Rock painted with Confederate flag in woman’s driveway could cost her the custody of her multiracial child


ALBANY, NY- A rock near a woman’s driveway in Upstate New York could affect the custody case of her multiracial daughter. 

According to reports, the woman has been told that she needs to remove the rock that is painted with the Confederate flag or risk losing the custody if her multiracial child, even though a family court judge did not consider the painted rock to be an issue when it was originally raised during trial. 

On Thursday, May 6th, the Appellate Division’s Third Department in Albany, wrote in the ruling:

“Given that the child is of mixed race, it would seem apparent that the presence of the flag is not in the child’s best interests, as the mother must encourage and teach the child to embrace her mixed race identity, rather than thrust her into a world that only makes sense through the tortured lens of cognitive dissonance.”

The judges stated that the “presence of the confederate flag,” when “viewed pragmatically,” is a symbol of inflaming the already strained relationship between the parties. The judges ruled that if the woman does not remove the painted rock by June 1st, she could jeopardize the custody of her child:

“Its continued presence shall constitute a change in circumstances and Family Court shall factor this into any future best interests analysis.”

The documents reportedly identify the parents as Christie and Isaiah, no last name released. The couple have had joint legal custody of the girl, born in 2014, but the mother now wants the dad to only see his daughter every other weekend and the father wants sole custody.

Allegedly, the father raised the issue of the rock previously during their custody trial and he made a broader argument to the court that his home was more suitable for the young girl.

The case made its way to the appellate court, which brought the rock to the forefront of the dispute. The judges wrote in the ruling:

“Although not addressed by Family Court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence, reveal that she has a small confederate flag painted on a rock near her driveway.”

Jason Leifer, the attorney representing the young child, said that it was like the appellate judges “pulled something out of a hate” because the rock was never the subject of the parents’ disagreements. He said:

“Bringing politics into the Family Court is probably the worst possible thing you could do and it seems like that’s what the appellate division has opened the door to. Hopefully it’ll be fixed by the Court of Appeals.”

In December 2020, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a law preventing the sale of confederate flags and other “hate symbols” such as the swastika, on state property. The law also severely limits the flag’s display unless deemed relevant to serving an educational or historical purpose.

Regardless of its symbolism, Michael Stutman, an attorney specializing in matrimonial law and the current chair of the New York City Bar Association’s Matrimonial Law Committee said that he thinks the judges made a “very dangerous statement.” He added:

“I think it is a rather astonishing extension of wokeness in now that the door seems to be opening that someone’s political viewpoint reflects on their fitness as a parent. It is one of the clearest infringements on someone’s free speech by the state to have a court threaten to restrict a parents’ rights to their child based upon the propriety of a person’s political beliefs.”

He continued:

“I don’t think that such a decision would ever stand constitutional change. You could easily find a conservative court saying that a person who flies a rainbow pride flag on their front door is an unfit parent because that judge does not believe in sexual choices, say, that are beyond that of just males and females. I think it was a real error.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

As Americans struggle to survive, politicians introduce $150 million bill to remove Confederate statues

February 27th, 2021

WASHINGTON, DC – Illinois Democratic Representative Bobby Rush introduced a bill this month to provide $150 million to “remove and replace” Confederate monuments as American families face the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

The “Rejecting and Eliminating the Foul Use of Symbols Exulting Confederate Principles Act,” or “REFUSE Confederate Principals Act” was introduced on February 1, which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.

The bill, also known as H.R. 672, would pay grants to the National Park Service for the removal of Confederate statues and symbols from public places.

The bill aims to:

“Direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish a grant program to provide funds for the removal of Confederate symbols.

The Secretary, in consultation with the Director, shall establish, within the National Park Service, a program to be known as the ‘Emancipation Historic Preservation Program’ to award grants to eligible entities.”

If passed, the bill would direct the removal of Confederate symbols and replace them with alternative monuments, memorials, statues, commemorative structures, symbols, or signage.

The bill specifically calls for alternative monuments or symbols to “commemorate or depict the freedom of enslaved African Americans.”

Removed statues and other symbols would be moved to state historic preservation programs for storage under the bill.

The bill authorizes the appropriation of $15 million federal dollars to the program every year until 2031. None of the funds provided in the bill would be permitted for use in the preservation, repair, or new construction of Confederate symbols.

The proposed bill defines a “confederate symbol” as:

“A Confederate flag or a monument, memorial, statue, memorative structure, symbol, or signage that honors a Confederate leader, Confederate soldier, the Confederate States of America, or the Confederacy in general.”

The $150 million price tag comes as the United States’ economic situation struggles through the Covid-19 pandemic, and American families struggle with high unemployment, business loss, and illness.

Unemployment is worse than that during the 2008 recession, and 4% growth in the fourth quarter following 33.4% growth in the third quarter has not been enough to offset the contraction seen in the second quarter of 2020.

