Roxboro, North Carolina – A bizarre video posted to YouTube on August 11th of 2020 featured a man who goes by the moniker “Profit El” in which he makes a series of threats against law enforcement, elected officials and numerous others groups whom he designated as committing “treason” and “blasphemy of the Holy Spirit”.
The fifteen-minute video was rife with expletives and calls to commit murder against police and sheriff’s deputies in Roxboro, North Carolina along with taking down the likes of bank owners, politicians, and lawyers.
The theme of the video was pretty consistent throughout the entirety of the confessional-style rant. This Profit El character feels as though by some strangely articulated vesting of “power” by the “federal government”, he ushered in a call to arms to murder to any he deemed to be corrupt:
“Every goddam C.O., every cop, every fucking sheriff – you gonna fucking die. We’re gonna murder your fuck-ass and ain’t shit you gonna do about. There ain’t a goddam thing you can possibly fucking do about it.”
It wasn’t just the likes of law enforcement or politicians that came under the threats that Profit El stated, but also “foreigners” whom he said will be killed and have their businesses burned down. Sporadically throughout the rant, the individual kept invoking God as some strange validation to make such threats:
“The wrath of God is on you and I’m going to beat you with this dog-wood switch before I let some of my homies blow your fucking head off.”
Well, it didn’t take long for police in Roxboro to catch up with Profit El. The Roxboro Police Department posted on their Facebook page about arresting an individual after they posted a threatening video on YouTube.
While the RPD didn’t name the person arrested, which was for a parole violation per the department, the connection was easily made between the comments from YouTube video and the comments showcased on the RPD posting of the arrest. Furthermore, it appears as though that Profit El’s real name is Joseph Casey McGhee.
Now while McGhee does have a criminal background and clearly showcased a strange series of threats online that seems rather telling of his mental state more than anything – why exactly has YouTube allowed this video to remain on the website?
YouTube clearly has the ability to delete videos – since they’ve deleted several this year alone when it relates to anything contrary of what certain officials say regarding the pandemic.
Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
Remember back in April when YouTube removed that video of the two California doctors saying that the pandemic national reaction might be a little too much?
The two doctors were said to be promoting a “conspiracy theory” because they extrapolated current testing data and offered a hypothesis on mortality and infection rates of the pandemic. But since the arbiters of truth in big tech thought it to be “dangerous”, they deleted the video.
Dubious COVID-19 claims made by 2 Bakersfield-area doctors condemned by health experts; YouTube removes video https://t.co/1oHlKlEdMO
— KTLA (@KTLA) April 30, 2020
The same thing happened with the documentary called “Plandemic”. After featuring what was coined as “a well-known anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist”, that video was removed from YouTube after garnering millions of views online.
In late July, we saw the video of “America’s Frontline Doctors” also get removed from YouTube and social media outlets. When tech giants were asked about why the video was taken down, it was because they asserted that the video contained misinformation.
— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) July 28, 2020
Yet, a video where someone is making undeniable death threats to police, elected officials, bankers, lawyers, foreigners, correctional officers and numerous others can remain online.
How exactly does that happen?
It’s almost as though someone can upload videos making threats against police and since anti-law enforcement sentiments are trendy – then it can remain untouched. But heaven forbid someone seeing a video of one doctor issuing a differing opinion than another doctor.
Because that’s really dangerous to leave online.
LinkedIn permanently shuts down police spokesman for reporting story about man who tried to kill cops
“Gratuitously shocking content”.
That is apparently why the National Spokesman of Law Enforcement Today was permanently banned from Linkedin.
At least that is what the final email from LinkedIn to Kyle Reyes stated. After a myriad emails telling him his content was false and misleading (despite the fact that the stories were widespread in the mainstream media), Linkedin came up with the “gratuitously shocking content” moniker to silence Reyes once and for all on their platform.
Reyes’ voice has been repeatedly censored from the platform. Items removed include an article regarding Bill Gates acquisition of a 43 million dollar beach front home, while preaching climate change concerns to others.
