NEW YORK – As cities and states around the nation look at ways to make strict reforms on their police, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is about to deliver on his promise to enact a “Say Their Name” police reform agenda.
Along party lines in both houses, the state’s legislature has passed a bill that would repeal a current bill, New York Civil Rights Law section 50a.
In recent years, law makers have attempted to make changes to section 50a, which has been a law for over 40 years in the State of New York, to no avail.
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
-transparency in police departments
— Ed Drantch (@EdDrantch) June 10, 2020
Repealing the section will now make public all complaints against officers in addition to transcripts and final dispositions of disciplinary proceedings.
Cuomo, of course, has said that he “would sign any bill the legislature passed on 50-A reform, and the bill is written to take effect ‘immediately,'” according to the Gothamist.
NY should lead the way and pass the “Say Their Name” Reform Agenda:
1. Make police disciplinary records transparent
2. Ban chokeholds
3. Make false race-based 911 reports a hate crime
4. Attorney General must act as independent prosecutor for any police murder case pic.twitter.com/WDypKqeo3Q
— Andrew Cuomo (@NYGovCuomo) June 5, 2020
The Gothamist also reported:
“The law does not require agencies to turn over information on ‘technical infractions,’ which are defined as ‘solely related to the enforcement of administrative departmental rules that
(a) do not involve interactions with members of the public,
(b) are not of public concern, and
(c) are not otherwise connected to such person’s investigative, enforcement, training, supervision, or reporting responsibilities.'”
— Melissa DeRosa (@melissadderosa) June 6, 2020
One of the sponsors for the bill, Assemblyman Dan O’Donnell, said that the bill that was passed is largely the full repeal that protesters and advocates have been shouting about.
“It is left somewhat vague on purpose in order to allow it to be interpreted and to allow an individual to challenge that interpretation.”
Another co-sponsor, Senator Jamaal Bailey, said:
“The silver lining on this incredibly dark cloud is that the sun is finally starting to shine on injustice.
Maybe it’s the unmistakable, and in my opinion indisputable, video evidence that we saw a live murder on TV, but it’s done something to the consciousness of America.
I don’t know if there could be a more meaningful piece of legislation for me and this body because it’s way more than just policy.
“There’s a time to not only correct what we thought and knew to be a flaw in the state law, but to correct misconceptions that many of us have carried for too long for things that we can never experience.”
Brooklyn State Assemblyman Erik Dilan said he supported the bill, but didn’t think it was strict enough. He said the phrase “are not of public concern” shouldn’t be in there.
“NYPD’s lawyers have a tremendous amount of things they do not believe are of ‘public concern.'”
During the two-and-a-half-hour discussion on the bill, Senator Patrick Gallivan, who voted against the bill, said:
“There’s no honest, decent police chief, there’s no honest, decent police officer, who does not want to make sure the bad cops are held accountable. The question of course is how best do we do that? We don’t do it by taking the civil rights away.”
Police unions across the state issued a joint statement opposing the repeal, saying the repeal is an “attack on law enforcement.”
Groups representing 200,000+ law enforcement officers in NY State joined together to condemn actions of the NYS Legislature & Governor in using the current crisis to hastily push through legislation to diminish public safety & make the job of all LEO’s more difficult & dangerous. pic.twitter.com/vZyMoTZj71
— NYCPBA Legal (@NYCPBA_GC) June 9, 2020
Police Benevolent Association President Pat Lynch said during a Tuesday press conference:
“We, as professionals, are under assault. And this in a backdrop of a night when we had seven shootings (in Brooklyn) in seven minutes.”
Assemblyman Phil Ramos, who was a police officer for 20 years, said that he believes the legislation would help law enforcement officers. He said:
“If you have the power to take a human life, there should be more sunlight shining.
“I say to my brother and sister police officers, your enemy is not the communities of color who are crying out for justice. Your enemies are these bad officers, who take it too far. I know it feels like the whole world is coming down on you, but the problem is coming from the people at your side.”
Readers have been writing in to Law Enforcement Today expressing their concern on the possibility of this repeal passing. It’s not the transparency or accountability they’re worried about: It’s their families’ safety.
Violent protesters have taken to calling on people to find officers’ home addresses and show up there to protest and/or be violent at their homes. With the way the climate is right now, releasing information on officers who may have gotten complaints is a dangerous notion, they say.
One reader wrote in, saying:
“The problem is that they may release personal information along with those records. If that happens, police officer home addresses could be released to the public.
“Police opponents recently advocated for googling for personal information to attack homes of officers if only names are released. Repealing 50a would be beyond reckless in this climate.”
Law Enforcement Today has done some research on the repeal, and we are hopeful that the language of the bill, while of course revealing disciplined officers’ names, will at least prevent the personal information, such as home addresses, from being disclosed.
This, according to co-sponsor O’Donnell, is “an extra layer of protection.”
Of course we recognize that it doesn’t stop the protesters from googling home addresses, as mentioned above, but we are hopeful that the gesture of allowing the disciplinary information to be obtained through the state’s Freedom Of Information Law (FOIL) will in itself be enough to take away people’s desire to search for personal information.
As always, we encourage every officer and their families to exercise extreme caution, on and off duty.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.
Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!