Politicians snuck amnesty for thousands of illegal immigrants into spending bill that President Trump signed


Earlier in the week, Law Enforcement Today reported on an insidious bill that had made its way through the House, in which Ted Cruz gave his opinions on what these multi-thousand paged styled bills seek to accomplish: hoping that no one ever reads them in their entirety.

Well, there’s more to that bill than meets the eye, including amnesty for thousands of illegal aliens, additional paid leave for government employees, and a proposed ban on asking about criminal histories on government job applications.

You’ve likely heard the amazing aspects attributed to this bill, such as pay increases for the military, as the bill is titled the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020.

Yet, this bill is inundated with portions that may have inadvertently been signed into law after President Trump placed his John Hancock on the dotted line.

What’s being labeled as a “national defense bill” has managed to sneak in more than questionable portions amid the thousands of pages. Of course, when you’re introducing novel-sized bills, it’s not hard to sneak something in there.

Included in this “defense bill” is the authorization of amnesty being attributed toward about 4,000 Liberian illegal aliens. On page 2,659 of the NDAA conference report, we have what is referred to as the “Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness.”

Now this sneaky piece of legislation would make it impossible for President Trump to end the Deferred Enforced Departure program that was enacted by Bush in 2007, which was used to shield Liberian illegal aliens who claim they can’t return to their home country.

The reason why that aspect is so important, is that Trump vowed to end the program since there’s no longer any sort of civil war or conflict within Liberia; yet now that he unknowingly signed the bill that contained that language, they’ll now have a permanent path to citizenship instead of a ticket home.

Another portion of the bill includes 22,500 visas through the Special Immigrant Visa program, which is a 4,000 visa increase from the 18,500 limit previously in place.

These visas would be issued to former Afghan interpreters who were present during the war and aided in helping translate communications between U.S. military personnel and locals. While their efforts were instrumental in many of our efforts overseas, there’s not much logic behind offering visas to these individuals outside of a gesture of appreciation.

Also included in the bill are the provisions of the Fair Chance Act, introduced by the late Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings.

You may have heard murmurs within various states over the years of private employers adopting a “ban the box” aspect of their application and interview process.

Essentially, that entails job applications no longer hosting a question inquiring of whether an applicant has a criminal history. While in the private sector, that can make some sense, but it seems odd that the federal government wants that going across the board.

The federal policy will bar agencies asking about an applicant’s criminal history or past arrests until a conditional job offer has been made. This would also extend to federal contractors as well if they so decide to remain on those lucrative contract vehicles.

On top of all that, you as a taxpayer will be shelling out for three months additional paid time off for every government employee who decides to start a family or adopt a child.

While paternity and maternity leave are admirable notions to consider, most individuals within the private sector are simply afforded time off from work to bond with their new addition; not get paid their salary while not doing their job.

It’s a slap in the face to those of us who are compelled to balance our finances when we decide to plan for a family, while our elected officials get to garnish our wages to fund their own time off.

This is how we find ourselves in the monetary messes and insurmountable debt ceiling of today. It’s time to put an end to bills nearly three times the amount of pages as “War and Peace”.

Earlier this week, we wrote about how Democrat candidates plan on taking the White House by promising free stuff to illegal immigrants.

“I hope they keep talking like this, because they are guaranteeing a Trump win in 2020. You cannot keep offering enticements. It entices more people to come to this country.

More people are going to put themselves in the hands of criminal organizations. More women are going to be raped. More children are going to die. And cartels are going to keep getting richer.

It’s ridiculous. I hope they keep talking, because most Americans don’t want this,” said Tom Homan on Fox and Friends.

What was he talking about?

Bernie Sanders, in a campaign stop, promised more free stuff to people who are not legally in this country.

“When I talk about Medicare for all, that includes undocumented people as well. When I say public colleges and universities, tuition free, that includes as I said earlier, undocumented young people.”

