Clinton spokesman denies, stonewalls as more questions about Clinton-Epstein connection surface

Share:

Recently released court documents have sparked a new interest in former president Bill Clinton’s association with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

According to Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre in a 2011 deposition now available to the public, Clinton visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island getaway. 

At the time Clinton was there, she said,

“orgies were a constant thing that took place.”

According to the New York Post, Giuffre testified that she asked Epstein about Clinton’s presence on the island.  She said,

“I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor.”

She continued,

“He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn’t know if he was serious. It was just a joke.”

As we previously reported, Clinton denied having been on Epstein’s island.

Clinton spokesman Angel Urena has asserted,

“The story keeps changing, the facts don’t.  The President has never been to the island.”

Although he has been long linked to Epstein, the former president has also long attempted to distance himself from the late New York financier and convicted pedopile.

In 2019, Clinton spokesman Angel Urena denied Clinton knew about Epstein’s “terrible crimes.” 

Urena claimed Clinton had

“never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.”

Apparently implying that time away from Epstein released Clinton from scrutiny, Urena also stated,

“[Clinton has] not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade.”

Urena continued the denial by citing limited travel by Clinton on Epstein’s plane in 2002 and 2003.

Urena claimed, specifically,

“In 2002 and 2003, President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane:  one to Europe, one to Asia, and two to Africa… Staff, supporters of the [Clinton] Foundation, and his Secret Service detail traveled on every leg of the trip.”

However, in 2019, the Washington Examiner reported different information it gleaned from FAA flight logs.

Clinton apparently took at least six trips on Epstein’s Lolita Express, not four as Urena had claimed.   Clinton flew at least 27 times on that plane.

Clinton was listed on trips to “Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, China, Brunei, London, New York, the Azores, Belgium, Norway, Russia and Africa.”

As if Urena’s denial of the documented numbers of trips isn’t enough to raise eyebrows, the matter of Secret Service protection, or lack thereof, has come under scrutiny.

Donald Trump, Jr. raised a valid point when he asked in a recent tweet,

“Retweet if you’re curious as I’m about why Bill Clinton apparently signed off from Secret Service protection for some of those Epstein island trips?

“I keep reading that but I wonder why he would do that for those trips.  I’m sure there are great reasons.”

As it turns out, Fox News found that on at least one occasion in 2002, on a five-leg trip to Asia, flight logs do not list any Secret Service agents.  Clinton would have had specifically had to file a form declining Secret Service protection.

Fox News made FOIA requests to the Secret Service to obtain more information on Clinton’s travels and USSS accompaniment, with no answers from the USSS.

Fox News also stated,

“In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.”

In 2019, the Washington Examiner also reported an additional trip apparently without Secret Service protection, this one from Miami, FL to Westchester, NY.

As one would expect, Clinton spokesman Angel Urena took exception to Don Jr.’s tweet and responded,

“To: @DonaldTrumpJr

Re: your latest loony tweet

You guys read your memos, right?

USSS publicly refuted this a year ago (see below)”

Urena referred to an older tweet which stated,

“a spokesperson for the USSS says President Clinton has never declined protection and has always been accompanied by his detail.”

There’s a bit of a problem with Urena’s reference, however. 

According to a 2019 article in the Washington Examiner on Clinton’s flights on the Lolita Express, a Secret Service spokesperson did say,

“Former President Clinton has never declined Secret Service protection.”

However, the Examiner also reported,

“The spokesperson did not answer detailed Washington Examiner questions about why the Epstein flight records indicated that Clinton was not accompanied by Secret Service on two 2002 trips — one in Asia and one in Africa.”

It is interesting to think that Clinton would decline Secret Service protection for travel, especially overseas to Asia.  It is also interesting that the USSS would decline to answer FOIA requests from Fox and the Examiner on their presence or absence during Clinton’s travels on Epstein’s jet.

Given Angel Urena’s poor record on sharing the truth when it comes to Clinton’s dealings with Epstein, it is highly doubtful that the Clinton spokesman will clear up the questions on Clinton’s Secret Service protection.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Here is more on Clinton’s association with Epstein:

On the July 31st edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily with host Alex Marlow, Mike Cernovich, author, journalist, and producer of Hoaxed, stated The FBI “completely ignored” requests for help from victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual predation.

