Editor note: In 2020, we saw a nationwide push to “defund the police”. While we all stood here shaking our heads wondering if these people were serious… they cut billions of dollars in funding for police officers. And as a result, crime has skyrocketed – all while the same politicians who said “you don’t need guns, the government will protect you” continued their attacks on both our police officers and our Second Amendment rights.
And that’s exactly why we’re launching this national crowdfunding campaign as part of our
NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI- Last week, we wrote about historian and Hoover Institute at Stanford University fellow Victor Davis Hansen comparing what is occurring in modern-day America to the fall of Rome.
One subject addressed was the moral decay of Rome and the U.S. being similar in scope. An article posted this week in The Federalist addresses we may be there sooner rather than later.
In Rhode Island, a mother has filed a police report against the North Kingstown High School in North Kingstown for promoting a book that aggrandizes gay pornography to minors by placing it in the school’s library.
The book, entitled “Gender Queer: A Memoir” is published by Lion Forge Comics and was written and illustrated by someone named Maia Kobabe who uses bogus pronouns of e/em/eir (whatever the hell that means) and who states the work focuses on so-called “anti-fascism,” the description on Amazon reads.
According to the parent, Nicole Solas, posted a photograph on Twitter of the book which was prominently featured in a display case at the high school and highlighted pornographic images contained therein.
North Kingstown High School in Rhode Island showcased gay pedophilia porn. pic.twitter.com/B1wgnFyo9d
— Nicole Solas Domest Terrorist MILFederally Charge (@Nicoletta0602) October 2, 2021
Solas, mother of a kindergarten student, also wrote that she is submitting “evidence of distribution of pornography at North Kingstown High School” and noted that the book was being made “available to minor children.” She posted a photographic image of the typed report which she submitted to police.
This is the applicable RIGL. pic.twitter.com/Q6KiJWfiPZ
— Nicole Solas Domest Terrorist MILFederally Charge (@Nicoletta0602) October 11, 2021
The book is currently ranked at number 11 in Amazon’s “LGBTQ+ Graphic Novels” section (who knew there was such a thing?) and highlights discussion of gay sexual fantasies and is described as extremely graphic, including scenes of gay men having sex and a scene of one man performing oral sex on another.
Indoctrination of kids? No, of course not.
In other sheer extremism the book examines “bonding with friends over erotic gay fanfiction,” and is intended for those aged “16 years and up,” according to Amazon.
One reviewer noted that the book gets extremely graphic and one might say disgusting in one particular scene where a young person (described to look like a boy, however, has female sexual organs) is encouraged by her sister to “taste” herself.” Extremism? You decide.
In 2020, the book was awarded the so-called “Alex Award” by the Young Adult Library Services Association, a subdivision of the American Library Association. The award is advertised as being directed to books that “have special appeal” to those aged “12 through 18.”
The book is touted as a “great resource” in a review on Amazon by the School Library Journal, which touts itself as “the premiere publication for librarians and information specialists who work with children and teens,” and “the largest reviewer of kid & [young adult] content.”
The book is also clearly intended to appeal to a younger audience, obvious based upon the graphic art style of the book. A number of one-star reviews on Amazon noted that although the book is marketed to children, it includes pornography.
In one review, the reviewer wrote that the book “can be found in public libraries in the teen section which is disgusting,” while another review had the writer asking, “Why is it in the teen section of public libraries?”
In yet another case, the reviewer lit up the book, writing, “Minors depicted in sex acts. This book is for grooming young people to be victims of [pedophilia].”
Despite the book being marketed to children and teens and being located in library areas designated for young children and teens, Patreon warns visitors to Kobabe’s page that the content is intended for those 18 and up.
This is of course but another case of the attempted indoctrination of children and teens in radical LGBT and the rest of the alphabet ideology.
When gay marriage was deemed legal by the Supreme Court several years ago, many people warned this was only the first step and that the radical gay rights lobby would be chipping away at other things, which we have seen with the recent obsession with the “T” part of the above acronym.
Now, as many warned it appears that pedophilia is the next domino to fall, as many have suggested that it should be treated as an illness rather than as the crime that it is and an attempt appears to be underway to “normalize” pedophilia.
The Federalist reached out to the School Library Journal, the principal and assistant principals at North Kingstown High School, and the superintendent of the North Kingstown School Department, however none responded to requests for comment.
Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
In an “oldie but goodie,” below is a story published in 2020 about Washington State wanting to indoctrinate children in LGBT ideology. For more on that:
The indoctrination of our children continues.
In Washington State, Democrats (who else) are pushing a bill that would mandate “comprehensive sexual health education” by the year 2022.
The bill, House Bill 2184 would begin to talk sex to children as young as kindergarten. While most children at that age are usually more interested in playing with dolls or trucks, Democrats would begin the process of pointing children in a different direction.
A group called “Informed Parents of Washington” is warning parents about the dangers of the legislation. The group describes itself as a “collation of parents dedicated to fighting Comprehensive Sexxx Education in our schools and legislation that imposes upon parental rights.”
In a Facebook post, the group said:
“In most cases ‘comprehensive’ doesn’t mean what we think it means. Most of us might think that means the biology of sex and the fertilization process, maybe to include some information about avoiding std’s and pregnancy.
In reality, though, most who promote “comprehensive sex education” are talking about the details of sexual activity and the varieties of sexual stimulation.
Many such programs include subtle (and not so subtle) encouragement for the students to experiment with some or opposite sex partners, instruction on the nature of orgasm and all the ways to achieve it, along with drawings and/or photos shat show them how.”