Bernie Sanders


According to the Bernie website, he has a wide-open border approach to immigration. He wants to provide:

  • Institute a moratorium on deportations until a thorough audit of past practices and policies is complete.
  • Reinstate and expand DACA and develop a humane policy for those seeking asylum.
  • Completely reshape and reform our immigration enforcement system, including breaking up ICE and CBP and redistributing their functions to their proper authorities.
  • Dismantle cruel and inhumane deportation programs and detention centers and reunite families who have been separated.
  • Live up to our ideals as a nation and welcome refugees and those seeking asylum, including those displaced by climate change.

It is interesting that he used the word “ideals.” An ideal is something that exists only in the imagination; but not likely to become a reality.

And Sanders wants to continue enticing more people to violate the laws of this country in coming here by offering them a free college experience, completely free healthcare, and oh, by the way, he thinks we might as well help them with the cost of a place to live by providing them Section 8 vouchers with no waiting lists.

While Bernie envisions these things as part of a Utopian society where everything is perfect, the reality is, far too often, Americans will be Clark W. Griswold, and illegal immigrants are Cousin Eddie living in Clark’s driveway in a broke down Winnebago, dumping raw sewage into your storm drain.

Oh, but wait, there’s more.

Pete Buttigieg has committed, if elected, to paying reparations for illegal immigrants.

Politicians snuck amnesty for thousands of illegal immigrants into spending bill that President Trump signed
Mayor Pete Buttigieg (Wikipedia)


According to Breitbart, Buttigieg was asked at the latest Democrat presidential primary debate if he would commit to giving “financial compensation” to illegal immigrants separated at the U.S.-Mexico border. When responding, the mayor not only asserted his administration would pay reparations, but also promised that illegal immigrant families separated at the border would have a “fast track to U.S. citizenship.”

Elizabeth Warren wants to provide legal counsel for immigrants facing deportation. Furthermore, she wants taxpayers to pay for it, saying she’ll call for creating a national-scale immigration public defender corps, and a Warren administration will provide access to counsel in immigration court.

Cory Booker wants to eliminate the public charge rule. He wants to make sure that people who are here illegally have unfettered access to government funded programs like WIC, food stamps, and all other assistance programs. 

Tom Steyer wants to increase aid packages to Central America that can help fund a path to citizenship for people wanting to leave those countries and come to the US.

Do you see a pattern developing here?

Untold millions for people to come here. Our tax dollars being spent on people of other nationalities…all while we have issues like veteran suicide and homelessness, police officers killing themselves, and not a single candidate is really talking about this and laying out a plan to fund meaningful changes to these to the enormous problems.



There are more than half a million people homeless in the country. Almost 10% of those numbers are comprised by veterans.

That statistic is made even more problematic when you realize that veterans only make up 5% of the population of the US.

This means that veterans are 2 times more likely to become chronically homeless than other groups in this country.

Here are some numbers to back up the contributing factors:

  • Over 968,000 veterans lived in poverty in the last year.
  • 20,000 veterans with government sponsored mortgages lost their homes in 2010.
  • 76% of homeless veterans experience alcohol, drug, or mental health issues.
  • 30.2% of veterans ages 18-24 are unemployed.

Here is some surprising information about homeless veterans:

  • 89% received an honorable discharge.
  • 67% served 3 years or more.
  • 47% are Vietnam veterans
  • 15% served before Vietnam
  • 5.5% are Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Meanwhile, suicide rate sin veteran community look like this. 30 veterans kill themselves for every 14 civilians per capita every year.

Annually, 1 of every 7 suicides are veterans, while they only account for 1 out of every 20 in the population. So, they are almost 3 times as likely to commit suicide than their civilian counterpart.

PTS, PTSD, Carl Higbie, The Whiskey Patriots


209 cops have taken their own lives this year. Sadly, we still have a few days left in 2019, so that number could rise. We pray that it doesn’t.

Cops make up 0.24 percent of our population. Yet, they make up .48 percent of the population…again making them twice as likely to take their own life than the civilians around them.


Why do these numbers matter?

