Miramar SWAT Team Members Suspended for Responding to Parkland Massacre


MIRAMAR, Fla. – When a gunman started shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, two Miramar SWAT team members did what comes naturally: They went to help.

And now they’ve been suspended for it.

The officers did not receive clearance to respond to the shooting in Parkland on Feb. 14, when 17 people were killed.

As a result, that created an officer safety issue and left them unaccountable for their actions, according to their police department.

Florida School MassacreBut Broward County PBA reacted differently, reported SunSentinel.

“While it may have been a violation of policy to not notify their supervisors that they were going there, their intentions were brave and heroic, I think,” Broward County PBA President Jeff Marano said Wednesday.

The SWAT officers who responded and now find themselves in trouble were Detective Jeffrey Gilbert and Detective Carl Schlosser. One of them told supervisors he was in the Coral Springs area when the gunfire happened; it’s not known where the other drove from, police spokeswoman Tania Rues said.

“They were both close by [the high school],” Rues said.

Moreover, a third SWAT member, Officer Kevin Gonzalez, was accused of being linked to several social media posts that put the city and police in a negative light. Consequently, he was suspended for violating the department’s social media policy and the code of conduct, according to Rues.

She said she “could not comment further on where he may have posted information about the mass shooting or what was written.”

Therefore, all three were notified Fed. 22 of their indefinite removal from the SWAT team, something the agency called a “privileged program.” To complete the process they were ordered to surrender their SWAT-issued rifles. Nevertheless, they remain on active duty for their primary assignments, Rues said.

The afternoon of the shooting, Miramar police placed the SWAT team on stand-by in case a request came from the Broward Sheriff’s Office to assist. According to Rues, the call for the team never came.

The Broward Sheriff’s Office said Wednesday it could not confirm whether anyone spoke with Miramar that day, but said Miramar’s SWAT team was “not needed” during the incident.

Although the SWAT team was not summoned, Miramar Police sent a victim’s advocate to help console victims’ families and officers to help direct traffic, Rues said.

mental healthThe instinct to run toward danger is a common one in police officers, seen often during terrorist attacks and mass shootings—by officers on and off duty.

But during the Jan. 6, 2017, shootings at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, over 2,000 cops responded to the original report of gunfire and false reports of additional shots fired, according to a report by the Broward Sheriff’s Office. Five people were killed and six others wounded in the rampage.

“Police officers have an inherent bias for action, and the minute they hear there’s a violent incident underway their immediate inclination is to go to it and try to stop the violence that is occurring,” Jim Bueermann, president of the Police Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based police research organization, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel last June. “And we want that in police officers. The problem is being able to channel that.”

But police response plans around the country have changed to avoid having cops swarm to scenes, thus creating logjams. A crowd of arriving law enforcement can negatively impact roads that ambulances need to use, overwhelm radios and in general, add to the confusion of the police response. At times, the lack of coordination adds to the chaos.

Lessons learned from the Aurora, Colo. movie theater shooting and the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport shooting “clearly demonstrate that a controlled, organized response is what is most effective,” Rues said.

Want More Stories Like This?

Subscribe to our email list and get notified each time we release a breaking news story.

Thank you for subscribing. Please check your inbox to confirm your email subscription.


News of interest to the law enforcement community.

I can’t understand “why” They suspend them. For a police officer, Duty is First, No matter what….. Even If he is in different JURISDICTIONs, AT LEAST he can STANd at location, guide community what to do, and dial 911 fro local police and also in case of emergency can take further steps. Law enforcement officer put their life in danger to protect community. These 2 detectives deserved Certificate of APPRECIATION nOT certificate of SUSPENSION.

There’s an old saying amongst cops, “Doing things right isn’t always doing the right thing”. There’s another old SAYING AMONGST cops, “always do the right thing “. There’s a whole LOtta folks with stars and bars that need to understand the difference between the two and how their actions affect the officers under their command and how that ultimately has a negative impact on the service they provide.

What is unclear in the report is if the swat members were on or off duty; if on, why didn’t they radio their intentions? If off duty, shouldn’t they have reported themselves available and requested instructions? Further, I was always trained to engage the shooter immediately to distract him/her from their intended targets. Why would an off-scene commander direct a perimeter for first arrivals, rather than having follow on officers do that? Lots of questions for the after-action review, I think. I hope there is a comprehensive release of findings. Much might be learned by many.

Leave a comment


Be Informed

Get notified when "One Step Ahead" presented by Jay Wiley is Live- the Official Law Enforcement Today Radio Show

Thank you for subscribing. Please check your inbox to confirm your email address.