The following editorial is written by a current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.
No, this is not referencing an article from The Onion…or the Babylon Bee.
An article in the far-left home of moonbats and psychopaths, the Huffington Post (or is it now HuffPo?) actually suggests that perhaps, a small nuclear war could reverse…wait for it…global warming.
They. Are. Fucking. Insane.https://t.co/uz148VAWvV
— E=MC Hammertime (@scs_real) February 28, 2022
In worshiping at the altar of global warming (we thought it was now “climate change”), a writer suggested that perhaps a small nuclear war (what exactly is a “small” nuclear war?) could maybe work to cool off the atmosphere. The radiation poisoning? Maybe the masks suggested by FEMA can help with that.
According to the article, scientists from NASA and a number of other institutions have modeled the effects of a war involving only a Hiroshima level bomb, or about three-tenths of one percent of the world’s current nuclear arsenal, National Geographic reported.
Everything within 4.4 miles of the Hiroshima bomb was incinerated. It was felt 40 miles away. The co-pilot of plane that dropped the bomb said "My God, what have we done?" Today's weapons are up to 3000 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Before / after pic: pic.twitter.com/XFcnO8gN2L
— Ellie Mae O'Hagan (@elliemaeohagan) March 2, 2022
Research apparently shows that five million metric tons of black carbon would be released in the lowest portion of the atmosphere. NASA models suggest the result could be…global cooling!!! Hallelujah! Tell AOC! Tell John Kerry!
National Geographic reported:
In NASA climate models, this carbon then absorbed solar heat and, like a hot air balloon, quickly lofted even higher, where the soot would take much longer to clear from the sky.
But hey, who cares that a few million people would be killed? After all, when you’re worshiping at the altar of the climate change Gods, it’s a small sacrifice to make in order to cool down that 1/100th of a degree.
National Geographic even admits such a nuclear attack would be “catastrophic,” HuffPo said, but a “small-scale [nuclear] war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.”
This is the mindset of the unhinged radical left. Actually suggesting that a nuclear war isn’t such a bad thing if it has the effect of dropping those damn global warming temps. But wait, there’s more! In the tropics??? Temps could fall 5.4 to 7.2 degrees F.
Wonder what that might do to wildlife, forestation, crops, and so on? Who cares, right? It’s all about that “climate emergency.” After all, AOC said we only had twelve years left…and that was three years ago.
Well, according to AOC we've got twelve years left, lets make the best out of it then! 😂😂😂 https://t.co/koNEjWgvr4
— TO (@TVB37801) January 22, 2019
C’mon people, the clock is ticking! Time to provoke a nuclear war! Thanks God for Putin! He may be the savior for the planet after all!
But then, TIME magazine had to step in and go all buzz kill on NatGeo, NASA and HuffPo. TIME admitted that the disaster of a nuclear engagement over reversing climate change is a “more imminent concern,” HuffPo reported. According to TIME:
…even a small exchange of nuclear weapons—between 50-100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, which India and Pakistan already have in their arsenal—would produce enough soot and smoke to block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history.
Dammit, are you kidding? Do you mean by eliminating global warming we’re going to produce climate change? Where the hell is Greta Thunberg? How dare you!
how dare you… pic.twitter.com/bptz3nVpjw
— Brian Doyle (@sonof100maniacs) February 24, 2022
HuffPo admitted the “extreme weather caused by even a mild nuclear winter” wouldn’t be a good thing for the planet, and would have “a tremendous effect on crops and famines,” which would also include ‘a 10 percent decrease in precipitation,” National Geographic reported. They also note that the excess soot in the atmosphere could further harm the ozone layer, “allowing more ultraviolet rays to reach Earth.”
Ok, so let’s get this straight. HuffPo initially suggests a “small nuclear war” would cool the planet, while mere paragraphs later suggests that it wouldn’t. But that’s ok, the writer of the HuffPo piece has it all figured out.
“The cons seem to outweigh the pros in the event of global cooling caused by even a small nuclear war.”
Thank you Dean Praetorius, otherwise known as Captain Obvious.
For more on the conflict in Ukraine, we invite you to:
The following contains within editorial content which is the opinion of the writer.
USA- This week, the New York Times published an article claiming that American intelligence and diplomatic assets from the State Department shared intelligence with Chinese officials in three months leading up to Vladimir Putin’s directive to invade Ukraine, The Conservative Treehouse (TCT) reports.