According to Breitbart, Cernovich discussed the newly released court documents, which were released on July 30th, in which former President Bill Clinton was linked to Epstein.

He wrote:

“Jeffrey Epstein hosted Bill Clinton on private island: court docs”

 

He continued:

“I think that when you go through these files in detail as I have, you’re really looking at the FBI and wondering what exactly was the FBI’s role in all of this stuff with Epstein.”

Cernovich discussed the fact that the FBI is involved in political corruption, similar to the way that most major news outlets are. It seems at though much like the news, the FBI is selective with what they want to investigate or report, depending on who is involved. 

Cernovich determined:

“It’s absolutely Deep State,

“It’s, in a way, heartbreaking to see the FBI ignore these women who are asking them, ‘I need to take action. I need to do something. Do you have any files? Can we talk completely?’”

Cernovich continued:

“The FBI had that picture of Prince Andrew as far back as 2011. The FBI never demanded Prince Andrew be interviewed. They covered that up. So when I read this, I see an FBI that either ignores victims of human trafficking to protect powerful Democrats or they’re complicit in it and they’re taking more active measures. I don’t know how to know how you read these files and think, ‘I would go to the FBI about anything.’”

It is evident that news media has broadly ignore and suppress revelations related to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Cernovich concluded:

“It’s stunning that post-Me Too, we’re still in a Juanita Broaddrick era where the media will actively cover up misconduct by powerful Democrats,

  “We see it in real time now.”

Clinton, for his part, denied having been on the island.

It will be interesting to see if and how the news media will cover the newly released Epstein documents, now that Democratic politicians are implicated. 

Former Clinton aide to Biden: “Whatever you do, don’t debate Trump!”

WASHINGTON DC – Joe Lockhart, a former aide to Bill Clinton wrote an Op-Ed piece for CNN last week in which he told the presidential hopeful and the world,

“Whatever you do, don’t debate Trump”

Lockhart, now a political analyst for CNN stated:

“Trump is incapable of telling the truth.”

To keep things in perspective, Lockhart also blamed MLB players kneeling during the national anthem on Donald Trump.

Presidential hopeful Joe Biden should be afraid to debate Trump though. Biden has a very hard time even remembering where he is when he is giving a speech so how can Biden debating Trump help him win the white house?

The Daily Wire host Michael Knowles has put together a couple of recent gaffes of Joe Biden and that should tell the American people all they need to know about the dems savior to unseat Donald Trump.

In the first clip, Biden is welcoming the crowd to a place down the street from where he actually was. Worse than that was that he tried to play it off as a joke, even though he looked confused while telling people he was joking.

 

We only have to go back to July when Joe Biden told progressive activist and leader of The Fed Up movement, Ady Barkan the police were, “’the enemy’”. This was in response….sort of to Barkan asking Biden about de-funding the police. Biden went on a tangent discussing the use of military surplus equipment by local police departments. He also called the police an “invading army”.

The entire interview can been seen on Barkan’s Twitter below.

Then later in July Joe Biden was telling Americans that it was Trump who wanted to de-fund the police.

Biden claims that President Trump wants to defund the police. That’s a lie, and here’s the proof. (Op-ed)

So of course Biden should not debate President Trump, not because of President Trump’s inability to tell the truth. Biden should steer clear of a debate against anyone because he does not know where he is on any given time. He also has a history of his own missteps that have been the root of political satire in America for years now.

Last year the Daily Wire published a satirical story mocking the democratic presidential candidate. From July of 2019;

“Biden explained to a group of voters that ‘poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.’ Biden quickly clarified the remark, saying it was just a gaffe that accidentally revealed his underlying disdain for African Americans.

He then explained the clarification, saying it was just a gaffe because it accidentally revealed what the first gaffe accidentally revealed when he had meant to disguise what the first gaffe accidentally revealed with the second gaffe which he had intended not as a gaffe but as a cover-up.

Biden then clarified the explanation of the clarification saying that it was a gaffe because he hadn’t meant to reveal that it was a cover-up but had instead meant to cover that up.”

We as a country need to be able to see through the agendas that the left is pushing and be able to look at facts when going to the polls this year.

