Feds stepping in to prosecute dozens of rioters in Portland – because the district attorney refuses to


PORTLAND, OR– Enough is enough.  The feds are stepping in to enforce law and order because Portland ‘leaders’ refuse to.

Earlier this week, the Multnomah County District Attorney announced that after almost three months of continuous rioting in Portland, dozens of people who were arrested during those demonstrations will not be prosecuted. 

It’s a good thing the federal government still believes in enforcing the law because as local officials give in and stand down to protesters, federal prosecutors are willingly taking on cases and charing individuals with the crimes they committed. 

According to reports, D.A. Mike Schmidt said that his office would not prosecute rioters that have been arrested unless the charges against them included property damage, theft, or force against another person.

Federal prosecutors are not waiting to charge Portland protesters and they are starting with a case against Edward Thomas Schinzing.

The Willamette reported that on May 29, 2020, which was the first night of civil unrest in Portland following the killing of George Floyd.

On that night, 30 people entered the Multnomah County Justice Center through smashed windows.

One of the protesters was a 5’8″ white man who prosecutors say set a fire to an office cubicle. He was shirtless and sporting a backward orange baseball cap. He also had a large tattoo inked across his upper back.

The loud tattoo read, “SCHINZING” in large letters, which authorities later came to find out was his last name.

Multiple video cameras inside of the building recorded Schinzing, 32 as he spread fire near the front of the office by lighting additional papers on fire and moving flaming papers into a drawer of a separate cubicle.

According to authorities, this was a done deal.

The actual destruction was caught on camera with the suspect easily identified thanks to the tattoo that showed his last name. In addition, county prosecutors are pursuing indictments for 47 people on felony charges related to protests this year.

On July 28th, Schinzing was indicted on arson charges, but instead of moving forward with the case, the county is not bringing the charges.  Instead, he is being prosecuted by the U.S. attorney for Oregon.

Schinzing has been in custody at the Multnomah County Jail since July 2nd. He was arrested for violating his parole after being convicted of assault this spring for attacking his domestic partner and her child.

Adding this violent and criminal history only makes the federal government’s case against him stronger.

The federal government is prosecuting his case now and according to Multnomah County Senior Deputy District Attorney Nathan Vasquez, this is the second case that has originated in the district attorney’s office that is now being taken up in federal court. 

Even though the fires were technically set in buildings owned by the city and county, the federal government is taking on the cases.

Their rationale? Because Portland and Multnomah County are recipients of federal aid, including COVID-19 relief funding, the federal government has the authority to prosecute crimes on those properties. 

At a press conference on August 11th, Schmidt announced a policy of only pursuing charges against protesters who deliberately destroyed property, used force against another person, or threatened to do so.

Schmidt claims that he is not familiar enough with the details of Schinzing’s case to say whether he supports the indictment or not.

During that press conference, Schmidt did not dispute the federal law enforcement’s authority to determine they had jurisdiction in the Schinzing case.

Former Multnomah County Chief Deputy District Attorney Norm Frink, who had a tough-on-crime reputation said that it would be typically odd for the federal government to prosecute someone for starting a small fire in a county building.

However, he also brought up numerous reasons as to how this entire situation over the last several months is in-and-of itself, unusual.  He said:

“Yeah, it’s unusual, but the circumstances are even more unusual. It’s unusual that for 70-plus days, people have been permitted, with minimal law enforcement interference to break the criminal laws over political animus. That’s highly unusual.”

He added:

“It’s unsurprising to me that the only adult left in the room would exercise federal jurisdiction when he can.” 

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Here is another article from Law Enforcement Today about how the district attorney’s office in Portland will not be prosecuting most protesters that were arrested during the riots:

PORTLAND, OR – After going on around 70-some-odd days of violent protests and riots in Portland, Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt decided the best move to do was to actually stop prosecuting certain crimes committed during these riots.

In a new policy announced on August 11th, DA Schmidt stated that in order to “promote a safe community” and “reduce the negative and lasting impacts” of an arrest record – people doing illegal things during the riots need to stop getting prosecuted.

According to the DA, the rationale for changing what does and does not get prosecuted is the following:

“If we leverage the full force of the criminal justice system on individuals who are peacefully protesting and demanding to be heard, we will cause irreparable harm to them individually and to our society.