The gist of the piece was that the U.S. was attempting to convince China in December, January, and February to get involved and convince Russia not to cross over into Ukraine.
At first blush, this appears to smack of abject incompetence by the Biden administration, as TCT reports, i.e. “why would the Biden team think China would not share the intelligence with” Russia, etc.
However as the piece suggests, what if it wasn’t incompetence on the part of Biden’s team, but intentional? It is important to know, in order to determine if the administration was, in fact trying to bait Putin into doing exactly what he did.
What if, the author suggests, the U.S. wanted China to share the intelligence with Moscow? Why would they do so?
In order to gain an understanding, TCT goes back to conversations between Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
First, from Reuters, December 9, 2021:
“U.S. President Joe Biden assured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Kyiv’s bid to join the NATO military alliance was in its own hands, Zelenskyy’s chief of staff said after the two leaders spoke on Thursday.
“Biden and Zelenskyy had a call two days after Biden held talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to try to defuse a crisis over Russian troop movements near Ukraine’s borders. [emphasis added]
For anyone who has been following the saga between Russia and Ukraine, the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO was a self-described “red line” for Putin. Yet, in December 2021, Biden signaled to the Ukrainian president that if his country wanted into NATO, they were in. It was “in its own hands,” not that of the U.S., the implication being the U.S. and other NATO allies would approve.
According to the Times, this all came about at the same time when US intelligence and the State Department were talking to China about the Russian troop buildup near the Ukrainian border.
From the TCT report:
“The Biden administration is not stupid enough to tell Zelenskyy he’s about to enter NATO without knowing this would trigger a definitive military response from Putin.
“There’s only one way to look at this. The Biden administration was purposefully baiting Putin, and provoking Putin to invade Ukraine, because the team around Biden wanted Putin to invade Ukraine.”
That of course leads to the obvious question: Why would people surrounding Biden want to provoke Putin into a conflict with Ukraine?
In order to understand why the administration (or its handlers) would want to provoke a conflict, it’s important to understand what motivates the ruling class in the country, which TCT seems to nail perfectly.
Look at what is going on domestically. Biden’s poll numbers are in the tank, his agenda is collapsing before his eyes, the economy is in tatters and the psyche of the American people is damaged. What better than an international crisis to take the American people’s eyes off the ball?
“The crisis actually helps advance the goals and objectives of domestic policy in multiple ways.”
Look at the agenda of the Biden administration and their handlers in the Democratic Party. Soaring energy costs are exactly what they want; after all it is part of the Green New Deal agenda.
Has anyone wondered why Biden was the choice of the Democratic party after none of their real desired candidates drew traction with the American people? Because they knew due to his age, he was likely a one-term president.
Simply put, there was no concern for “political damage.” Once Democrats also gained control of the Senate by whichever means they were able to, the plan was set in motion.
It was only by the sheer dumb luck that included among the Democrats were two Senators with more than a couple of brain cells to rub together—Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ). They have served as a roadblock which slowed down the momentum of the radical left.
Look at who Biden has surrounded himself with? All radical leftist retreads from the Obama administration. Obama had always said he wished he could have a third term—looks like he got his wish with Biden.
“Build Back Better”—the plan which Democrats have hitched their wagon to—is another name for the Great Reset. With the backdrop of a crisis in Europe, it is hoped that Americans are asleep for just long enough for the leftists to push through their ultimate end game with the American people not noticing until it’s too late.
We’ve already seen some individuals, including Biden talking about the “shared pain and sacrifice” that may be coming for the American people. Currently, that is being talked about in the form of continued escalating energy prices.
This is being pushed even though that with the stroke of a pen, Biden could accomplish two things—make Putin’s control of a portion of our oil supply irrelevant—and bring our energy costs back to earth, where they were until he was inaugurated.
He has shown zero interest in doing so.
“Through this prism of consequence, all of the negative domestic outcomes from Russia entering Ukraine and our responses therein, are not viewed as bad outcomes. These consequences are domestic and economic pains to be embraced, not avoided. After all, the people delivering these outcomes will never, themselves, feel any of it.”
Biden’s initial sanctions on Russia were deemed “tepid,” and were widely criticized as not being severe enough.
