Leftist New York Times defends educator teaching kids about “porn literacy”

Share:

The following editorial is written by a retired police officer and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today. 

NEW YORK, NY- Wow…just wow. The American Spectator is reporting that the New York Times, in what should be a surprise to nobody, has come out defending a sex educator who earlier this year taught a high school class on “pornography literacy.”

The instructor, Justine Ang Fonte also shared a video with first graders that says, “It’s OK to touch yourself and see how different body parts feel, but it’s best to only do it in private.” Funny that used to be the job of parents!

There were many years ago who believed that gay marriage was only the first step in what would become a litany of depraved demands by the alphabet community.

Those predictions appear to be coming true, as we have seen with the sudden push to “demand tolerance” for everything ranging from pushing transgenderism to accepting there are more than two genders. What we are currently seeing in our public schools is just an extension of that depravity.

As the Spectator notes, this pervert Fonte’s classes are simply another example of inappropriate deviant sexual content being pushed on children and young people by the radical left, parents’ wishes be damned. The Times defense of Fonte’s instruction proves the point. If you want to see what a wackjob she is, go to her website and see for yourself. 

 

In the Times’ defense, reporter Valeriya Safronova wrote that “all” of these classes were “in line with current National Sex Education Standards and the World Health Organization’s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education.” Oh, the WHO is on board? The same people who totally botched all things COVID-19? Count us in!

“Multiple sex educators interviewed for this article,” she wrote, “said there was nothing inappropriate about her classes [at the Dalton School in Manhattan] or at Columbia [Grammar and Preparatory School].”

Among those speaking to Fonte’s work, according to Safronova were five educators, including a Columbia University professor who had  previously worked with Fonte.

One supporter did express concern that parents hadn’t been involved in the provided materials for Fonte’s classes, with another saying that she wouldn’t tell first-grade students it was fine for them to masturbate.

Fonte, a clear far-left loon describes herself on her website as a “student of decolonization” who has “reveled in disrupting health education for 11 years.” Sounds like a normal person grounded in reality. She also noted that here teaching is pushed “through the lens of Kimberle Crenshaw’s teachings on intersectionality.”

Crenshaw, who is on the faculty of UCLA Law School and Columbia Law School, is described as “a leading scholar of critical race theory who developed the theory of intersectionality.” Birds of leftist neo-Marxist feather flock together, apparently.

In describing her porn literacy class, Fonte said it was directed at teenagers as an “intersectional focus on mainstream porn.” Included in the course were photos of nude women in ropes and asked the students to consider the difference between porn and art.

She also provided students with a list of where legal genres of pornography might be obtained, including “incest-themed,” “barely legal,” and “kink and BDSM,” the New York Post reported.

One slide within her presentation showed a woman promoting sites such as OnlyFans, where people sell pornographic pictures and videos of themselves.

In giving cover to the deviant Fonte, the New York Times said:

“Pornography literacy classes teach students how to critically assess what they see on the screen—for example, how to recognize what is realistic and what is not, how to deconstruct implicit gender roles, and how to identify what types of behavior could be a health or safety risk,” it read.

“Though classes on literacy in sexually explicit media are not mainstream, many sex educators support them.”

The material for the first-grade class was equally disturbing. In an animated video shown by Fonte, some first-grade students are shown saying that it feels good to touch their genitals, with one character who appears to be a mother telling them it is OK.

 

The description of the video, created by a sex education organization called AMAZE says:

“It’s quite natural and normal for them to want to touch and explore all parts of their body, including their genitals. In fact, for many children these behaviors become a type of self-soothing, since touching their genitals feels good to them, which, in turn, is a source of comfort.”

Fonte excused the video to the Times:

“ I equip [the first graders] with a way that they can exercise body agency and consent, by knowing exactly what those parts are, what they are called, and how to take care of them. That was paired with lessons around, what are the different ways to say ‘no’?”

The Times claims the usual boogeymen are responsible for the outrage over Fonte’s material, conservative groups who are then promoted in conservative media. They called the attacks part of a “broader clash in education” concerning how sex education and racism are taught in the classroom.

In other words, “It’s a right-wing conspiracy! It’s Q-anon!”

