Democrats: Mail-in voting is safe. Democrat-run NJ: We’re gonna need to redo this election because of these guys.

Share:

TRENTON, NJ –Democratic New Jersey Governor, Phil Murphy, recently announced that every person in the State of New Jersey will receive a mail-in ballot. 

This move was done because he felt that the primary election, which was run by the same model, “was a success.” 

If the governor meant that the primary election done through mail-in balloting was ripe with fraud and illegal actions was a success, he would be right.

LET reported in June the incident which led up to State Superior Court Judge Ernest Caposela to shoot down the election results of the primary election in Paterson, New Jersey. 

With this election, current Paterson Councilman Michael Jackson and Councilman-Elect Alex Mendez are alleged to have committing voting fraud.

State Attorney General: City council vice president, three others charged with voting fraud in May special election

The criminal investigation into the matter started when the United States Postal Inspection Service noted that hundreds of mail-in ballots were in the same mailbox. 

This was odd because if people mailed their ballots normally, a large amount of them would not typically end up in the same location at the same time.

Authorities began an investigation which ultimately led them to four different people being involved. 

Jackson, Mendez, Shahin Khalique, and Abu Razyen were alleged to have participated in a scheme which they conducted ballot harvesting which is illegal under New Jersey law.

Some people believe that the group collected these ballots, or in some cases, stole them out of mailboxes, and ensured they got the votes they wanted.  All four were arrested in the scheme.

For Councilman-Elect Mendez, he was charged with second-degree election fraud as well as five other criminal violations. 

The main allegation is that Mendez had custody of voter applications that he knew or should have known were “false, fictitious, or fraudulent, in that he knew the person for whom the application was procured was not eligible to vote in the election district identified on the application.” 

After the fraud was discovered, election officials threw out 800 ballots that were deemed to be tainted over this scheme.  Although all involved maintain their innocence, an injunction was secured which prevented Mendez from being sworn into office. 

This contested election was eventually brought to Caposela’s courtroom to be heard.  On August 19th, he ruled that the election was invalid due to the alleged fraud.  Caposela has ruled that the new election will be held in November.

Despite this ruling and evidence of fraud, Murphy still believes that mail-in voting is the best option for the state. 

President Donald Trump and most republican leaders are against mail-in voting because of the fraud that could occur as a result.  This case certainly serves as an example of how the republican leaders are correct.

However, Murphy feels differently and actually views this as an example of how fraud was detected and stopped.  He said:

“Some guys tried to screw with the system, they got caught.  They’ve been indicted.  And you’re innocent until proven guilty, but if they’re convicted, they’ll pay a big price for that.” 

What Murphy fails to acknowledge as the key phrase he gave in his response to this fraud, “they got caught.” 

In other words, had they been smarter in their scheme, like not putting hundreds of ballots in one mailbox, they may have gotten away with the crime.  Makes one wonder how many examples are out there of voter fraud in which the criminals were never caught.

Murphy assures the public that election officials are prepared for the general election in November.  He then said:

“He [President Trump] feels very passionately.  We believe the facts, particularly based on the primary we successfully had – the second highest turnout ever -that we’ve got the actual track record.” 

Again, Murphy’s definition of success must be drastically different from most peoples, after all, having part of an election thrown out over fraud is far from a success.

Then of course you have Lansing, Michigan.

For months, Democrat leaders have been making the push toward voting by mail and ballot harvesting. 

LET has reported several times in the last couple months on problems with it all throughout the country which certainly shows that both mail in voting and ballot harvesting are ripe with potential fraud and issues. 

In a recent report out of Michigan, there seem to be at least more concerns regarding voting by mail.

Recently, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office released information regarding the rejection of several thousand absentee ballots.  Out of the 10,600 absentee ballots that were rejected on August 4th, 6,400 were refused because they had arrived after election day.

2,225 ballots were also not counted because there were no signatures present on the envelope.  Another 1,111 were discounted because the voter had moved after their vote was cast.  And, amazingly, 846 were refused because the voter was deceased.

Benson’s office claims the 846 deceased voters had died after their vote was cast.  They were able to stop the votes from coming through because they get monthly updates from the Social Security Administration.  Thus, stating that there was no mail fraud on the deceased votes and their system worked.