“The prosecution of people exercising their rights to free speech and assembly in a non-violent manner takes away from the limited resources that we have to prosecute serious crimes and to assist crime victims.”

Well, lets examine what these “non-violent” charges would be that would no longer get prosecuted:

  • Interfering with a peace officer or parole and probation officer
  • Second-degree disorderly conduct
  • First and second-degree criminal trespass
  • Third-degree escape
  • Harassment
  • Riot (Unless accompanied by a charge outside of this list)

Oh, and in the event someone during a riot gets charged with resisting arrest, the DA’s office said they’ll take into consideration the “chaos of a protesting environment” when deciding whether to prosecute or not.

Now, let’s look at this first charge that DA Schmidt will no longer prosecute, that being interfering with a police officer as defined by Oregon state law. This means that someone can prevent police from fulfilling their lawful duties and not get into any trouble…like maybe creating a barricade not allowing officers to arrest a criminal.

Not only that, but this now creates a free pass for people to willingly disobey lawfully given orders. Because that also falls under ORS 162.247.

As for second-degree disorderly conduct, now people won’t get in legal trouble for blocking traffic, yelling “fire” in an apartment building, engages in “fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior,” and many other forms of disorderly conduct.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

And really? Criminal trespass in the first and second degree are now freebies too? That means when someone is lawfully told to leave a premises that they don’t own (say for instance, protesters invade your yard), no legal consequences will arise if they refuse to leave your property.

Harassment has to be one of the more absurd ones not going to be prosecuted either – because that means someone can subject “such other person to offensive physical contact,” or be allowed to berate someone in public and follow them around while doing so.

Rioting, which is a felony, will only get prosecuted if the alleged offender did something else illegal that wasn’t any of the aforementioned. Rioting is illegal for a reason, just like third-degree escape from police custody.

People have no been given the proverbial “okay” to riot in Portland and then escape from police custody and not get prosecuted.

But the madness doesn’t stop there.

So long as a rioter “only” commits a crime, whether felony or misdemeanor, during a protest that causes financial loss…they can have their cases dismissed if they pay restitution or abide by other outlines delineated by the DA’s office.

Here are the charges where people can have their criminal cases magically vanish if they abide by the court’s requests:

  • Second and third-degree criminal mischief – when the value is under $1,000
  • First, second and third-degree theft – when the value is under $1,000 or when the theft is committed during a riot
  • Second-degree burglary if combined with any criminal mischief or theft allegation

While the police department and the DA’s office said they won’t tolerate any violence toward police officers or other people in the community, they’re practically turning a blind eye to the menacing crowds that are terrorizing residents in Portland.

Pure, unadulterated madness.

It’s like he’s taking a page from the playbook of the San Francisco DA.  

In case you missed it… here’s that report from March:

SAN FRANCISCO, CA- San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who was raised by Weather Underground terrorists, is not endearing himself to members of the San Francisco Police Department.

Mere weeks after “suspending” prosecution for a man who was shot after assaulting a SFPD officer with a deadly weapon, Boudin has taken his politically correct BS to a whole other level.

On Friday, Boudin announced new policies that would be taking effect immediately within his office. And, they’re beauties.

Prosecutors will no longer charge people with possession of contraband based on so-called stop-and-frisk style pretextual searches, or use status-based sentencing enhancements, such as prior strikes, or alleged gang-affiliation status, except in extraordinary circumstances.

“Pretextual stops and sentencing enhancements based on who you know rather than what you did are relics of the tough-on-crime era that failed to make us safer,” Boudin said in a statement.

“Instead they led to mass incarceration, targeted innocent black and brown drivers, and increased recidivism. They stand in the way of fairness and justice,” he said.

“Today we take action. We send a message that is loud and clear to the police department and communities of color. We will no longer participate in, condone, tolerate or amplify racist police tactics,” he said.

What a pure, unadulterated clown.

A pretextual stop is when an officer pulls over for a traffic violation and during that stop, he/she develops reasonable suspicion or probable cause and conducts a search of either the vehicle and/or the occupants.

According to Boudin’s office, research shows that pretextual stops erode trust in communities of color and result in disproportionate arrests and higher convictions.