Talking heads all across the media and throughout much of government started parroting the removal of Russia from the SWIFT financial exchanges, which was promptly done on Sunday. What will that result in?
TCT believes that Russia, China, and Iran will respond to Russia being blocked from the financial system, likely through the launch of a counter trade currency as a means to work around the petro-dollar.
Under that scenario, it wouldn’t take long before one of two things happen—either the dollar is significantly weakened, or—it is removed as the global trade currency. If that were to happen, it would be “game over for the United States of America as we know it.”
Remember just days away from the 2008 election, when then-candidate Barack Obama said, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America?”
Fast forward thirteen and a half years, and the Biden-Obama administration is well on their way to doing just that.
Look at what they have accomplished since Derek Chauvin put his knee to the side of George Floyd’s neck.
Look at how they have managed to demonize parents who love and cherish their children, by likening them to domestic terrorists for the “crime” of being interested in their children’s education.
See how they’ve been able to demonize police while lifting criminals up as martyrs?
Look how they’ve normalized what used to be called sexual deviance.
Finally, look at how they’ve been able to marshal the media, big tech, and government to lay waste to our basic constitutional rights.
The collapse of the United States is their goal, TCT writes and by all measures, which appears to be exactly what they are trying to do. Implementation of SWIFT sanctions on Russia is but another “cog in the machine” in their march to fundamentally destroy our country, if Russia, China, and Iran acts as they are expected to, that goal will be accomplished.
“Why would the people in/around Biden want to manipulate information, stoke, trigger and provoke Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine?”
This could be the reason why. Or maybe Biden is just that incompetent.
For more on The Great Reset and Build Back Better, we invite you to read our prior reporting on it.
This article contains editorial content written by a retired Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.
WASHINGTON, DC- Have you seen Biden’s slogan, “Build Back Better?” Sound innocent enough, right? However, if you dig a little bit, it is a lot more onerous than it sounds.
Have you seen the willingness of a significant portion of the American people…around 50%…to accept without question restrictions placed on their personal liberty, regardless of the constitutional implications? We’ve said it for a while now…we are being played. This was information the American people should have known months ago.
Have you heard about “The Great Reset?” It’s apparently been trending on Twitter. Breitbart News published a piece and every American who cares about the future of our country and our autonomy as a representative republic need to pay attention.
In short, the Great Reset is a plan to completely transform the world’s economy. If you have been at all suspicious about the unleashing of the coronavirus on the world, you have good reason to be. This plan would realistically implement a New World Order, make no mistake about it.
The plan is there would be no money, no private property, and certainly no democracy. This plan would implement a system whereby every key decision made would be decided by, as James Delingpole writing in Breitbart calls a “remote, unaccountable elite of ‘experts.’”
Lest you think these are the rantings of a lunatic or something along those lines, the World Economic Forum has an entire plan surrounding The Great Reset. In short, the plan is a communist’s dream.
In part, the agenda would “steer the market toward fairer outcomes.” Sound familiar? The week before the election, Sen. Kamala Harris, the could-be vice president proposed exactly that. Not equality of opportunity but equity of outcomes.
The first component of The Great Reset would require world governments to “improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements and create the conditions for a ‘stakeholder economy.’” All of this is of course due to the “reset” place on worldwide economies due to the pandemic.
The second component requires that investments (read taxes) would advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.
This would be to fund “ambitious economic stimulus plans.” This would include building “’green’ urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics.”
Finally, the third component is to “harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges.” [emphasis added] They propose to join forces such as has been done during the COVID outbreak to take such efforts and expand them to every sector.
They say “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable [emphasis added], and more prosperous future. Yeah, sign us up!
As Delingpole states, some would accuse people talking about such a plot as being conspiracy theorists—however as noted above, with the World Economic Forum being transparent about the plan, as well as other public officials, they aren’t even hiding what their plans are.
As an example, they cite Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Trudeau actually publicly spoke of The Great Reset and the video went viral on Twitter. Trudeau extolled the coronavirus pandemic as an opportunity for a reset, quoting the World Economic Forum plans.
Oh, and he also used the term “Build Back Better.” Think that was an accident by Biden’s handlers? Apparently not so much.
Justin Trudeau calling the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity for a reset as per the WEF, and parroting the ‘build back better’ line which Biden just so happened to use as a campaign slogan.
