Washington D.C.: The two FBI agents who were reportedly involved with social media companies’ decisions to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story were also donors to the Democratic party, according to Federal Election Commission website.
In recent years, there has been growing concern among political parties, most notably Republicans, regarding any political bias from federal agencies infiltrating the election process and politics in general.
Well now its been proven that two FBI’s agents with influence in Big Tech have political bias- Laura Dehmlow and Elvis Chan.
They are each in very influential positions. Demhlow is the unit chief for Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), ironically.
And Chan is the head of FBI’s San Francisco Cyber Division.
Mark Zuckerberg, the head of Meta- the parent company for Facebook, appeared as a guest on the Joe Rogan podcast over the summer and made some stunning comments about the FBI, the 2020 elections, and the Hunter Biden laptop story.
According to a column in the Epoch Times, it stated:
“Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, the parent company of Facebook, told Joe Rogan in late August that the company actively reduced the reach of social media posts about the laptop of Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election, adding that the move was in response to a general advisory from the FBI for Facebook staffers to be vigilant for Russian propaganda before the election.”
After a review of campaign records found on the official election commission website, it confirmed both agents contributed to Democratic campaigns. The have together contributed over $100 towards Democratic campaigns, including Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock prior to the 2020 November elections.
Although the amounts are not staggering, it further confirms the suspicions from many political entities feared- that political bias exists in the federal agency. Worse yet, both agents are staffed in positions to act on these biases to affect their personal beliefs.
According to the Epoch Times column, it stated:
“News of the FBI agents’ donations to the Democrats comes amid longstanding concerns of political bias in the domestic security service. GOP lawmakers have previously alleged that the FBI shut down an investigation into alleged crimes by Hunter Biden over allegations of disinformation by Democrat lawmakers.”
The Lawsuit Against Big Tech
The Attorney Generals for Missouri and Louisiana, Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry, respectively, have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration.
They allege that officials from the Biden administration management team, such as Press Secretary Jenn Psaki, Medical Advisor Anthony Fauci, and President Biden himself were very closely and overly involved in the restrictions of many social media users from major platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
The lawsuit alleges they had direct and indirect involvement and colluded with the social media giants to filter what distributed, controlled, or generally misinformed and disinformed users.
Among the Big Tech content mentioned in the lawsuit was the highly debated and controversial Hunter Laptop story. Other related allegations state that Twitter restricted Covid related content that challenged then Fauci rhetoric and froze the account of New York Post after they published an article regarding the contents of Hunter’s laptop.
The New York Times and Washington post later corroborated the story.
Chan and Dehmlow’s Role
The lawsuit goes on to discuss Chan’s role in the process, as he is well situated geographically.
According to the Epoch Times, it stated:
“The complaint also notes that major social media companies are ‘headquartered in the geographical area of FBI’s San Francisco Division, and Elvis Chan is in charge of cyber related issues for that division.’ As such, Chan ‘has performed a critical role in communicating with social media platforms on behalf of the FBI relating to censorship and suppression of speech on social media,’ the complaint reads.”
The complaint was amended from its original form to include concerning issues with Dehmlow. In one of her presentations to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, her department within the FBI discussed troubling concerns.
In the column, it stated:
“…she ‘indicated that the FBI’s FITF ‘engages … with appropriate partners for information exchange.’ The complaint states that, ‘On information and belief, this ‘information exchange’ includes communications with social-media platforms about censorship and/or censorship and/or suppression of social-media speech.’”
Although the donation contributions aren’t earth-shattering amounts, they still indicate a troubling, serious national issue.
Federal agents are proving they have political preferences. And Chan and Dehmlow are in a perfect position to pursue there bias to interfere with one of America’s most precious democratic processes- elections.
If justice is to be served, it will start will this historic lawsuit.
U.S. District judge grants discovery phase in collusion suit against Biden and social media companies
July 14th, 2022
WASHINGTON, D.C. – According to reports, a judge has granted a discovery in the social media collusion lawsuit against Biden and his administration.