Why do military and law enforcement kill themselves at a higher rate than their neighbors who never served?

Why do we not hear more about it?

Why are the candidates not saying much about it?

While they cannot stop talking about how to give more free stuff to people who are here illegally, we have men and women who have served our nation honorably, that are in desperate need of attention.


Bernie? Pete? Elizabeth? Cory? Tom?

But instead, we have candidates attacking cops.

Following suit after several other Democratic Presidential hopefuls, former Housing Secretary Julián Castro took aim again at Law Enforcement this week.

Castro penned in an op-ed he wrote for Shondaland, that his plan is to reform law enforcement as a whole.  

He claims that police violence and gun violence should be looked at as the same issue. The need for this op-ed resulted in the fact that Castro did not qualify to participate in a fifth democratic presidential debate that took place Wednesday night.

Castro felt that if candidates would be talking about any type of police reform on the stage during the debate, it was only because he brought the idea up first.

In an interview Castro gave on Tuesday evening to political commentator Angela Rye he stated:

“If they talk about police reform, it’s because we brought it up first. … If they talk about communities that need things as basic as clean water, it may be because I went to Flint first in this 2020 cycle,” he said.

While Castro might feel like he brought the topic of law enforcement into the spotlight on the democratic political debate stage by releasing his comprehensive “People First Policing” plan in June of 2019,  he’s certainly not the only one who expressed their onions on the topic.  More on that later.

In his op-ed Castro wrote:

“I’m the only candidate with a stand-alone plan to reform policing and why I don’t hesitate to say the names of victims,” Castro explained.

“Police violence is gun violence too, and we must speak out for Black and Brown people who often don’t have an effective first chance at life.”

He didn’t really give any details of what makes “police violence” a form of “gun violence” however.

He also went on to write

“I put forward an immigration platform that completely rejects Trump’s cruelty and set the standard for the entire field of candidates. I visited Matamoros, México, where asylum seekers are living in squalor due to this administration’s failure to fix our broken immigration system.”

It appears perhaps that Castro might have just needed to add several ‘trigger words’ into one op-ed to show how ‘woke’ he really is? 

A desperate attempt maybe to be include in further debates? Although, even if he is not doing well in the polls, he has no intention of stopping it seems.

“In the community I’m from, quitting is not an option,” he wrote in his op-ed the day after his interview. Many would argue though he probably should just quit while he isn’t really ahead. 

Sources released that Castro’s campaign recently laid off staff in South Carolina as well as New Hampshire. This would indicate that while publicly he may be saying he’s holding on for the long haul, he’s seen the writing on the wall.  Probably not though, as he closed his piece with this statement:

“I’m running for president so that no matter who you are, you can reach your American Dream. And I will not stop fighting for that future.”

Here are some direct excerpts from Castro’s “People First Policing” Plan from his campaign website;

  • On the day Julián announced his candidacy for President of the United States, he talked about health care and education, economic prosperity and immigration. And he also talked about the frightening rate at which unarmed black and brown folks have been killed by law enforcement officers all over America.
  • “If police in Charleston, South Carolina can arrest Dylann Roof after he murdered nine people worshipping at Bible study, without hurting him,” he said in January, “then don’t tell me that Michael Brown, and Tamir Rice, and Aiyana Jones, and Eric Garner, and Jason Pero, and Stephon Clark, and Sandra Bland shouldn’t still be alive today, too.”
  • In the United States, according to a Washington Post analysis, nearly one thousand people are shot and killed by police each year. When you break down that number, you see clearly that black men make up a disproportionate number of the victims of excessive police force. This is not a case of a few bad apples. The system is broken.
  • We have on our hands a national crisis in public safety. If elected president, Julián Castro would treat this as the crisis it is, demanding of a federal response. This is Julián’s plan to fix this broken system:
  1. End over-aggressive policing and combat racially discriminatory policing.
  2. Hold police accountable.
  3. Start the healing process between communities and law enforcement.