If you think the New York Times isn’t the only leftist news outlet pushing perverted sexual content being pushed on our kids, think again. The far-left Washington Post, owned by Amazon oligarch Jeff Bezos, published an op-ed last week entitled, “Yes, kink belongs at Pride, and I want my kids to see it.”

The writer, Lauren Rowello thinks it’s perfectly normal for bare-chested men to be walking down the street in a parade wearing dark sunglasses and suspenders clipped into a leather thong. Pretty normal, right?

People being led down the street on leashes by yet other people is exactly what kids should be seeing, correct? Hey, according to Rowello, these “perfectly normal” people are just celebrating who they are and what they want to do. Whips and chains? No problem!

Yet they wonder why they cannot be taken seriously.

As Ben Shapiro of Daily Wire recently said while slamming Rowello’s op-ed:

 

“The line from her to pedophilia is pretty straight. I mean it’s a pretty straight line from ‘It is good for kids to watch kink so that they can explore their own sexual feelings’ to ‘Why can’t they consent to actually exploring their sexual feelings with people?’”

 Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Earlier this year, Law Enforcement Today reported on a second-grade class in Greenwich, Connecticut which was also exposed to derelict sexual content in a classroom. For more on that, we invite you to:

DIG DEEPER

GREENWICH, CT- Maybe having the public schools closed isn’t a bad idea after all. For parents in Greenwich, Connecticut, they might want to reconsider their children’s participation in the public school system given what we are about to report.

According to numerous news sources, including the New York Post, a lesson for second graders—children who would be either 7 or 8 years old—included a video which showed a cartoon of a full erect men’s sexual organ, according to a report.

We have included the video further along in this story.

Students were shown a video cartoon entitled “Alfred Jr. & Shadow: A Short Story About Being Scared” during a virtual class dealing with social and emotional learning, the Greenwich Free Press reported. At least with the class being virtual as opposed to in-person, parents might have a clue exactly what kind of garbage was being taught to their children.

In the cartoon which lasts about 10 minutes, a film typically used for therapy sessions, it shows two cartoon owls who are talking about frightening experiences for children, which also includes “stuff that’s very difficult to talk about.”

The video then switches over to an image of a silhouetted man with an erect penis standing over a child, who not surprisingly looks distraught.

As the video plays, there is a voice-over which tells the kids that some “children have experienced an adult touching or putting their penis in the child’s private parts or mouth,” saying they’re “terrified that this will happen again.”

 

Not enough to have the image even briefly on the screen, it is there for nearly nine seconds until it cuts to other scenarios, including parents who are drunk, on drugs or physically abusive.

Needless to say, some parents were livid. Fortunately this garbage was shown during a virtual lesson, so parents had the opportunity to see what kind of crap their 7-year-olds were being exposed to.

“In my hometown, in my daughter’s age group class of second grade, they showed an animated video today of a man with an ERECTION standing over a child!!!!!” tweeted Carl Higbie, parent of a Greenwich Schools student.

“This is not OK!!!!” he wrote.

Higbie, a local conservative political commentator complained to the Free Press that his own second-grade daughter had not seen the video, however he said that “numerous” disgusted parents had contacted him. He called for whomever is responsible to be fired.

“That somebody thought this video was acceptable for second graders was abhorrent,” he told the Free Press.

According to The Blaze, the film is described as “an educational film for children aged 6-14 years. The children learn about different ways of being scared, what they need when they were scared and suggestions for actions. Adults also get some tips on how to meet a child who is scared.”

In an email to second grade families, Greenwich Superintendent of Schools Dr. Toni Jones acknowledged the film may have been appropriate for that age group.

“Around the midway point in the video there is reference to situations in which children may become afraid, including being afraid of abuse, both physical and sexual. The content at this point in the video was not appropriate for our GPS [Greenwich Public Schools] second grade classrooms.”

The Free Press reported she also added “that the content was instead likely meant for a private therapy session for children who have experienced trauma.”

The Post reported that parents were offered help from school psychology staff on how to discuss the video’s contents with their child, and also the Department of Children and Families was notified as to the video’s showing.

