MINNEAPOLIS – Legal questions remain unanswered as to what will occur after the highly controversial shooting of an Australian woman in Minneapolis over the summer.
We’ve had a police officer both publicly condemned and exonerated, racist remarks from each perspective filling social media, a police chief resign over the controversy, and still no clear cut direction where the case is headed.
And let’s not forget the road signs poking fun at cops.
Moreover, the father of the Australian woman who was fatally shot said he was “deeply concerned” about the state’s investigation into his daughter’s death, reported ABC News.
“We are apprehensive that perhaps the BCA [Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension] has not fulfilled its promise,” John Ruszczyk, the father of Justine Damond, said at a news conference in Sydney this morning.
“We are deeply concerned about the possibility that the initial investigation was not done properly,” he added.
Authorities said Noor and officer Matthew Harrity responded to Damond’s 911 call, but never found a suspect. They were startled by a loud noise before Damond approached the driver’s side of the car and Noor, who was on the passenger side, fired his gun through the open driver’s side window, according to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
Before Chief Janee Harteau resigned, she made comments that fueled speculation.
“Justine didn’t have to die,” she said. “Based on the BCA information, this should not have happened. We’re talking about the actions of one individual,”
Damond, a meditation and yoga instructor, lived in Minneapolis’ Fulton neighborhood with her fiancé, Don Damond. The two were planning to get married in August.
Furthermore, her father’s comments came just days after Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman was recorded on video last week telling activists that he didn’t have enough evidence to charge Noor because investigators “haven’t done their job.”
However, Freeman later issued an apology to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, which is a division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, saying, “I was wrong to discuss both the agency’s work and what discussions we are having internally.”
But Ruszczyk said the prosecutor’s comments were enough to cast doubt on the entire investigation.
“At the least, Mr. Freeman’s comments cast doubt on the description of how Justine’s death occurred as it was initially put out by the BCA and the attorney for the officer driving the squad car,” Ruszczyk said today. “We continue to implore Mr. Freeman and the prosecutor’s office to continue to pursue a rigorous investigation and examination of evidence in the events leading to Justine’s death.
“We expect them to fill in any gaps in the BCA’s work honestly and fairly, but completely,” he added.
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension said in a statement today it is “committed to conducting a fair, impartial and thorough investigation as we gather the facts and evidence in this case.”
“We have consulted with that office from the very beginning of this investigation and will continue to work with them as needed to provide any additional information that they deem appropriate as they review the case,” the statement said.
“This ongoing collaboration between prosecutors and investigators is a typical part of the review process.”
Noor, who has not been charged, has not offered a statement to investigators.
His attorney, Thomas Plunkett, speaking of Freeman’s apology, said he is “just trying to do everything I can to make sure that Officer Noor is treated fairly in this process,” The Associated Press reported Monday.