The Detroit News reports that the number of mail in votes by deceased people has decreased, so far, from the November 2016 election.  According to them, 1,782 votes were received by election officials from people who had died after their vote had been cast.

Problems with the design and timelines of mail in voting in the state of Michigan is not new. 

United States Postal Service General Counsel Thomas Marshall informed Benson previously that the delivery timelines provided posed a “significant risk” to ballots being sent to close to election day.  As noted previously, votes that are received after election day are null and void.

In a letter to Benson, Marshall said:

“This mismatch [in delivery schedule] creates a risk that ballots requested near the deadline under state law will not be returned by mail in time to be counted under your laws as we understand them.” 

Marshall advised that the postal service already prioritizes sending of ballots through the mail.  However, even with that priority in place, he calls on voters to mail their ballots in at least 15 days ahead of election day to ensure the ballot makes it in time.   

Currently, Michigan election law allows voters to apply for a mail in ballot up to election day, leaving no time for the vote to make its way back to the election office.  It also allows for ballots to be mailed to voters up to 4 days before the election.  A time frame that Marshall advised is impossible to ensure. 

In his letter, Marshall said:

“If a requested ballot is transmitted to the voter by mail at or near that 4-day deadline, there is a significant risk that the ballot will not reach the voter before Election Day, and accordingly that the voter will not be able to use the ballot to cast his or her vote.” 

Benson’s office said the release of this information in hope that state leaders will work to pass legislation to help speed up the process and give her office the ability to notify voters for issues when the voter has not signed the ballot.

Benson said:

“The data demonstrates that thousands of people who cast otherwise valid votes were not able to participate in last week’s election solely because the Legislature failed to act ahead of the primary.

With turnout and absentee ballot numbers expected to double or even triple in November, we could be looking at tens of thousands of Michigan citizens disenfranchised if the legislature again fails to act.”   

Currently, 2.4 million Michigan voters have signed up to conduct absentee ballots in the upcoming presidential election.  Benson advised that her office will be sending mailers out to the remaining 4.4 million registered voters to encourage them to participate with this voting method.

In a state that was narrowly won by President Trump in 2016, every vote counts.

Supreme Court just made it easier for Rhode Island to pull off mail-in voting scheme

Rhode Island – A state requirement for mail-in voting in Rhode Island, that has been on the books for over four decades, is being flouted by way of invoking the pandemic.

This requirement specifically obliged having two witness signatures present, or a notary sign-off on a mail-in ballot before a voter sends it out in the mail.

But since people shouldn’t be congregating, the requirement is being ignored this election season.

Rhode Island state officials suspended the need to have two witness signatures or notary sign-offs for mail-in ballots, which the Supreme Court allowed to continue unabridged on August 13th.

The Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Rhode Island sought the interjection from the high court, but the effort didn’t reach the conclusion those parties wanted.

The court noted that “no state official has expressed opposition,” against placing the witness signature requirement on hold for mail-in ballots in Rhode Island this year, which seems to have heavily influenced the decision in this matter.

This suspension of the 1978 requirement was first used in Rhode Island for the state’s primaries on June 2nd, a move enacted by Democratic Governor Gina Raimondo while pandemic concerns were in peak season.

Roughly a month after the June primaries, the ACLU decided to bring a lawsuit against Rhode Island, saying that because of health concerns, this witness requirement for mail-in voting should be halted for both the September 8th primaries and the general elections in November.

This brought more fodder to the Supreme Court’s decision in not forcing Rhode Island to enforce the requirement, since it has previously transpired in June, and those tasked with enforcing the requirement aren’t against placing it on hold:

“[In] similar cases where a State defends its own law, here the state election officials support the challenged decree, and no state official has expressed opposition…The status quo is one in which the challenged requirement has not been in effect, given the rules used in Rhode Island’s last election, and many Rhode Island voters may well hold that belief.”

While members of the ACLU were thrilled with the court’s decision, members of the Rhode Island Republican Party were disappointed in how the court responded.

RIRP Chair Sue Cienki stated the following about the matter:

“We fear that this decision will create more, not less confusion.”