Democrats say that the bill would establish “equity,” i.e., equal access to health information, especially with regard to the topics of “affirmative consent’ and the needs of LGBTQ students.
Because students in elementary school need to know about that, right?
The Washington Office of superintendent of Public Instruction (OPSI) conducted a survey about sex education in schools, which netted more than 10,000 responses, nearly three-fourths from women.
The state formed a work group that was comprised of 16 women that reviewed K-12 sex education provisions in the state and their final report concluded that “members agree all students would benefit from K-12 comprehensive sexual health education.”
Ironically the survey found that 58 percent of survey respondents said that such a program should NOT be required in grades K-12, while 42 percent said it should be required. So obviously, the survey meant nothing, since these 16 apparently women had their minds apparently made up.
The group stated:
The Sexual Health Education Workgroup agreed that all students in Washington’s public schools should have access to comprehensive sexual health education (CSHE) in grades K-12.
Mandating CSHE is an issue of equity and would help ensure all students across the state receive quality, evidence-informed instruction, regardless of who they are or where they live.
The Workgroup found that several groups are often excluded from relevant, inclusive instruction, including students in and out of home care, students with disabilities, students who identify as LGBTQ+, and English learners among others.
The website of Washington Rep. Michelle Caldier (R) provides a radio report with John Sattgast in Olympia about the bill.
“When I looked at the curriculum, I’d be happy to read some of this stuff, but I will tell you I know that the chair would gavel me because it is completely inappropriate for me to say here,” Caldier said about the proposed mandated sex ed curriculum.
“And I think that if it is inappropriate for me to say on the dais, I don’t think that’s something that I would want to teach a kindergartner.”
Sattgast observed that out of 97 people signed up to testify, only 16 were permitted to do so within the time limit.
Though the bill to mandate comprehensive sex ed died in the last legislative session, the current bill is equally as controversial, stated Washington conservative radio host Jason Rantz of The Jason Rantz Show on AM 770 KTTH.
“And it’s fueled less about meeting the sexual needs of young kids (these needs don’t exist), than it is about pushing a very specific social justice agenda on gender identity for all classrooms,” he stated.
On their Facebook page, Informed Parents of Washington speak to what is actually contained in the curriculum. The group says that exercises given to sixth grade students makes sure that a child having sex is not shamed, while there is no similar concern for those who choose not to have sex. Students are not told about the benefits of abstinence.
The Democrats proposal, called “Rights, Respect, Responsibility: A K=12 Curriculum” apparently replaces the “3 R’s” of our youth (reading, wRiting and aRithmetic) with a new three “R’s”—Rights, Respect and Responsibility.
Under the program, kindergarteners would learn about the proper names for body parts, but only after a “note on language” clarifies that BIOLOGY is SUBSERVIENT to gender identity.
While children in kindergarten will have language that uses the terms ‘girls’ and ‘boys,’ along with ‘male’ and ‘female’, in later grades they will be instructed in proper pronouns according to the alphabet mafia, introducing a “broader concept of gender.”
With the assistance of a PowerPoint presentation, teachers will instruct young children:
Most girls have a vulva which is the name for the area between the legs.
The vulva describes the whole area including the small hole where urine or pee comes out called the opening to the urethra, the hole below that, which is a little bigger and is called the vagina that is used when a female has a baby, and the hole below that where a bowel movement, or poop, comes out called the anus.
So, a person with a vulva has three holes between their legs and a very sensitive little area at the top called the clitoris.
Most boys have a penis between their legs which they use to urinate or ‘pee.’ Some boys have a foreskin, which is a piece of skin that covers the end of the penis and some boys do not. A boy also has a hole where a bowel movement, or poop, leaves the body called an anus, just like a girl.
Kindergarten people. Not wasting any time, when children go to first grade, they get to learn about gender roles. Teachers are instructed to read My Princess Boy prior to the lesson and then ask the children:
“Does the job a person has, or what they wear mean the person is a man or woman?” (No) “Do the activities someone likes to do for fun or what they wear mean they are a boy or a girl?” (No)
Close the lesson by asking “How could you support others in trying new things and participating in activities that some people may sometimes say are only for boys or only for girls?” Ask for volunteers to offer strategies.
(Some responses might include: tell them that you think it’s great; tell them that they shouldn’t listen to what other people think; tell them that you will do it with them; tell them that there is no such thing as girl activities and boy activities, etc.)
Indoctrination. Note the part about not “listen(ing) to what other people think?” Parents? No say?
Fast forward to sixth grade. This is where the gender neutral or gender non-binary nonsense gets touted.
In the proposal, sixth graders would learn “language…that seems less familiar—using the pronoun ‘they’ instead of ‘her’ or ‘him,’ using gender neutral names in scenarios and role-plays and referring to ‘someone with a vulva’ vs. a girl or woman.”
“This is intended to make the curriculum inclusive of all genders and gender identities,” states the proposal.
Once kids reach 15, they are going to be taught that “sexting” is normal sexual behavior. In fact, the teacher’s guide notes that the teacher will have to “ask your IT person at school to unblock the site for you to use in class.”
The homework assignment tells the kids to go out and share their knowledge with at least four friends. Kids are told that “this isn’t easy to talk about and you may still have questions. Remember you can always talk with me…” Meaning the teacher.
This is the Democrat party for you. Anything goes. Parents be damned. The state knows what is better for your children than you do. And we wonder why we are raising a generation of snowflakes?
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.
Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!