In a statement to Gateway Pundit, Higbie said the teacher(s) responsible either “didn’t care enough to review this before playing it” or “thought it was ok.”

The Post noted the second-graders were in classrooms run by a Ms. Goodwin and Ms. Hanzlik, as reported in the Free Press with no further elaboration.

This is why it is important for parents to know what their children are being taught in school. One positive thing that has come out of virtual learning is parents are now more aware of what is going on in our public schools. 

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Last year, Law Enforcement Today reported on Connecticut schools using curriculum which bashes law enforcement. This came after the George Floyd overdose death in Minneapolis which was blamed on the police department. For more on that, we invite you to:

DIG DEEPER

THIS IS AN UPDATE TO AN EARLIER STORY. THIS APPEARS TO BE A STATEWIDE PROBLEM

Editor’s note: Most of our team at Law Enforcement Today is comprised of either parents or cops.  The anger we felt upon seeing what ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS were about to be indoctrinated with was beyond words.  Please help us make sure everyone sees this ASAP – this is unacceptable.  These are our KIDS.

CROMWELL, CT – This is, no doubt, an extremely challenging time for the law enforcement community. 

The incident in Minneapolis has affected all of us, whether you work in a small town or a large city.  The ripple effect has spanned globally and will forever change how we police. 

I, like the majority of law enforcement professionals, denounced the actions of those individuals.  Their behavior was not a representation of our profession, and we do not condone police brutality. 

I would have never thought that after serving for years as a police officer, I would feel compelled to write an article about the following issue in a law enforcement publication. 

We, as law enforcement, know that everyone has an opinion on how we do our jobs.  The one area I would never have expected to see anti-police sentiment is our public school system, especially not in an elementary school. 

For those of you with children, you know that distance learning has been a challenge.  My daughter is a 10-year-old in fourth grade at a public elementary school in Cromwell.

The school has done a decent job keeping parents up-to-date on curriculum information. To help parents better communicate with teachers, the application Bloomz has been used.  On Saturday morning, I received an alert from the Bloomz application. 

My daughter’s teacher posted information about next week’s curriculum and how they were going to address the unfolding events in our country.  The teacher wanted the parents to know they planned on covering social injustice and racial equality during their daily Zoom meetings. 

I admit that I typically do not read through the majority of messages from the school, but something caught my attention on this one. 

On Monday, her class was going to review a YouTube video titled: Something Happened in Our Town.  Curious about the content, I reluctantly watched the video. 

After school, Emma asked her mother: “Why did the police shoot that man?”

“It was a mistake,” said her mother.

“I feel sad for the man and his family.”

“Yes, the police thought he had a gun,” said her father.

“It wasn’t a mistake,” said her sister, Liz. “The cops shot him because he was Black.”

I made it to the 1:54 mark before my blood began to boil, and I felt sick to my stomach.  The video only got worse and was filled with anti-police propaganda.  The overall message of racial equality was lost due to the inaccurate, and quite hurtful, representation of law enforcement.

The video is at the bottom of the article.  If you aren’t able to get through the whole thing, or even half of it, we will absolutely not blame you. It’s seriously disturbing and completely wrong.

“But he won’t go to jail,” said his father.

“Why not?” asked Josh.

“Cops stick up for each other,” said Josh’s brother, Malcolm. “And they don’t like Black men.”

Josh was confused. “Why not? Some police are Black.”

Making white children feel guilty that their ancestors owned slaves, making them feel guilty for being born white, is the opposite of equality. It’s saying that they are below black people.

And telling a black child that all police hate black people is perpetuating a cycle of hatred and division.

“There are many cops, Black and White, who make good choices,” said his father. “But we can’t always count on them to do what’s right.”

It’s telling black children that they have to fear police, particularly white police, and it’s subconsciously telling them that they will never be good enough to be on the same “level” as white people in society.

Yes, my friends, both of the above circumstances are both presented in the video, just in case you were too sickened to actually watch it, which, again, we couldn’t blame you for.

Yes, schools have to educate our children about the issues at hand, but they have to do it with objective information that is free from personal opinion and judgment.  This video bypassed all reasoning and was full of subjective and explicit bias that is not supported by facts or evidence. 