LinkedIn determined that this contained “untrue facts” (what are untrue facts?). Although the acquisition is public information and there are many articles about it, including this one.
Another bit of content deemed to contain “untrue facts” was a March 2020 piece entitled “While Americans are distracted, Democrats have launched a full blown assault on gun rights.”
Virginia’s Governor has been trying to pass a bill to ban “assault” weapons since he took office. In New Hampshire, the Democrat controlled house and senate have been working on Red Flag bills since they took office in January of 2020 (the New Hampshire Bill passed the senate earlier this week and will head to the Governor’s desk for veto).
It’s tough to discern what “untrue facts” were presented in his article as opposed to say, this Concord Monitor Article.
Reyes would continually supply LinkedIn with supporting material proving that the content he was sharing was factual… and that it was simply being flagged by haters trying to silence his voice.
Over the past year, they’ve repeatedly restricted his account after he posted information to law enforcement about active threats against them.
They’ve seemingly ignored the countless death threats and hate speech messaged TO Reyes through LinkedIn, and instead appear to have targeted him because of his pro-law enforcement voice and massive following on LinkedIn’s platform.
Finally, in June of 2020, LinkedIn came up with the “Gratuitously shocking content” moniker and shut him down for good.
Others have shared the exactly same stories on LinkedIn – at the exact same time as Reyes – but have not been targeted. Could this possibly be an attempt by a large tech company to silence an ardent supporter of the Law Enforcement Community? It sure seems that way.
The content which Linkedin deemed gratuitously shocking is this article about officers being attacked from Law Enforcement Today.
It seems that any video content that shows police officers in acts of alleged malfeasance is allowed, shocking or not. But let’s move away from the topic du jour and see what kind of content Linkedin does not consider “Gratuitously shocking” in other realms of their platform.
There are some pretty nasty pictures in this article about a Spanish Slaughterhouse. It was posted a week ago by Totally Vegan Buzz. Warning: Gratuitously Shocking content: https://www.totallyveganbuzz.com/news/undercover-footage-reveals-horses-brutally-stabbed-and-cows-beaten-with-metal-sticks-at-spanish-slaughterhouse/
There’s a user with the name “Kill Whitey” who is the HooHaa manager at Del_Jen, Inc. according to his profile. That’s pretty offensive and yet he is allowed to be on the linked in platform. It’s also a call to violence, but against only people of non-color, so I guess that’s ok under Linkedin’s rules.
This next piece is gratuitously shocking as well. And while what this man went through is totally unacceptable and it is shocking one must wonder why it’s okay to post this content, but not content of law abiding police officers doing their jobs just like this law abiding FEDEX driver was trying to do. This was posted by many people, including Serene Bridgett Hollingsworth. She is still active on Linkedin.
cnTech Post posted this gratuitously shocking video of a Tesla crashing and catching fire. They are still up and running after that post two days ago.
These tech companies with mega platforms have been trying to silence conservative voices with confusing and subjective “terms and conditions” since the platforms started being used to confer political commentary.
Twitter has banned and shadow banned users for as far back as I can remember for stating conservative opinion. Facebook jail has become a joke it’s so LIBERALLY populated with conservatives.
What LinkedIn did by banning Mr. Reyes is silence one of the most rational supporters of Law Enforcement in the United States right now, when his voice is needed more than ever.
But, it’s not politically correct to like the police right now so LinkedIn had to come up with some reason to boot him. What if someone read his content and it made sense to them and they decided they didn’t want to defund the police? The horror!
Mr. Reyes posted an article, a factual article about a CRIMINAL who kidnapped a woman, left her to die and then tried to kill the police who were trying to save the woman. Yep, that’s shocking. It’s shocking that a criminal would do something like that and that’s the only part that’s shocking. It’s not shocking that the police saved the woman and it’s not shocking that they wouldn’t let the criminal kill them.