Biden claims that President Trump wants to defund the police. That’s a lie, and here’s the proof. (Op-ed)

Apparently, Joe Biden has been claiming that it’s not him that wants to defund police, but that President Donald Trump wants to defund police. Those are some pretty outrageous claims, especially given Trump’s public display of support for law enforcement.

But the question is: Do those claims hold any water? 

Well, the answer, in short, is no. President Trump is not on some mission to defund police, but that hasn’t stopped Biden from claiming otherwise. 

In an interview with ABC 15, Biden claimed the following while speaking with news anchor Steve Irwin: 

“I am opposed to defunding police. As a matter of fact, I call for putting more money in, $300 million to provide for community policing. If you look at the president’s budget, this is a real wake up call, look at his budget, he calls for cutting local funding for police nationally, now, in his budget, by almost a half a billion dollars, I think it’s $447 million.”

Biden seems to be stuck on this notion that President Trump is going to defund police by half a billion dollars. He was also quoted as repeating that notion during a fundraising event: 

“All this talk about the president saying I want to defund police departments, his budget calls for cutting police, local — aid to local police agencies, by half a billion dollars. Typical, isn’t it?”

The only thing is – President Trump has never once called for a defunding of police. As for his budget that Biden alleges is somehow defunding police “by half a billion dollars,” the details from Trump’s budget tell a whole different story. 

According to the White House’s proposed 2021 budget, which was actually drafted before the pandemic and the unrest since late-May, the following budget cuts are what Biden may be trying to call defunding the police. 

The White House is cutting $46 million in Transportation and Safety Administration (TSA) grants that are used to reimburse state and local law enforcement who so decide to post up their local resources at airports. Trump’s administration notes that state and local government have taken over said compensation. 

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Then there is $59 million being cut from the TSA Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response (VIPR) Teams, namely because the administration explained that the program is unnecessarily duplicating work already being done by other law enforcement agencies.

In a sense, it’s pointless spending. 

As for the COPS Hiring Program that was started by the Clinton administration, Trump is pulling $136 million from that program which was originally designed to help state and local law enforcement agencies hire new officers.

However, the funds have not been getting used for new hires, but rather have been used to subsidizes entry-level salaries and benefits.

According to the White House, the COPS Hiring Program  is not “well targeted to achieve public safety outcomes,” and that it only winds up maybe funding one or two police officers per agency. That money is now going to be redirected toward federal law enforcement functions. 

That’s a whopping $241 million of not defunding the police, but cutting unneeded spending and reallocating monies from the COPS Hiring Program and investing it into a different law enforcement agency. 

Now, there is also another cut of $244 million to the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program. However, that doesn’t fund any police force, but helps to compensate state and local agencies who lock ups illegal immigrants for committing crimes.

Guess where that money is now going? 

It’s going right to the source of the problem – by increasing enforcement efforts at the border and thus helping to alleviate the influx of illegal immigrants. 

So, those aforementioned cuts might be pulling from from law enforcement related endeavors – and then reinvesting them right back into law enforcement endeavors. In a nutshell, Biden is peddling in mis-truths saying that Donald Trump is trying to “defund the police.”

In fact, President Trump is actually increasing funds for law enforcement. When looking at the 2021 budget portion not related to cuts, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is getting an increase of $544 million. 

Biden: Police being attacked with a knife should ‘shoot ‘em in the leg instead of in the heart.’

WILMINGTON, DE – On Monday, Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden spoke on law enforcement at Bethel AME Church, a historically black church in Wilmington.

He wasn’t there to encourage unity between law enforcement and the black community, however.

His comments were regarding use of force policies and training needing to change.

Biden said:

“Instead of standing there and teaching a cop when there’s an unarmed person coming at ‘em with a knife or something, shoot ‘em in the leg instead of in the heart.” 

It’s unknown if Biden understands that “unarmed” and “coming at ’em with a knife” are mutually exclusive.

It’s also unknown whether Biden knows that police are not trained to shoot in the heart. Police are trained to shoot center mass, which is due to the area being the largest and therefore easiest to aim at to stop a threat.

Biden said, “There are a lot of things that can change,” with regard to police training.

Biden also announced that if elected, he would implement a “police oversight board” in his first 100 days as president.