Judge Orders Discovery To Proceed In Social Media Collusion Lawsuit Against Biden Administration https://t.co/ws9fc9QhrM
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) July 14, 2022
Now, Biden along with members of his administration and select social media companies have to turn over documents and answer questions within the next 30 days during the discovery phase of a lawsuit that alleges collusion to suppress freedom of speech.
The attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri filed the suit in May, alleging that Biden and eight high-ranking members of his administration as well as the government colluded with and/or coerced social media companies including Meta, Twitter and YouTube to suppress “disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content on social media platforms.”
On Tuesday, July 12th, U.S. District Court Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, Terry Doughty ruled there is “good cause” for the discovery process.
The judge set a timetable for the discovery phase, including specific deadlines for depositions.
In a statement, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt (R), a candidate for the seat of retiring U.S. Senator Roy Blunt, said:
“In May, Missouri and Louisiana filed a landmark lawsuit against top-ranking Biden administration officials for allegedly colluding with social media giants to suppress freedom of speech on a number of topics including the origins of COVID-19, the efficacy of masks, and election integrity.”
https://twitter.com/Adam_2025/status/1547655977511424003
The statement added:
“Today, the Court granted our motion for discovery, paving the way for my office to gather important documents to get to the bottom of that alleged collusion. This is a huge development.”
The four-count lawsuit alleges that the social media companies labeled content “disinformation” and “misinformation.”
The suit also contends the suppression constitutes government action and violates freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.
In addition, the suit alleges that the federal government’s actions exceeded statutory authority and the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
Both AGs allege that a “Disinformation Governance Board” within DHS pressured social media companies to suppress free speech on the following topics:
The Hunter Biden laptop story prior to the 2020 presidential election;
Speech about the lab-leak theory of COVID-19’s origin;
Speech about the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns; and
Speech about election integrity and the security of voting by mai.
After the AGs filed a motion for an expedited preliminary injunction-related discovery, the Biden administration filed an opposition.
The administration argued that Louisiana and Missouri did not have the authority to bring a paren patria suit against the federal government.
The administration contended that there was not a link between alleged injuries to the states and the government’s alleged actions and argued the states can’t demonstrate how the court will provide justice for an alleged “injury in fact.”
BREAKING NEWS: Biden, White House & Social Media Companies in the Hot Seat Legally!
Judge Orders Discovery Phase in Social Media Collusion Lawsuit Against Biden Administration – https://t.co/Uja0wqgNdt
— Old Man With A Pen (@ConservativeAd5) July 14, 2022
The Biden administration argues that the two states cannot meet an “injury in fact” standard, which is defined as “it suffered ‘an invasion of a legally protected interest’ that is ‘concrete,’ ‘particularized,’ ‘and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.'”
Judge Doughty (R), was nominated by former President Donald Trump and confirmed by a 98-0 vote in the Senate. In his ruling, he wrote that the states met the administration’s contentions.
Hunter Biden is a hot topic these days.
Judicial Watch sues Secret Service for records related to Hunter Biden’s purchase, disposal of firearm
Posted September 26, 2022
The following contains embedded content which is editorial in nature and which expresses the opinion of the author.
—
WASHINGTON, DC- The decision of the Biden administration and federal agencies to give cover to crackhead criminal Hunter Biden now threatens to take down at least one government agency which has been covering up for his criminal actions…possibly more.
According to a release from Judicial Watch, they have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security seeking records related to the “investigation” (if any such investigation in fact occurred) of Hunter Biden’s gun, illegally obtained and illegally disposed of in Delaware dumpster on or about October 2018.
On March 25, 2021, Judicial Watch made a request of the Secret Service, a subsidiary of the DHS for records or communications about the reported purchase and subsequent disposal of a firearm owned by Hunter Biden in 2018. The Secret Service ignored the request, leading to the lawsuit.
As Judicial Watch noted in their release, they are seeking for themselves, as well as on behalf of interested American citizens whether and/or how the Secret Service intervened in the incident.
