Grandma, 80, banned from YMCA after complaining about male stripping little girls in women’s locker room


The following includes editorial content which is the opinion of the writer.

PORT TOWNSEND, WA- The insanity continues, this time in Port Townsend, Washington, where an 80-year-old woman has been banned from using the public pool at her local YMCA after she questioned why a biological male was allowed in the women’s locker room while young girls were undressing. In other words, a pedophile’s wet dream.

The woman, Julie Jaman, was in the shower when she looked out and saw a clearly confused biological male wearing a women’s swimsuit speaking with little girls who were in the process of undressing, according to the Post Millennial.

The male was apparently “overseeing” the activities of the young girls who were at the “Y” as part of a day camp.

Last Monday, Jaman, a resident of the city for about 40 years, addressed the city council while describing the bizarre situation she encountered at the Mountain View Pool after her regular swim.

“In an effort by the city and the YMCA to apply the neo-cultural gender rules at Mountain View Pool dressing, shower room facilities, women and children are being put at risk,” she said.

She described the incident as follows: She was showering after her regular swim on July 26 at the pool, when she heard “a man’s voice in the women’s dressing area.”

She then related that she saw “a man in a women’s swimsuit, watching little girls pull down their bathing suits in order to use the toilets in the dressing room.”

Sounds a little creepy to us…just saying.

The Post Millennial reached out to the YMCA and received a reply from the Marketing and Communications Manager, who tried to brush off the incident, claiming the staff member was not “engaging” with the girls, but rather escorting them to the dressing room. That differs from the witness’s account, that he was inside the dressing room watching little girls pull down their bathing suits.

The Port Townsend Free Press reported the issue and said Jaman, who was in the shower when she realized the bizarre scene taking place, was hidden behind thin, sheer shower curtains and asked the man, who identified himself as Clementine Adams, “Do you have a penis?”

“None of your business,” the flustered Adams replied, at which time Jaman told him go “get out of here, right now.”

At this point, YMCA aquatics manager Rowen DeLuna told Jaman that she had to leave the room, according to the Free Press, while admonishing her.

“You’re discriminating and you can’t  use the pool anymore and I’m calling the police,” DeLuna said.

Perhaps the spelling is supposed to be “De Loon a.”

The Marketing and Communications Manager told the Post Millennial that Jaman was not being permanently banned solely for this incident, but instead due to “repeatedly violating the Olympic Peninsula YMCA code of conduct, specifically using disrespectful words or gestures towards YMCA staff or others; and abusive, harassing, and/or obscene language or gestured towards YMCA staff or others.”

Remarkable timing. The manager said that there had been past issues, but the latest one where she admonished a man in the girl’s bathroom was simply too much to bear, calling it “unforgivable and extremely harmful.”

While Jaman was walking out of the building, DeLuna told her that she wasn’t abiding by the YMCA’s principles and values, whatever those are.

For some unknown reason, another YMCA staffer attempted to block the elderly woman from leaving the building, at which point she said, “Bullshit! I’m going to the police right now. I want help and I need it immediately.”

Jamal went next door to the police department, and later received a call back from Port Townsend police officer Marc Titterness.

The Free Press obtained a transcript of the report, in which Titterness reported Jaman “had an emotional response to a strange male being in the bathroom and helping a young girl take off her bathing suit.”

In the old days, that would have been called “risk of injury to a minor” or something along those lines. Not in the woke days of 2022, however.

The call transcript also contained a phone call record from an anonymous person at the YMCA, who reported that “Clementine was in the bathroom with a child in the day camp and Julie asked if [she] had a penis and started screaming at [her] to get out.”

In yet another call, someone reported that Jaman “had been asked to leave and is refusing.”

And another call claimed she was “screaming at employee and calling names and refusing to leave.”

Jaman said she spoke to Wendy Bart, CEO of the Olympic Peninsula YMCA who (of course) stood by the actions of her employees.

According to Bart, a staff member claimed Jaman said to Adams, “You’re going to stick your fucking penis in those little girls.”

Jaman, however, denies saying this, telling “The Distance” on Substack, “I am an 80-year-old woman and I do not talk like that.”

In her appearance before the city council, Jaman said there is no signage letting women know they should expect gender confused men to enter the women’s shower room.

“There is no signage informing women the shower room is now all gender and what that means, nor have parents been informed of what they can expect with these new policies,” she said.

Wokington, er Washington state law reads:

“All covered entities shall allow individuals the use of gender-segregated facilities, such as restrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, and homeless or emergency shelters, that are consistent with that individual’s gender expression or gender identity.”

Jaman claims the Y does not provide such segregation.

“The Y has not provided any dressing, shower room options for women who do not want to be exposed to men who identify as women,” Jaman added.

The YMCA manager disputes that however, telling the Post Millennial that there are private stalls within the changing rooms that close and lock or individuals who seek additional privacy and not be forced to co-mingle with gender confused individuals. Ok, those are our words, not the managers…but you get the point.

Jaman continued, slamming the YMCA’s staff on how to deal with such a situation where someone isn’t down with the revolution regarding anything goes with gender:

“The staff seems to have received little professional training on how to handle reactions to such a radical cultural change, particularly for the most vulnerable, older female patrons and children who may be exposed to inappropriate behavior. The dignity and safety of unsuspecting women who have trusted to use these facilities for many years. This is not right.”

Since being banned from the YMCA, Jamal and some of her supporters have been protesting outside the pool, claiming the facility had promised to add all-gender bathrooms but instead “took over the traditional binary areas.”

In a press release from the YMCA, it read:

“The Y will uphold and respect this law in regards to YMCA staff, members, and program participants that use Mountain View Pool. At the Y, our goal is to provide an atmosphere free from discrimination, hatred, derogatory or unwelcome comments, intimidation, or actions based on an individual’s sex, age, race, ethnicity, religion, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression or any other legally protected status.”