The former Vice President spoke on his time with the Obama administration, saying:

“We set up, in the Justice Department, the ability for the Civil Rights Division to go in and look at the practices and policies of police departments. That’s why we were able to stop stop-and-frisk.

“Re-establish that with more teeth in it. Because we also have to fundamentally change the way in which police are trained.”

The National Review’s Dan McLaughlin reported in an article titled Joe Biden Doesn’t Know How Guns Work:

“But anyone who has been trained in police work or the military could tell you: Firing a gun is always potentially deadly force. You shoot for center mass, to kill, or you don’t shoot at all. If you’re not prepared to kill someone, you should not even point a loaded gun at them, much less fire it. If you don’t have grounds to shoot to kill, you don’t have grounds to shoot.

“There are all kinds of things that can go wrong by trying to shoot to wound, because most people are not expert marksmen, and even expert marksmen do not have the greatest of aim in chaotic circumstances. You can miss, and the person you’re shooting at isn’t stopped. You can miss, and hit and kill an innocent bystander. You can hit someone in an artery, and they bleed to death. You can be thinking “shoot to wound,” but the second radio car responding to the scene rolls out thinking ‘firefight in progress’ and opens both barrels.

“One thing police training gets right, though, is that it draws a clear line around firing your gun only when you are prepared to kill. Blurring that line is only going to make things worse.”

 

Joe doesn’t have the best track records with firearm knowledge. Here’s a report Law Enforcement Today’s Mitch McKinley brought you in January of this year.

Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden launched into the New Year by urging voters to make 2020 the year for gun control.

Biden did this while re-tweeting an Associated Press story which showed an elevated number of mass killings in the U.S. in 2019.

He pointed to 210 killings in 2019 as the reason to have sweeping gun control that would only impact law-abiding gun owners, yet no mention of keeping the guns out of the hands of criminals that used them to shoot and kill 47 police officers. 

Incidentally, the list was not isolated to firearm-related killings, it included killings carried out with axes, knives, and other weapons too.

In an ironic twist, the AP story showed California (the state with more gun control than any other) also had the most “mass slayings” of any state in 2019.

But Biden re-tweeted the story anyway, and used it to call for gun control:

“2019 was a year of record violence — it will be a moral failure if we allow 2020 to be the same. We have to elect leaders with the courage to take on the @NRA and pass common-sense gun safety reform. We have to end this epidemic.”

According to the L.A. Times article he was referring:

A database compiled by the Associated Press, USA Today and Northeastern University in Boston shows that there were more mass killings in 2019 than any year dating back to at least the 1970s, punctuated by a chilling succession of deadly rampages during the summer.

In all, there were 41 mass killings, defined as when four or more people are killed excluding the perpetrator. Of those, 33 were mass shootings. More than 210 people were killed.

Most of the mass killings barely became national news, failing to resonate among the general public because they didn’t spill into public places like massacres in El Paso and Odessa, Texas; Dayton, Ohio; Virginia Beach, Va.; and Jersey City, N.J.

You want to know what else didn’t make news? The number of times cops were put in potentially deadly situations because of the new laws in several states that allows violent criminals to be released almost immediately after their arrest because they have removed the bail system for virtually every charge. 

But you won’t find Joe talking about that. Yet, he claims that he really has his finger on the pulse of gun control.

In September, following a mass shooting at a church in Sunderland Springs, TX, Biden said:

“It’s irrational, with all due respect to the governor of Texas, it’s irrational what they’re doing. I mean every day; you see a mass shooting.”

Great on the hyperbole there Joe. Irrational to me is talking about bouncing kids on your lap and talking about your leg hair to kids. But I digress. 

Biden of course had been talking about the new Texas state law, which was signed by Gov. Abbott and which allowed residents of Texas to carry firearms in churches. 

On Sunday, good guys with a gun took out a bad guy with a gun at the West Freeway Church of Christ in Tarrant County on Sunday. 

According to witnesses, several parishioners opened fire on the gunman, killing him. At least one of the good guys was a security guard. 

Gun rights advocates praised the actions of those who took out the shooter, citing it as an example of a “good guy with a gun” which stopped a violent attack. 

Two men were killed in the shooting in addition to the gunman. 