You know what’s really shocking? It’s shocking that LinkedIn would suppress the views of someone who supports law and order. It is shocking that as workers as LinkedIn sit in their secure building in Sunnyvale, CA or work from home, in their nice houses paid for with their average $124,087 salaries, they prohibit the defense of the very people who protect their security.
Let that sink in a bit because if the police get defunded, you can bet a LinkedIn employee isn’t going to come arrest your robber, but you can bet that if Mr. Reyes saw it happening, he would step in and help you.
For more on the ongoing attacks by LinkedIn… see our article below from just a few weeks ago.
Op-Ed: Is LinkedIn anti-law enforcement? It sure seems it, as they once again shut down a pro-police page.
MANCHESTER, CT – LinkedIn is once again censoring law enforcement content.
Hours after Law Enforcement Today’s National Spokesman Kyle Reyes shared a warning about an Antifa threat to America, the platform shut down his account.
Ironically, the last message Reyes received after warning about the danger… was a racist threat.
After Law Enforcement Today wrote an article about it, LinkedIn reactivated the account.
Hours later… it was shut down – again. No explanation. No warning. Just… gone.
Law Enforcement Today is the largest law enforcement owned and operated media outlet in America. Reyes, and the rest of the Law Enforcement Team, regularly share the content on the platform that they create.
When Reyes logged in this morning, here was the message he received:
It’s not the first time. Over the past several months, LinkedIn has repeatedly “restricted” the account of Reyes and others who have shared law enforcement related content.
It’s worth pointing out that there are nearly a million men and women in America who put on a uniform every day and go into work protecting and serving. Businesses that are kept safe – especially during these riots – by these men and women. The argument that law enforcement related content doesn’t “belong” on LinkedIn is simply wrong.
in February, Reyes’ account was restricted for 10 days for a “fake news” story from LET (as a reminder, there was nothing fake about the report, which you can read here).
Finally, after forcing Reyes to jump through many hoops, which you can read about here, LinkedIn acknowledged that there wasn’t anything fake or misleading about the news being reported and they reinstated his account.
Two weeks later, it happened again.
Just when Reyes finally got his account back after the latest debacle, he posted a story from LET regarding a New York Police Officer receiving a credible death threat, which you can read about here.
The story was shadowbanned, which essentially means blocked without letting the poster (Reyes in this case) know about it.
Reyes posted about the story not being visible, saying:
“15 minutes ago I shared a breaking news article about a credible death threat against NYPD officers. I have tens of thousands of followers on LinkedIn. As of the time of this note, it’s been seen by three people.
“That same article, when posted on another one of our social media outlets, was shared more than 1,000 times in 10 minutes.
“The war on law enforcement is very real…and it’s clear what side this platform is on. What will it take to change? Do you think this is acceptable?”
And guess what? Yep- that posting was also shadowbanned. It wasn’t even visible to himself when he clicked on his own postings.
Last week, .@LinkedIn shut down the account of Law Enforcement Today’s National Spokesman, Kyle Reyes, for sharing an article they called “fake news”. But it was a story backed with video evidence that was widely reported in the press. #LinkedInSuckshttps://t.co/Lnqp2MXo8C
— David Bird (@ScienceJerk1) February 11, 2020
So, Reyes not being one to just lie down and take it, emailed them again. He still had the “Member Safety and Recovery Consultant” email address handy, since less than a week had passed between incidents.
Reyes asked why his account was again being targeted and why his posts were being shadowbanned. Here’s what his message said:
“Can you please explain to me why I’m now being shadowbanned?
Many of my posts aren’t showing up – including when you click on ‘posts.’ As the national spokesman for Law Enforcement Today, we use this platform to make people aware of urgent law enforcement related stories.
For example, tonight I shared an article and a followup post about a credible death threat against NYPD at the request of police officials. The posts were both completely buried.”
WARNING – MUST READ
NYPD COPS ASSASSINATION THREAT- the attached notice has been distributed throughout NYPD Commands. REMAIN ALERT – respond with back up on all 9/11 calls. pic.twitter.com/1EyaXMB0Ep
— SBA (@SBANYPD) February 13, 2020
Here, dear readers, is the response of the century, verbatim:
“Thank you for reaching out about your post.