In case you missed it earlier last month LET brought you a more comprehensive break down of where certain democratic candidates stood in regards to law enforcement.  Here you go:

This weekend, President Trump was presented with the Bipartisan Justice Award at the Second Step Presidential Justice Forum.

It was an event filled with Democrat contenders for President doing their best to one-up each other on bashing the police.

Did you know that Law Enforcement Today has a private new home for those who support emergency responders and veterans?  It’s called LET Unity, and it’s where we share the untold stories of those patriotic Americans.  Every penny gets reinvested into giving these heroes a voice.  Check it out today.

Politicians snuck amnesty for thousands of illegal immigrants into spending bill that President Trump signed


It all started when Senator Kamala Harris didn’t show up.  Acting like a petulant child, she canceled in protest because the group was giving the award to President Trump, and it was an award she received in 2016.

Then, two Democratic presidential candidates attacked police officers nationwide as being racist on Saturday at the forum.

Video surfaced shortly after the event that should have every police officer thinking twice about which candidate they’ll be supporting in the 2020 election.

At the event, a black student asked Sanders how he should handle getting pulled over by a cop.

Sanders response?

“Respect what they are doing so that you don’t get shot in the back of the head.” 

The question-and-answer session took place at the forum at Benedict College, which is a historically black college.

The student posed to Sanders:

“If I’m your son, what advice would you give me next time I’m pulled over by a police officer?”

Sanders said to identify the police officer “in a polite way.”

“I would respect what they are doing so that you don’t get shot in the back of the head, but I would also be very mindful of the fact that as a nation, we have got to hold police officers accountable for the actions that they commit,” he said.

And make sure it’s being recorded, he said.

“I would be very cautious if you were my son in terms of dealing with that police officer, but I would also defend my rights and know my rights and make sure if possible that police officer’s camera is on what goes on.”

According to CBS News campaign reporter LaCrai Mitchell, the question seemed to “stump” Sanders and he struggled to answer it, ultimately not getting much applause or crowd approval when he did, she said.

Later in the forum, former Vice President Joe Biden was asked a similar question by a black female student. 

“If you were my daughter, you’d be a Caucasian girl and you wouldn’t be pulled over,” Biden said. “That’s what’s wrong.” 

Politicians snuck amnesty for thousands of illegal immigrants into spending bill that President Trump signed


Biden double down by tweeting out a clip of his answer, letting America know that cops are racist and he’ll put an end to it.

“Institutional racism should no longer exist. As president, I’ll put forward change to help put an end to it,” he said in the clip.

Sanders came under attack for his response.

One of those people coming after him was Morehouse College adjunct professor David Dennis Jr., who said:

“Bernie Sanders does not understand race in America.” 

Unlike Biden, Sanders didn’t post his response on Twitter… instead sharing a clip of him commenting on the criminal justice system.

“If you are wealthy and powerful, or maybe the president, you are above the law. But if you are poor, if you’re black, if you’re Hispanic, it’s a different story,” he said in the clip.

The justice forum was held by the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center.

President Trump entering the White House marked a new day for law enforcement.  It was a notable turn from the anti-police agenda advanced by his predecessor and was a sigh of relief for all those of us on the street.

Unfortunately, the damage done by Obama was lasting, with liberal judges continuing to fight President Trump every step of the way on all things law and order.  And with liberal Governors now deciding that their “feelings” matter more than enforcing the law… we’re seeing an existential threat to democracy here in America.

You need not look any further than the Democrat candidates running for president to see that their party is one in which law and order place second fiddle to scoring votes.

Most of them have something in common – desperate pleading for open borders, a call to decriminalize sneaking into the country, an insistence that police are all racist, a demand to eliminate ICE, pushes to shred the criminal justice system and an insistence that it’s ok to break the law if you don’t agree with the law.  Oh, and desperate screaming that President Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, insert “ism” or “phobic” here.

To my brothers and sisters who hold the Thin Blue Line – part of our job is to recognize threats and enemies.  And sometimes those threats are right in our backyard.


Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Related Posts