This confusion is in reference to the recent NAACP lawsuit in Alabama where the Supreme Court upheld the state’s right to enforce witness signatures on absentee ballots earlier in July.

However, the difference being that in these two cases, the state of Alabama was fighting to uphold election fraud safeguards, whereas the state of Rhode Island was the one to suspend the requirement.

As for Rhode Island, September’s primary includes both houses of the General Assembly, two seats in congress, and one seat within the Senate. For the September primary, the final day to request a mail-in ballot is on August 18th. Regarding the November election, the final day to request a mail-in ballot is on October 13th.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
Proposed bill in New Jersey would allow illegal immigrants to obtain professional and occupational licenses

Recently, the mail-in voting process has come under fire as more and more evidence of mishaps keep arising.

According to The Center for Voter Information, more than half-million inaccurate applications for absentee ballots were sent by mistake to people all across Virginia. Some of the ballots were sent to dead people, the wrong relative and/or residence, and comically, to pets.

This calamity was flagged by several people receiving the improper ballots such as election monitors, members of the League of Women Voters and a retired FBI agent.

The Center for Voter Information said the absentee application mailings were sent to “eligible voters” in the state and “some of the mailers may have directed the return envelopes” for the absentee applications to the wrong election offices.

The counties that were effected included Fairfax City, Fairfax County, Franklin City, Franklin County, Richmond City, Richmond County, Roanoke City and Roanoke County. 

The Center for Voter Information said in a statement:

“Approximately half a million applications sent to eligible voters in Virginia included incorrect information, and we are working diligently to address the issues. Mistakes in our programming are very rare, but we take them seriously, and our methods overall are extraordinarily effective,” 

The statement continued:

“We know that voters are on high alert as the November election approaches, and we regret adding to any confusion. Please rest assured that we are working with local election officials in Virginia to re-direct the vote-by-mail applications to the proper locations, and will rectify any errors at our own expense,” 

The Center uses the Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Company for their ballot printing. President and CEO, Jonathan Shapiro, responded to the mistake, saying:

“occurred because we incorrectly aligned a spreadsheet that matched the voter with their local election office.”

He went on to say the mistake:

“created confusion for voters who are trying to exercise their right to vote from home, safely and conveniently.”

The Center for Voter Information, and similar groups rely on information in the state’s official voter registration database.

According to Just the News, they asked the Virginia Department of Elections if it is working on updating the voter registration database so third party groups do not send absentee ballot applications to the wrong addresses or to deceased people.

The department spokesperson said:

“The Virginia Department of Elections does not coordinate with third parties on campaign efforts. You will have to contact the third party group directly regarding their data source,”

They continued:

“Regarding our records management, the Department engages in ongoing and extensive annual and monthly list file maintenance processes.”

The centers website makes a statement about the mailings, encouraging people to submit their ballot requests directly on the website. 

The statement reads:

“The Virginia Department of Elections has no affiliation with this group nor coordinates with any third party groups on campaign efforts. We are aware that voters in multiple localities that received an absentee ballot application were given pre-paid return envelopes addressed to the incorrect registrar’s office,” 

It continues:

“The Virginia Department of Elections encourages all voters that would like to receive an absentee ballot for the November election to apply electronically on our website www.elections.virginia.gov/voterinformation.

Any applications that arrive in the wrong locality’s office will be forwarded immediately to the correct office for processing. If you have already applied for an absentee ballot, you do not need to submit a new application.

The first day that absentee ballots will be mailed is September 18, 2020,” 

Senior legal advisor for the Trump campaign, Jenna Ellis, commented on the absentee ballot application problems that occurred in Virginia, and compared it to what could happen in Nevada.

She said:

“Imagine if these applications were live ballots mailed out”

She continued:

“That’s what’s going to happen in Nevada under their recently passed AB4, and what Democrats are pushing for nationally.

What will stop a ‘printing flub’ for actual ballots under a universal vote-by-mail system? President Trump warned about these dangers months ago.

The Democrats’ plan to intentionally undermine election security will cause incalculable chaos unless we have securities that our campaign lawsuits are insisting on to protect all voters.”

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

 

Share:
Related Posts