In October 2020, The Blaze reported that in October 2018, Hallie Biden, the widow of Hunter Biden’s brother Beau and his then-girlfriend, took Hunter Biden’s handgun from Hunter. As reported by Politico:
Hallie took Hunter’s gun and threw it in a trash can behind a grocery store, only to return later to find it gone.
Delaware police began investigating, concerned that the trash can was across from a high school and that the missing gun could be used in a crime, according to law enforcement officials and a copy of the police report obtained by Politico.
But a curious thing happened at the time: Secret Service agents approached the owner of the store where Hunter bought the gun and asked to take the paperwork involving the sale, according to two people, one of whom has firsthand knowledge of the episode and the other was briefed by a Secret Service agent after the fact.
Recall again that this took place in 2018, when Joe Biden was no longer vice president. As such, Hunter Biden was not entitled to Secret Service protection.
Why then would the Secret Service have any interest in ostensibly seizing the paperwork involving Hunter Biden’s clearly illegal purchase of a firearm? Inquiring minds (and Judicial Watch) want to know.
Judicial Watch asserts that the Biden administration and the Secret Service are attempting to cover for Hunter Biden’s illegal firearm purchase.
As an admitted user of narcotics, Hunter Biden is banned from purchasing or owning a firearm. In fact, he would have had to lie on the federal firearms form in order to purchase the gun, a felony.
Judicial Watch writes that this is just another in a long line of roadblocks being put up by the Biden administration and its law enforcement apparatus to protect Hunter Biden from inquiries into matters such as his abandoned laptop, his questionable business connections and travel related to same, including about Air Force Two when Biden served as vice president. Now the careless disposal of a firearm in a dumpster adjacent to a high school.
The organization notes that the organization is looking into other lines of inquiry involving Hunter Biden.
For example, Judicial Watch, through FOIA requests, have been able to unmask significant information about Hunter Biden’s connections in Ukraine, such as his well known appointment to the board of directors for sleazy Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.
For example in 2020, Judicial Watch received records from the State Department which tied Burisma Holdings into a lobbying operation regarding an influence-peddling operation which involved the Clinton campaign during the 2016 presidential election campaign.
Moreover, they discovered that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch specifically warned back in 2017 about corruption allegations against Burisma.
Earlier in 2020, Judicial Watch obtained State Department records, including a briefing checklist outlining a February 2019 meeting in Kyiv between Yovanovitch and Sally Painter, co-founder and COO of Blue Star Strategies, a Democratic lobbying firm hired by Burisma to contest corruption allegations.
That checklist also showed that Painter planned to meet with Foreign Commercial Service (FCS) Officer Martin Claessens “regarding the Burisma Group energy company.” (Painter was implicated in the Clinton-era fundraising scandal Judicial Watch exposed involving the sale of seats on Commerce Department trade missions to Democratic National Committee donors.)
In September 2020, Judicial Watch received records from the State Department which included a January 18, 2017 email from George Kent, Obama’s deputy assistant secretary of state in charge of Ukraine policy, which was copied to then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Yovanovitch which highlighted Russia-linked media “trolling” Joe Biden “over his son’s business.”
Judicial Watch then highlights an email sent four days prior to the inauguration of Donald Trump to a redacted recipient and copied to Yovanovitch, with the subject line “medvedchuk-linked vesti trolls Biden.” Kent wrote: “Burisma—gift that keeps on giving (With medvedchuk affiliated Vesti pushing the troll like storyline on visit day)”
For the first five and one-half years of the Obama administration, Secret Service records showed that Hunter Biden traveled extensively, all the while receiving a Secret Service detail. During the time period reviewed, Hunter Biden too 411 separate domestic and international flights, including to 29 different countries, with five visits made to China.
Judicial Watch also points out they are suing the Department of Homeland Security on Hunter Biden’s travel and security costs, while also suing the State Department for messages sent though the SMART (State Messaging and Archive Retrieval Toolkit) system that mention Hunter Biden.
