The following includes editorial content which represents the views of the author, a staff writer for Law Enforcement Today. The opinions expressed are his own.
WASHINGTON, DC- The next time you hear Democrats talk about “violent mobs” creating an “insurrection” at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, just ignore them if you haven’t already.
They are clearly abject hypocrites, as if we weren’t already aware. Such was the case this week after violent extremists have threatened to show up at the homes of at least five conservative members of the Supreme Court.
Yes, the same group of American Marxists who shrugged their shoulders as violence swept across the U.S. unabated in 2020 are now taking the same stance as unhinged leftist lunatics are planning to take their group meltdown to the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices.
This is of course nothing new. In 2020, the head unhinged loon in the Senate, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), threatened two Supreme Court justices by name—Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, again over the sacred cow of Democrats, the murder of babies in the womb.
“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price."pic.twitter.com/XfDTtzDQ4o
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) March 4, 2020
This week, after liberals engaged in a group hissy fit after word was leaked out by an insurrectionist whistleblower believed to be a Supreme Court clerk that the high court was likely going to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Had any of these deranged lunatics on the left, be they in Congress, the media, or the purple hair crowd who have zero chance of anyone wishing to impregnate them in the first place, had any knowledge of how our system of government works, they would have realized that by and large no “birthing person” who wanted to murder their baby would be prevented from doing so.
States such as California and New York, who allow abortion up until the time the child is literally ready to leave the birth canal, will still allow women to murder their kids up until they are born.
The same goes for a bunch of blue states. The overturning of Roe will literally not impact probably 90% of women who use abortion as birth control. They are having a shit fit for no reason.
According to the Media Research Center, on Thursday Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy asked outgoing White House propaganda minister Jen Psaki about leftist activists doxing the six “conservative” Supreme Court justices (although why anyone considers John Roberts a conservative is beyond us) by publishing their home addresses so the collective group of whining crybabies could raise mayhem at their homes.
Doocy, who never shies away from asking Psaki uncomfortable questions, mentioned the fact that just last week, Joe Biden smeared Republicans as the “most extreme group in history” and therefore wanted to know if “the progressive activists that are now planning protests outside some of the justices’ houses are extreme?”
Here's the "Ruth Sent Us" group defending the map they published since doesn't include precise addresses of the Supreme Court Justices, only streets & towns. Apparently Ruth Sent Us is hoping it's precise enough that their supporters will just happen to march by the right homes. pic.twitter.com/daK83UYblY
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) May 6, 2022
Psaki, true to the line of leftists as American cities were burning said, without a care whatsoever that, “Peaceful protests are not extreme.”
Doocy reminded Psaki, who claims to be a mother, that “some of these justices have young kids” and “their neighbors are not all public figures.” Doocy asked Psaki if Biden would be “waving off” the leftist loons (our words, not his) that were planning to go to peaceful “residential neighborhoods in Virginia and Maryland.”
Psaki acted as someone who was clearly inconvenienced by the line of questioning and appeared to be someone who simply couldn’t care less about a bunch of nutjobs descending on residential neighborhoods to harass government officials.
“Peter, look, I think our view is that peaceful protests, there is a long history in the United States and the country of that,” she said in a clear condescending manner. “And we certainly encourage people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence.”
Doocy then told Psaki that “activists posted a map with the home addresses of the Supreme Court justices. Is that the kind of thing the presidents wants to help your side to make their point?”
Psaki replied, “Look, I think the President’s view is that there is a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across the country about what they saw in that leaked document. We obviously want people’s privacy to be respected. We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. That is certainly what the President’s view would be.”
“So he doesn’t care if they are protesting outside the Supreme Court or outside someone’s private residence?”
“I don’t have an official U.S. government position on where people protest. I want it—we want it, of course to be peaceful. And certainly the President would want people’s privacy to be respected, but I think we shouldn’t lose the point here.”
So, what the point is apparently is that protests from leftist goons over abortion is ok, while protests over what some feel was a criminally stolen election is not. One can make the argument that more people have been hurt in the so-called “peaceful” abortion issue protests than were hurt on Jan. 6.
Yet, despite people such as Schumer, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Kamala Harris, and others going completely off the rails in encouraging violence, the only government official to have been punished thus far for ostensibly “encouraging violence”—to “peacefully and patriotically go to the Capitol to make your voices heard”—is former President Donald J. Trump.
This is brilliant!! https://t.co/SMgdJYSa6Y
— Jenna Tracy (@JennaTracy7) May 5, 2022
Doocy wasn’t the only member of the White House press corps to raise the issue of violence. EWTN White House correspondent Owen Jensen stood up and in a rather aggressive tone reminded Psaki that “a Catholic church was just vandalized with pro-abortion slogans in Colorado.”
Psaki claimed not to have “seen that report,” however tepidly claimed “we don’t condone vandalism.” As Jensen pressed further, Psaki started babbling about polls that show support for Roe.
In a rare case of the press corps actually engaging in journalism (other than Doocy), CBS White House correspondent Ed O’Keefe also went after Psaki on the issue of potential violence.
“…there’s a stepped-up monitoring among law enforcement across the country for potential violence,” he noted, including stepped-up security for the justices. Claiming to be “curious” about Biden’s reaction, he asked, “What the message might be to those who are upset by this and are contemplating the unthinkable?”
Psaki claimed Biden was for “peaceful” protesting, adding, “We should not be resorting to violence in any way, shape, or form. That’s certainly what he would be conveying.
Not so ironically, CBS Evening News ignored the exchange despite their own correspondent being involved.
In what had to be one of the biggest shocks of the press briefing, NBC chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander engaged in hard questioning of Psaki as to whey the administration also did not condemn the leak which started the whole sordid mess in the first place?
Such a leak is unprecedented in the history of the high court and has been widely criticized by those on the political right, as well as some college law professors as a serious breach of protocol and history.
In her usual condescending snarky manner, Psaki asked Alexander if he’s “ever reported on anything that’s been leaked” to him.
“I have. And you guys have criticized leaks before as it’s been provided,” Alexander replied. “So you’ve criticized in the past, why not criticize this leak?”
“Again, because I think is happening here and what we think is happening here is an effort to distract from the actual issue here, which is the fundamental rights…” Psaki said, completely evading the issue.
“But can’t both be true?” Alexander asked.
To which Psaki replied in a tone deaf manner, “I don’t think they’re at the same level.”
“So they’re not at the same level, but would you agree it’s worthy of condemnation?” Alexander pressed one more time, whereby Psaki babbled that concerns about the leak were “distractions” and then ignored Alexander and moved on.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.