They forgot to mention they provide an atmosphere where pedophiles and groomers are free to practice their craft.

For more on how totally unhinged the left has become, we invite you to read a prior piece we published:


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Ketanji Brown Jackson opposed an expert witness’s explanation of pedophilia during a sentencing commission hearing.

In February 2012, during a hearing of the sentencing commission, in which Jackson served in the role of Vice-Chair, she contested the definition of pedophilia.

Experts in their fields provided information on their knowledge for the commission.

Digital forensic investigator Gerald Grant, U.S. Department of Justice criminal child exploitation professional James Fottrell and Dr. Gene Abel, a psychiatrist who works with an organization to identify pedophiles, were present.

According to the transcript, Jackson asks,

“And so I’m wondering whether you could say that there is a — that there could be a less-serious child pornography offender who is engaging in the type of conduct in the group experience level because their motivation is the challenge, or to use the technology? 

They’re very sophisticated technologically, but they aren’t necessarily that interested in the child pornography piece of it? “

James Fottrell responded with,

“I think it’s difficult to say that the singular-experience are not dangerous.  

There are certainly examples of that.

If somebody is using a peer-to-peer network and they are searching  23 for “one-year-old,” or they’re searching for a very sadistic content, that would certainly make them serious.”

Jackson followed up with

“I had mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles. 

So I’m trying to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography. 

And are those the people who you are saying are the nonsexually motivated offenders?”




Senator Hawley took to Twitter to express his frustration with Jackson’s leniency with sex offenders.

He tweeted,

“I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches.

I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

He noted,

“Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker.

She’s been advocating for it since law school.

This goes beyond “soft on crime.”

I’m concerned that this a record that endangers our children.”


During Jackson’s recent confirmation hearings, she explained to Senator Graham how the internet is a problem for pedophiles and that just merely clicking for a few minutes could mean lengthy time in jail.

In the video clip, Senator Graham is heard saying he hopes offenders do go to jail.

Her critics argue that she is “soft on crime” and too lenient with the sentencing of pedophiles, terrorists, and drug dealers.


Senator Hawley Tweeted,

“This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land.

Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn’t be up for debate.

Sending child predators to jail shouldn’t be controversial.”

Jackson has relaxed sentencing for prisoners sentenced for attacking law enforcement.

In 2015, Jackson sentenced David Jenkins only 18 months after he was convicted for the third time for the assault on a police officer. The officer was attempting to arrest Jenkins on a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon.

The request was for 30 months in lock-up. However, after much pleading by his lawyer, Jackson ruled for 18 months.

Yet, during her confirmation hearings, she referred to her brother, who serves in law enforcement, saying,

“I understand the need for law enforcement, the importance of having people who are willing to do that important work, the importance of holding people accountable for their criminal behavior.

I also as a lawyer and a citizen, believe very strongly in our Constitution, and the rights that make us free.”


Senator Hawley expressed his strong concern for the lack of transparency in another Tweet, saying,

“So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson’s records from her time there.

In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records.”


Deep state corruption? “Nonpartisan” FBI field office planned celebration party for Ketanji Brown Jackson

The following contains editorial content which is the opinion of the author, a contributing writer to Law Enforcement Today.

LOS ANGELES, CA- And here we thought law enforcement agencies, especially those on the federal level were supposed to be “non-partisan.”

Of course, that ship sailed in 2016 when the FBI collaborated with the Clinton campaign to perpetrate the Russia collusion hoax via the Crossfire Hurricane scam investigation. Now we’re finding that partisanship is alive and well and still living within the FBI.

According to leaked emails, the Los Angeles field office of the FBI advertised a “nomination party” for far-left radical Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson shortly after Biden nominated her, according to National File, citing an initial report by the Washington Free Beacon.

The Free Beacon received an internally-circulated email sent by the FBI’s Los Angeles Women’s and Black Affairs Committees dated March 11.

The email advertised a “save the date” for an interview with the agency’s assistant director in charge of the LA field office, as well as a “nomination party” for Jackson scheduled for March 23. Fox News’ Tucker Carlson reported on the event last week.

“Join us: A dynamic interview, socialization, and lots of celebrating with desserts!” read a leaked invitation to the event, which was scrapped a day later after word got out.

That cancellation was confirmed in an email from the office’s diversity and inclusion department, and was done when FBI leadership concluded that the party would violate the bureau’s “commitment to nonpartisanship.” (insert laugh emoji here)

“The FBI must remain neutral in all political confirmation and nomination processes,” stated the email canceling the event. “Accordingly, a party for any nominee in FBI space would be inappropriate.”

The unnamed employee then apologized for any “misunderstanding.”

The Free Beacon reported they were told by an FBI spokeswoman that the reported party to celebrate Jackson’s nomination was “addressed immediately and does not reflect the high standards of the FBI.”

“An email circulated within the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office recognizing a Supreme Court nomination was issued without proper review and was quickly retracted by FBI management,” the spokeswoman wrote in a statement.

As the Free Beacon noted, the event planned to celebrate Jackson’s nomination once again raises questions about the politicization of the FBI and calls into question whether the agency is, in fact, nonpartisan.

The latest episode appears to confirm concerns Republican lawmakers have had about the agency, especially in light of the 2016 circus involving Crossfire Hurricane.

For example in 2018, the DOJ’s inspector general wrote that he “did not have confidence” that former FBI agent Peter Strzok had acted “free from bias” when he allegedly investigated Hillary Clinton’s private email servicer, or the investigations conducted of Trump.

In his report, the IG wrote that “the public’s trust is negatively impacted when law enforcement officials make statements reflecting bias.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
Facebook Follow First
Submit a Correction
Related Posts