Citing a 2020 Racial Identity and Profiling Advisory Board Report, Boudin said that black drivers in San Francisco are stopped five times more often than white drivers.

The report also claims that drugs were only found in 1.3 percent of traffic stops, while firearms or ammunition were seized in just 0.6 percent of the stops.

Supervisor Shamann Walton thought Boudin’s decision was simply awesome.

“Pretextual stops, just like stop-and-frisk, overwhelmingly target communities of color. These policies, along with gang enhancements and other status enhancements, have contributed to abhorrent racial disparities in this city’s criminal justice system, resulted in excessive sentences, and have not made us any safer.

The constitutionality of these stops has always been in question and it is time to end them.”

The new reforms are supposedly designed to reduce racial disparities in the city’s criminal justice system. The implementation of these policies makes San Francisco the first city in the country to implement such policies, according to Boudin’s office.

However, the San Francisco Police Association blasted Boudin for the new “reforms.”

In a statement, SFPOA President Tony Montoya said:

“In his short tenure, Chesa Boudin has demonstrated that he is a clear and present danger to the law abiding residents, businesses and visitors of San Francisco.

Get pulled over and have an illegal handgun or AR-15? No problem, Boudin will throw out your case. Have 10 pounds of meth all in small plastic bags ready for sale?

No problem, Boudin will throw your case out too. It’s unconscionable that Boudin would let someone with an illegal gun go free, only to allow them the opportunity to arm themselves again.

Chesa Boudin is emboldening criminals and we are all going to pay a steep price for this absurd practice.”

Here is a little more on Boudin. 

If you ever wonder why things are out of control in San Francisco, look no further than what just happened in the city since Boudin was sworn in. 

As mentioned, last month the San Francisco District Attorney’s office decided to “withdraw the complaint” against a man who attacked two San Francisco police officers without provocation in December.

Communications Manager Paula Lehman-Ewing released the following statement on behalf of the District Attorney’s office:

“We decided to remove this case from the calendar at this time so that we may have a chance to evaluate all the facts.

The health of any criminal case depends on internal clarity around the charges being filed, which becomes more complicated when you are dealing with an instance where there is potentially competing criminal liability. However, the case and underlying charges have not been dismissed.”

Frankly, this sounds like a load of horse manure. And the president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association agrees.

“That’s just lawyer talk, technically they said they’re withdrawing the complaint if you read between the lines, that’s exactly what they’re doing, they’re dropping the charges,” said union president Tony Montoya.

“His charging decision to not charge Mr. Hampton for feloniously assaulting two of my members is not only cause of concern to all of my members but should be cause of concern to all abiding persons that come to San Francisco,” Montoya said.

Jamaica Hampton’s assault on the two SFPD officers was caught on video from both surveillance video in the neighborhood, as well as from the body-worn cameras of the two police officers.

Boudin, the newly elected social-justice warrior District Attorney told ABC-7 in San Francisco that there’s a difference between dismissing the case and withdrawing the complaint.

“The decision we made was one that frankly is in the best interest of the officers because they’re both being investigated right now by our internal investigation bureau into their use of firearms in the incident.

It would be improper and unfair to put them on the witness stand, to testify against Mr. Hampton while they’re being investigated for their use of force.

Until both investigations can be completed, we’re going to withhold making a final decision about who to charge with what,” Boudin said.

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and vets called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Click to check it out.

Feds moving to stop passengers from flying with pets as 'emotional support animals'


Gee Mr. Boudin sounds to us like you are fixing to charge the two police officers for protecting themselves from an unprovoked attack with a dangerous weapon.

Internal investigations by the DA’s office are standard protocol after an officer-involved shooting, which they are in a majority of jurisdictions. We don’t know that the DA’s office in those other jurisdictions “remove the case from the calendar” while the IA is pending.

The assailant in the case is currently still in the hospital, having lost one of his legs after the shooting and is said to remain in serious condition.

Montoya says that Boudin’s decision sends the wrong message.

“It’s smoke and mirrors. Mr. Hampton is a free man, so the minute he’s able to walk out of that hospital he can make the next person he runs into the victim like he did Saturday morning December 7th.

