We know she did it for the television cameras… but some say ripping up the papers might be a much bigger issue. Check this out.


It’s been widely reported that at the end of President Trump’s State of the Union speech on February 4th, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ripped up a copy of the president’s address. However, aside from the act being viewed as “aggressively rude” by CNN’s Brian Stetler, was the House Speaker’s actions during the address an illegal move?

According to 18 U.S.C. §  1361, that may very well be the case.

While closing the State of the Union speech, President Trump was delivering a warm sendoff to those in attendance. He closed things out with the following sentiments:

“And my fellow Americans, the best is yet to come. Thank you, God bless you and God bless America.”

Video of the president’s closing statements circulated online in a near-instant viral fashion, but not because of what the president stated. Instead, if was the actions of Speaker Pelosi that fueled the online conversation starter, when she ripped up a copy of the president’s address right on camera.

Did Nancy Pelosi break the law when she tore up Trump's speech?

Nancy Pelosi was seen ripping up President Trump’s State of the Union address. (Screenshot – YouTube)


You can see Pelosi collect the documents containing the president’s speech, and tear them in half. Of course, it’s not surprising to see that Pelosi’s actions gained the support of Squad member Rashida Tlaib.


Then again, what more would one expect from Tlaib since she’s the same person who had to be escorted out of Trump speech delivered at the Detroit Economic Club in August 2016.


The million-dollar question is whether what Pelosi did was actually illegal at the State of the Union address or simply just childish. The legality of Pelosi’s actions would be highly contingent upon whether a copy of the president’s speech is considered a “public record or document”.

In a logical sense, it certainly seems to be the case.  

Public records, by definition, are documents or pieces of information that are not considered confidential and generally pertain to the conduct of government.

Furthermore, a State of the Union address pertains specifically to government endeavors and accomplishments. So, for arguments sake, we’ll observe that a copy Trump’s speech falls under that legal definition of a “public record or document”.


According to the United States Department of Justice Archives, through their listings within the Criminal Resource Manual, laws regarding the theft or destruction of public records state the following:

“The taking of a public record or document is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 641. The destruction of such records may be reached under 18 U.S.C. §  1361. In both instances, however, proving a $100 loss, the prerequisite to a felony conviction, may be difficult. Thus, neither of these statutes adequately protects government records.”

According to the language listed, the mere act of destroying these kinds of documents are criminal, but determining if they’re a misdemeanor or felony gets a little dicey. Take for example someone tearing up a copy of a marriage certificate, which is often public record. One could easily determine the value of a legal marriage certificate since someone paid for a copy of it, which that act likely wouldn’t be felonious since they typically run $20 for a copy.

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and veterans called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Click to check it out.

San Francisco's new DA fires seven senior prosecutors in two days because they enforced laws


So, how does one determine the value of a copy of Trump’s State of the Union address that was afforded to Pelosi? It can depend on a number of things, such as would the mere stationary’s value be considered since they were never “sold” to attendees. Or, would the document’s value be contingent upon what the free market would be willing to pay for that copy Pelosi tore up. If the worth would be attributed by the “fair market value”, then whether or not the document was personally signed by Trump could certainly create a discussion of if it’s valued over $100 or not.

For instance, mere photographs of President Trump that bear his authentic signature go for nearly $500 online.  Another thing to consider in this matter is whether Speaker Pelosi intentionally destroyed the speech in her hand that evening. It’s fairly obvious she did, since she proceeded to tear portions of the speech separately, establishing intent in front of news cameras around. The law’s components of both intent of the act and also knowledge that they’re public record were outlined in the United States v. Simpson and the United States v. DeGroat.

With all things considered, assuming the copy of the speech is valued at over $100, then Speaker Pelosi could face up to three years in prison and a $2,000 fine. Now if she were to ever actually be prosecuted is a completely different speculation altogether. Whether or not legal filings result down the road, the White House wasn’t exactly pleased with the juvenile displayed according to their Twitter account.


In all honesty, we’re not at all entertained by the display either. However, perhaps a shredding of the articles of impeachment against President Trump would make for a clever retort.


Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First