What is the educational value in telling children that police officers are not held accountable because “cops stick up for each other,” and “they don’t like black men?”   

All this does is promote fear and distrust in children towards law enforcement. 

School Resource Officers generally do a fantastic job building a strong relationship with children based on trust.  This video goes against everything we try to instill in them in that particular age group. 

It’s absurd and disgusting that the book was written to begin with, and even more so that someone decided to put it up as a YouTube video. But, of course that’s their First Amendment right.

But then for a public school to interject the prejudice into an elementary school? That more than crosses a line.

I have shared this video with numerous law enforcement connections and those in the educational field.  Everyone had the same reaction: This should not be shown to children and it is highly inappropriate. 

Of course we need to discuss current events with our children, including racial equality.  However, there must be better educational material available to teach children about the importance of racial equality that is free from anti-police propaganda. 

This idea floating around that supporting both racial equality and law enforcement are mutually exclusive is absurd! And to indoctrinate the notion to our young children is even more so.

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and veterans called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing their untold stories. Click to check it out.

Murdered officer's grave desecrated before headstone even placed

The vast majority of police officers take our oaths seriously and perform our duties with dignity and respect.  We do not condone corrupt cops, and we stand against police brutality.

Teaching our children to hate law enforcement is a huge slap in the face and should not be tolerated or accepted by the American people, no matter what pigment their skin may be.

The producer of the video, Niagra Falls Underground Railroad Heritage Center, should be completely ashamed of themselves. Of course, they won’t be, especially with comments on their YouTube channel encouraging the book and the reading.

One user, MissRobertsOMP, says:

“Thank you so much! This is so helpful to me to help my fourth graders understand what’s going on when we can’t discuss it the way I’d like to because of distance learning. I really appreciate you taking the time to do this for us.”

Jaclyn Preto says:

“This is so amazing! Thank you, I cannot wait to share this with my students.”

Luckily, the teachers at the school complained and the superintendent has removed the video from the curriculum. However, it remains to be seen what will be offered in its place.

If we as parents, and as Americans, don’t speak up and stop this kind of disgusting propaganda being pushed onto our children, our nation will never heal.

We will never live in unity because there will always be divide. There will always be someone telling our kids that they aren’t good enough, that they never will be good enough. Black or white.

Law Enforcement Today encourages you, whether or not you’re a parent, whether or not you’re an officer, to pay close attention to what’s being taught or offered at your child’s school.

Public schools have been pushing agendas on our children slowly but steadily for the past couple of decades. It’s up to us to be vigilant and make sure they’re not being brainwashed.

Here is the video. It’s not an exaggeration to warn you that regardless of what race your family is, this video should not be watched around children.

UPDATE:

On June 17, 2020, Sgt. John Krupinsky, President of the Connecticut State Fraternal Order of Police issued a press release as follows. This letter refers to the same video shown in Cromwell also being utilized in Granby, Connecticut:

It has come to the attention of the Connecticut State Fraternal Order of Police that several school systems throughout Connecticut have been distributing materials to both students and parents that are clearly outrageous and biased against police officers.

These materials are not factual and do not represent what Connecticut police officers stand for and clearly not how they do their job. Upon reviewing one of these videos, I was disgusted by its content and couldn’t understand how this could even be produced.

This video, Something Happened in Our Town https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whR_Jlzknpo was found to be listed on the Wells Road Elementary School website in the Town of Granby.

Parents received an email with a list of reference videos this being one of them to show to their children. These are direct quotes from the video. “The cop shot him because he was black;” “And they [meaning cops] don’t like black men.”

I find this totally outrageous for a school to be putting this out to young children who are impressionable. As police officers we spend a lot of time going into school systems throughout the state to spend time with young children and make a good impression.

Officers are encouraged to attend recess, play ball with the kids and be a positive role model for them. A school putting out a video like this undermines all that work.

They are not bridging the gap between the community and the police they are widening it. Those involved with this video should have swift action taken against them by their school system and town as I would assume they do not represent what they stand for.

This is a time that everyone must come together to try and bridge the gap between the police and the community, not tear it down.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

 

 

 

Share:
Submit a Correction
Related Posts