The chief of the San Francisco Police Department sent the following message to his officers:

Members of San Francisco’s Finest,

I want to provide you with an update regarding last month’s attack on two of our Mission Station officers in which an officer involved shooting occurred. The District Attorney has informed me that at this time he will withdraw charges against the suspect. The DA indicated that his withdrawal is not a dismissal of the case.

This unprovoked attack was a violent, criminal act. I want you to know that we remain committed to working with the DA to see that justice is done in this case for our officers.

Be Safe out there!

Bill Scott.

In case you’re not familiar with Boudin, let’s introduce you. He was the son of Weather Underground radicals. If you’re not familiar with the Weather Underground, they were a left-wing terrorist organization that was active in the late 60’s and early 70’s. They were responsible for a series of bombings, jailbreaks and riots.

Among their “greatest hits” was the bombing of the U.S. State Department in Washington, DC in January 1975. Just hours later, another bomb was found at a military induction center in Oakland, California. The Weather Underground claimed responsibility for both incidents.

By the next year, the group had claimed responsibility for 25 bombings, which included the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, the California Attorney General’s office, and a police station in New York City.

So now, we have the son of radicals running the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. What could possibly go wrong?

When Boudin was running for election, he used his experiences to “remind voters that more than half of Americans have a family member behind bars.” He also claimed that he was “running for district attorney because I know how to fix it.

Yes, apparently by releasing criminals that assault police officers. Also, not for nothing Boudin, your 50% of Americans with family members in jail number seems a bit skewed, just saying.  

He also signed on to the Andrew Cuomo “get out of jail free” approach to criminal justice reform. He recently announced that his office was eliminating cash bail as a condition for the pretrial release of defendants from jail.

“For years I’ve been fighting to end this discriminatory and unsafe approach to pretrial detention,” Boudin said. “From this point forward, pretrial detention will be based on public safety, not on wealth.”

That’s working out well in New York, as we’ve reported ad nauseum.  

The shooting on Dec. 7 occurred after Hampton attacked officers with a glass bottle. In video, he can be seen running up to a marked police cruiser after the officer on the passenger side opened the door to speak with him.

KPIX-TV said that police had responded to the area after police received a so-called “hot prowl burglary” in which an adult male forced open an apartment door on the 900 block of Capp Street.

Police arrived approximately five minutes after, however the suspect had fled on foot. As police were investigating that call, a second call came in about a male trying to break into cars. Officers began to search the area and came across Hampton, who matched the physical and clothing descriptions of the suspect.

When officers attempted to contact him, Hampton “aggressively advanced” toward the police cruiser, with a 200ml glass vodka bottle and started attacking the officer on the passenger side.

The driver of the cruiser got out, and went to go to his partner’s aid, when Hampton repeatedly struck him with the bottle in the head and face. The officer received lacerations to his cheek and head and was knocked down after trying to use his impact weapon.

Hampton then chased the injured officer, and which time the second officer drew his sidearm. Both officers had their weapons drawn and gave Hampton verbal commands, but he turned and ran.

Officers then attempted to use pepper spray on Hampton with no success. With the glass bottle still in his hands, he charged at the two police officers. One of them fired at Hampton as he came closer.

Hampton, even after being shot, got back up and started moving toward the other officer, who also discharged his weapon at him. Hampton finally was taken down.

Both officers remained on scene and administered aid to Hampton until the arrival of medical personnel. The injured officer and Hampton were transported to the hospital for treatment.

Only one of the body-worn camera’s footage was released because the second officer’s camera was knocked off in the scuffle with Hampton.

As a result of the shooting, Hampton received life-threatening injuries after being struck three times. He was charged with two counts of assault with a deadly weapon and vandalism by the District Attorney’s Office. Those are the charges that were “dropped” this past week.

Of course, after the shooting, the outrage mob was out in full force, minus Al Sharpton. Friends, family members and Mission District activists were “outraged” by the shooting, saying that Hampton battled addiction and homelessness and was a mentor for at-risk youth. Yup, just the kind of person you want to “mentor at risk youth.”

 Had the two officers been psychics and known that Hampton was such a great guy when he wasn’t assaulting cops with vodka bottles, perhaps this whole episode could have been avoided.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First



Submit a Correction
Related Posts