Must all be a coincidence and not at all coordinated.pic.twitter.com/O406Cy5I8N
— Acclaimed Journalist (@Jonathan_Witt) November 15, 2020
“Building Back Better means giving support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs.
Canada is here to listen and to help. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset [emphasis added].
This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine our economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.”
Delingpole says that such “meaningless garbage” is something that might be expected from a far-left zealot like Justin Trudeau.
However Trudeau’s words actually do mean things: “Building Back Better”; “2030 Agenda”; “Sustainable Development and the SGGs”; and “reset” which are all, he says, buzzwords for a complete transformation of the world economy which would create…wait for it…a New World Order.
The slogan “Build Back Better” sounded like just a dumb little ditty that Biden came up with while eating Hot Pockets in his basement instead of campaigning like most real presidential candidates do. However, it is literally the slogan of the Great Reset.
Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
Ever heard of Davos? You may have. There is a summit held their every year where all the rich people go to try to decide how they’re going to suppress the peasants.
The slogan “Build Back Better” was coined by a man named Klaus Schwab. Schwab, now in his eighties is a German who actually founded the World Economic Forum. Delingpole says that it has been said that Davos is “where billionaires go to lecture millionaires how ordinary people live.”
Up until recently, Davos has been panned in the past as an event where the beautiful people with money to burn show up in “private jets and their limousines to expound on the importance of sustainability and saving the planet.” In other words, a bunch of hypocrites.
However, COVID presented an opportunity, just as it has given the ruling class in the United States, otherwise known as governors and mayors, to see exactly how far they can push their subjects before they break.
As we have seen, that appears to be for at least half the subjects pretty far. In fact, not only have they used fear to achieve compliance, but they have also made it so those who offer resistance are pilloried by the cowards who don’t.
Delingpole notes that COVID has given the “perfect pretext for the kind of coordinated globalist takeover” which heretofore would have been thought not possible.
Just look at what has happened just this week with Thanksgiving. Governors and mayors have ordered residents NOT to have Thanksgiving celebrations and are mandating restrictions within people’s OWN homes. And some people have zero problem with it.
We would venture to think that if this was 1773 in Boston, these people wouldn’t be participating in dumping tea into Boston Harbor.
Schwab has, in fact admitted that the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies”—in short, he says every industry must “be transformed…we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
In fact, Schwab noted how it was possible to get people to “make radical changes to our lifestyles.” He even referred to it as a “silver lining of the pandemic.” He noted how “almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.”
The World Economic Forum, speaking “of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: ‘Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.’” And Biden’s slogan is just about getting our economy back where it was before coronavirus, right?
Delingpole notes the coronavirus has merely accelerated the drive toward the Great Reset. He had reported earlier on the fact that Schwab had actually written several books about the plan:
“His latest, called Covid-19: The Great Reset, makes no bones about the fact that the chaos of the Coronavirus pandemic represents the perfect opportunity to accelerate the entire world towards a ‘new normal.’
“At the timer of this writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally. Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is never. Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.
“Got that? As far as your new globalist overlords are concerned, you are NEVER going to get your old life back, however much you might wish it. Also, bel clear: this is being done for your own good because your old way of life was based on a ‘broken’ model.
“Such is the authors conviction that the new normal is what we need and should want, he scarcely bothers to pretend that Chinese coronavirus is anything other than a handy pretext.
“Unlike certain past epidemics, COVID-19 doesn’t pose a new existential threat.
“Schwab is clear in his book that coronavirus is not so much a crisis as an opportunity to be exploited—a chance to accelerate the birth of the New World Order he calls ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution.’
“Radical changes of such consequence are coming that some pundits have referred to a ‘before coronavirus’ (BC) and ‘after coronavirus’ (AC) era. We will continue to be surprised by both the rapidity and unexpected nature of these changes—as they conflate with each other, they will provoke second-, third-, fourth- and more-order consequences, cascading effects and unforeseen outcomes.”
Think Biden using the term “Build Back Better” as his campaign slogan was an accident? Breitbart notes that conservatives in the UK feature the website on their Twitter page. Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the UK has inserted the phrase into his speeches.
Conspiracy theory? Not so much…they have told us EXACTLY what they’re planning to do.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.