. These programs currently provide expedited and preferential entry procedures to travelers who meet certain requirements.

TTPs require trust in the underlying identification program that agencies provide to DHS in administering these programs. Clearly DHS no longer trusts the New York driver’s license as a valid means of identification in securing special clearance under these programs.

In response to the move by Homeland Security, CIS Director of Policy Studies Jessica Vaughan said:

“New York’s law is the most egregious in the nation, and it creates unacceptable security and safety risks to everyone, for the sole purpose of protecting those who are living here illegally.

The Department cannot stand by and watch a state obstruct federal authority and create problems for everyone. It will be interesting to see if frequent travelers from New York are willing to be inconvenienced for the sake of illegal aliens.

This is not necessarily the last word from DHS, so other states that are considering this should take note.”

Last week, New York State announced it is suing DHS over the new policy change which eliminates New York residents from the trusted-traveler programs, including Global Entry. Since Cuomo appears to have backed down somewhat, it is not known what the status of the lawsuit is. 

Stay tuned.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Share:
Related Posts