The most recent gross domestic product rate was 4.0% for the fourth quarter and is slowly recovering from the worst contraction in U.S. history when the second-quarter rate was -31.4%.

Manufacturing lost 1.3 million jobs in April and is a key indicator of a recession.

Although manufacturing shows signs of a slow recovery, the improvements are nowhere near what is needed to replace the massive job losses.

The unemployment rate rested at 6.7% in December and remained unchanged from November.

The economy lost 140,000 jobs in December. Prior to December, unemployment had been rising since the crushing loss of 20.5 million jobs attributed to the pandemic in April 2020.  At that time, unemployment hit 14.7%.

Tens of millions of Americans across the country are struggling to make ends meet in a democracy decimated by the pandemic and related lockdowns and business closures.

Rep. Rush initially introduced his REFUSE bill in 2020, where it sat in committee. At the time, Rush said it was time to remove the symbols:

“It is past time that we eradicate these totems of treason and replace them with symbols that represent the true promise of America, such as the emancipation of Black Americans. 

“My bill, the REFUSE Confederate Principles Act, would do just that by creating the Emancipation Historic Preservation program, which would provide grants for removing the false idols of the Confederacy and replacing them with symbols and structures that we can actually be proud of.”

Democratic U.S. Sen. Cory Booker and Sen. Mike Lee re-introduced a bill last week calling for the removal of Confederate statues from the U.S. Capitol. The bill was brought up last year and was opposed by then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky). Sen. McConnell said:

“What I do think is clearly a bridge too far is this nonsense that we need to airbrush the Capitol and scrub out everybody from years ago who had any connection to slavery.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity
Lincoln and Roosevelt statues toppled in downtown Portland during ‘day of rage’ protest: Portland police arrest 26

October 12, 2020

PORTLAND, OR- Authorities declared a riot in downtown Portland after a large group of violent demonstrators marched through the South Park Blocks, vandalizing and toppling statues of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt.

Rioters did not stop there as they broke windows at the Oregon Historical Society building in downtown Portland.

According to reports, protesters met under the Burnside Bridge and marched to the South Park Blocks for what they declared an “Indigenous Peoples Day of Rage.”

Allegedly, there were social media posts calling for an “end” of colonialism and for the abolishment of the police. Just before 9 p.m., on Sunday, October 11th, police tweeted that a “mass gathering” had formed at Southwest Park Avenue and Southwest Madison Street.

Police reported that the protesters were trying to pull down a statue with a chain.

Authorities warned the protesters that anyone involved in criminal behavior, including vandalism, was subject to arrest. The Oregonian reported that the organizers of the violent protest signaled their aggressive stance for the night calling for “direct action”.

In addition, the organizers demanded that the video live-streamers and photographers who have become staples of such events to stay away. People in the crowd were repeatedly told not to film. Individuals who passed by the destruction were ordered by demonstrators to stop filming or delete photographs. 

The demonstrators were extremely violent towards those who were caught filming. In fact, an apartment resident had lasers shined at his eyes and a liquid thrown in his face when they saw him shooting a video of the scene from his terrace.

After downing the statues of Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln, members in the crowd began smashing windows of local buildings.

The group hung a banner that said, “Stop honoring racist colonizer murders.” A mural on the Sovereign Hotel building depicting the Lewis & Clark expedition was splattered with red paint.

Video from the toppled statues show that they had been vandalized with the words “Stolen Land” and “Murderer” spray-painted at their bases. 

At 9:40 p.m., police declared a riot after getting additional reports of damage. They told the crowd to disperse immediately. 

The group, nearly 200 strong, marched through downtown Portland, at one point occupying all four lanes of West Burnside Street. Most of the demonstrators were dressed in all black, from head-to-toe. Many wore body armor, carried shields, and wielded night sticks or other weapons.

Authorities reported that 26 people were arrested by Portland police officers after protesters gathered outside the bureau’s North Precinct and blocked streets into the late hours on Saturday night. On that night, October 10th, the North Precinct was targeted again by violent protesters.

It has been targeted numerous times over the past 130-plus nights by violent protests, including some that devolved into riots, arson fires, and violent attacks on officers. The Portland Police Bureau (PPB) had been informed that the gathering on Saturday, October 10th as well as Sunday, October 11th were “direct action” events.

There were multiple warnings broadcast over loudspeaker and social media by the PPB:

“To those who gathered near North Precinct, NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd is open to vehicular traffic. Immediately vacate the roadway and proceed to the sidewalk. Additionally, do not participate in criminal activity. Those who do not move off NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd will be subject to citation, arrest, or force.”

“If you remain in the roadway and show the intent to engage in physical resistance to removal, of if emergency circumstances require, you may be subject to the use of crowd control agents, including, but not limited to tear gas and impact weapons. Move to the sidewalk now.”

According to PPB, 26 people were arrested with charges including interfering with a peace officer, disorderly conduct in the second degree, resisting arrest, and carrying a concealed weapon. 



Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
Facebook Follow First
Submit a Correction
Related Posts