We work to keep the platform focused on discussions relating to professional interests and activities. Content that doesn’t appear to relate to these topics may not reach a wide audience.
Lastly, any content that doesn’t comply with LinkedIn’s User Agreement and Professional Community Policies may be subject to removal.
However, the post in question should now be visible. If you have any other questions please let me know.”
Um, I have a question: What the hell?
The posting was clearly related to professional interests and activities, seeing as how Reyes is the spokesperson for a law enforcement forum, and the story was regarding threats to a law enforcement officer.
The posting clearly complied with the user agreements and community policies and didn’t have anything inappropriate or unprofessional within it.
The posting was not the problem here.
LinkedIn seemingly having an anti-police agenda is the problem.
Reyes wasn’t even afforded an actual answer as to why the posts were blocked. They didn’t tell him he did anything wrong, or that there was a complaint against it, or anything even close to relevant.
Just their protocol, which was not violated, and then saying they fixed it.
When the “shadow” was removed, the posting received over 17,000 views within a few hours.
Mainstream media likes to paint conservatives as all living in a world of conspiracy theories, saying we make these things up to make them look bad.
But it’s not a conspiracy theory when they basically admit to blocking a prominent pro-police figure for no reason other than his posting being pro-police.
Why is this allowed? If it were the other way around and an anti-police post were blocked, lawsuits would fly, along with bottles and bricks and buckets of water, oh my.
It’s time to hold LinkedIn responsible for their actions.
In case you missed it, here’s the story that’s believed to have gotten the account shut down.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN – The Minnesota National Guard has been armed and is on high alert.
This is after the FBI reportedly warned of a ‘credible, lethal threat’.
Minnestota National Guard’s top general said his soldiers are armed after receiving FBI warning about “credible, lethal threat” against his forces
— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) May 31, 2020
The National Guard’s top general requested military police units from out of state as a result of the threat. He has not requested active-duty forces yet.
Minnesota National Guard’s top general says he has requested military police units from other states, but has not requested active-duty forces yet
— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) May 31, 2020
These threats reportedly came after officials worked to determine if extremist groups had infiltrated police brutality protests across the country.
Definitely hope this doesn’t happen to your humvee pic.twitter.com/S4gw8T5OZX
— THE WETNESS ZONE (@upsetterofchuds) May 29, 2020
Law enforcement is looking into if they deliberately tipped largely peaceful demonstrations toward violence.
Just in: Adjutant General of the Minnesota National Guard Maj. Gen. Jon Jensen says his soldiers are armed & "carrying ammunition" in their magazine pouches based on "a credible lethal threat" to Minn NG conveyed by the FBI on Thursday. Can be upgraded based on local conditions.
— Jack Detsch (@JackDetsch) May 31, 2020
To make matters worse, they’re investigating if foreign adversaries – such as Russia – were behind a growing disinformation campaign on social media.
— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) May 30, 2020
On Saturday, an Antifa activist group put out a message that encouraged people to consider Minnesota National Guard troops “easy targets,” according to two Defense Department officials.
— John D (@thinkthinkthin6) May 31, 2020
The activists were encouraged to steal “kit”, or the weapons and body armor used by the soldiers.
The officials were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, reports one outlet.
Now, soldiers with the Minnesota National Guard have been armed during all missions at protests across the state.
The soldiers are sometimes – but not always – armed. Yet for the past few days, they haven’t been armed as they’ve moved into parts of the state taken over by riots.
In the state, the troops do not currently have the authority to make arrests, and are there to act essentially as extra security for police.
There are currently more than 4,100 National Guard soldiers and airmen in Minneapolis.
Hours after President Trump declared that he’ll be designating Antifa as a terror organization, they reportedly made the ultimate threat – we’re bringing the war to the suburbs.
Now authorities are on high alert.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.
Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!