“We lost two great men today, but it could have been a lot worse,” said Britt Farmer, pastor of the West Freeway Church. “I’m thankful that our government has allowed us the opportunity to protect ourselves.” 

You’ve gotta love Texas. Had this happened in states such as New York, Connecticut or California, the outcome may have been much different. 

The church was live streaming the service when shots were fired. A video that was posted on Twitter shows the moment that shots were fired and the response of the armed security member. We will caution you it may be graphic for some readers. 

Biden and other left-wing Democrats have repeatedly railed against having guns in schools, churches, and hospitals and argue that their presence does not make mass shootings less likely. 

“The idea that we don’t have elimination of assault-type weapons, magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them—it’s absolutely mindless,” said Biden last September. 

Speaking of mindless, Joe, are you suggesting that we return to single shot muskets? Because other than that, all weapons hold multiple rounds, including revolvers. This is the problem with the anti-gun nuts. They don’t have a clue what they’re talking about, which they prove every time they open their mouths. 

“It’s no violation of the Second Amendment. It’s just a bow of special interests of the gun manufacturers and the NRA,” he continued…. ah yes, the left’s favorite boogeyman, the National Rifle Association. 

Robert Francis O’Rourke, known to his Mexican brethren as “Beto”, weighed in after the latest shooting. 

“So saddened to hear about another church shooting in Texas, this one in White Settlement near Fort Worth. Clearly what we are doing in Texas, what we are doing in this country, when it comes to guns is not working.” 

Uh, sorry Robert. But in this case, the ability of Texans to defend themselves from nuts with a gun worked extremely well. 

If the gunman had been the only one in the church with a gun on Sunday, Lord only knows what the body count would be. Thanks to Gov. Abbott, an armed person or persons in the church were able to shoot the gunman and save lives. 

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and veterans called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing their untold stories. Click to check it out.

Murdered officer's grave desecrated before headstone even placed

 

Abbott signed the bill last June, which allowed Texans to carry guns in places of worship. This is what triggered Uncle Joe. 

The gunman was identified as a 43-year-old man from River Oaks. We will not identify him because he doesn’t deserve the publicity. Killed were Anton Wallace, 64, of Fort Worth and Richard White, 67, of River Oaks. 

The suspect had arrests in several jurisdictions, and had been arrested in Tarrant County, as well as other states on charges including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. 

After Gov. Abbott signed the bill, the church’s leadership had made a decision to train its members to protect each other. 

“I think you can see from the video that that guy was surrounded rather quickly by more than just a few people,” according to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Paxton said that he hoped that more churches will prepare for shootings the way West Freeway Church of Christ did. 

Back in 2013, Uncle Joe was at a Facebook Town Hall sponsored by Parents Magazine. One questioner at the time named Kate asked how gun owners would be able to protect themselves if Congress passed a bill banning certain weapons and high capacity magazines.

“Kate, if you want to protect yourself get a double-barreled shotgun,” Biden said.

Biden related that he had told his wife that since they lived in a secluded area that’s wooded, he told her:

“Jill if there’s ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony here, walk out, put [up] that double barreled shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house.”

He really said that. 

“You don’t need an AR-15. Buy a shotgun! Buy a shotgun!”  

Now, for anyone who has ever fired a shotgun, it isn’t exactly the easiest weapon to use and to maintain target acquisition of, especially for most females. According to a gun shop owner in Texas, the AR-15, not a shotgun, is a better weapon of choice for home defense due to its accuracy.

“The AR-15 is now a mainstream weapon because of its quality design and accuracy,” said Jesse Bonner.

He added that smaller women could have more trouble firing a 12-gauge shotgun due to the recoil. 

Probably the most ludicrous thing Biden has ever said (granted, there is a LOT of competition) was during an interview with Field and Stream magazine.

He suggested that if someone was looking to protect themselves from an intruder they should “just fire the shotgun through the door.” He added that most people “can handle a shotgun a hell of a lot better than they can a semi-automatic weapon.” 

The fact that Biden is leading the field of Democrat candidates set to run against President Trump should give comfort to Trump supporters. The guy is a gaffe a minute and the more he speaks, the more clueless he appears. 

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
 
Facebook Follow First
Share:
Related Posts