Democrat call for unity? Top Biden staffer calls Republicans a ‘bunch of f-ckers’


 A Joe Biden staffer managed to betray her feelings regarding what she thinks of Republicans when being interviewed by Glamour magazine – and her sentiments toward Republicans is that they’re just a “bunch of fuckers”. 

Jen O’Malley Dillon participated in an interview with Glamour that carried an article title befitting of the magazine, which was “Glennon Doyle and Biden Campaign Manager Jen O’Malley Dillon on Politics, Motherhood, and Doing Hard Things.”

At first glance at such an innocuous article title, one would likely expect to be regaled with some fluff-piece article that would talk about things like how ‘being a mom is the toughest job in the world’ or something to that effect. 

And to be honest, those sort of fluff-piece aspects were present. But what one wouldn’t expect is to see that Biden’s top staffer is not only a pretty crass individual regarding her phraseology, she literally thinks Republicans are collectively terrible people. 

During the interview, Jen O’Malley Dillon was asked about her take on bipartisan “compromise” with regard to the upcoming Biden administration, to which she afforded the following response: 

“Yes, exactly. And frankly, [compromise is] what we need. The president-elect was able to connect with people over this sense of unity. In the primary, people would mock him, like, ‘You think you can work with Republicans?’ I’m not saying they’re not a bunch of fuckers. Mitch McConnell is terrible.”

“But this sense that you couldn’t wish for that, you couldn’t wish for this bipartisan ideal? He rejected that. From start to finish, he set out with this idea that unity was possible, that together we are stronger, that we, as a country, need healing, and our politics needs that too.”

So, to be clear, Jen O’Malley Dillon broad-brushes Republicans as being a “bunch of fuckers,” and then lauds Biden for his “idea that unity was possible”.

It is the epitome of nonsense to champion the notion of endeavors like “compromise” and “unity” and then within the same breath, refer to those with whom your to engage in said efforts with as “fuckers’. 

I’m pretty sure anyone that has been married or in a long term relationship could attest that “compromise” was never achieved with their significant other during a disagreement by saying something like ‘hey, we need to work this out – not saying you weren’t just acting like a fucker or anything.

Outside of O’Malley Dillon’s pretty dumb take on how to characterize Republicans, there were levels of peak cringe peppered throughout the article/interview. 

This author had nearly spat out his coffee mid-sip when seeing the interviewer – Glennon Doyle – start the interview off with saying:

“So to start: Thank you for being here and for saving the world.”

Apparently, “saving the world” has been so cheapened that someone doing their job as a presidential campaign manager is tantamount to when Bruce Willis’ character sacrificed himself to stop an asteroid from destroying Earth in the movie Armageddon. 

I suppose we all need to cue the song “I Don’t Want to Miss a Thing” by Aerosmith anytime O’Malley Dillon enters a room, because she saved the world

The only clichés this article was missing were the use of the words ‘stunning’ or ‘brave’. The article even alleged that O’Malley Dillon had to “fight a cascade of misinformation” during her time on the campaign – that timeframe being March 12 of 2020 up until November 4th. 

Exactly what misinformation was swirling around regarding the Biden campaign during that 8-month period?

Oh sure, Biden was criticized for things he actually said on the campaign trail (remember, “you ain’t black”?) – and pundits speculated whether Biden was…mentally sound. 

However, speculation and criticism isn’t “misinformation”. 

But hey, at least we’ve got that “unity” thing going on, despite roughly half of the country being referred to as a “bunch of fuckers”.

So stunning. 

So brave. 

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Speaking of the Biden campaign, turns out most likely voters polled believed that Hunter Biden’s reported controversies were intentionally muffled to help Biden out during the election. 

Here’s that previous report.


In the weeks leading up to the November election, there were numerous reports swirling around related to Hunter Biden’s alleged sketchy dealings – that also happened to be widely ignored by a majority of the mainstream media. 

In response, Rasmussen conducted a polling of likely voters to see if they believed that said ignoring by many mainstay media outlets was intentional.

The verdict shows that a majority of people believed just that.

There were merely three questions present within the survey, but the most prominent one was asking whether respondents considered the Hunter Biden story was ignored to help Joe Biden or whether news outlets simply thought they were “partisan” attacks against the Bidens:

“Now that Hunter Biden has acknowledged he is under investigation for tax evasion, many news organizations are starting to take a first look at his overseas business dealings which were first reported several weeks prior to Election Day.”

“Which is closer to your thinking – that many news organizations ignored the Hunter Biden story to help Joe Biden’s presidential campaign or that many ignored the story because they felt it was a partisan hit job?”

In response, over half of those polled agreed that news outlets were turning a blind eye to the Hunter Biden story to help Joe’s White House aspirations:

“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters think many news organizations ignored the Hunter Biden story to help his father’s presidential campaign.”

“Thirty-two percent (32%) disagree and say they ignored it because they felt it was a partisan hit job. Seventeen percent (17%) are not sure.”

Another interesting question asked from those who were polled inquired on whether they believed that Joe Biden managed to be involved and profit from Hunter’s endeavors abroad:

“How likely is it that Joe Biden was consulted about and perhaps profited from his son Hunter’s overseas business deals including at least one involving a company in mainland China – very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely or not at all likely?”

Turns out that even a higher percentage of people polled believe that Joe Biden pocketed some coin due to Hunter’s business dealings: 

“Fifty-six percent (56%) believe it is likely Joe Biden was consulted about and perhaps profited from his son’s overseas business deals including at least one involving a company in mainland China. This includes 43% who say it’s Very Likely.”

“Thirty-eight percent (38%) still consider this connection unlikely, with 22% who say it’s Not At All Likely.”

Apparently, with regard to perception on whether Joe and Hunter Biden were both getting enriched from Hunter’s dealings overseas, this overwhelming sentiment that Joe was pocketing some profits hasn’t changed much since October

When it came to breaking results down from a party affiliation aspect, it wasn’t much of a surprise to see that Republicans were more likely than Democrats or those not claiming a party affiliation believed that Joe and Hunter Biden were in cahoots business-wise. 

According to the report on that breakdown: 

“GOP voters (73%) are far more likely than Democrats (21%) and unaffiliateds (36%) to consider it Very Likely that Joe Biden was consulted about and perhaps profited from his son’s overseas business deals.”

As for the third question that was featured in the survey, respondents were asked how closely they’ve been following the Hunter Biden story. The results from that inquiry showed: 

“Seventy percent (70%) of voters say they have been closely following news reports about Hunter Biden’s business dealings, with 38% who have been following Very Closely.”

The survey in question was conducted between December 13th and 14th, which polled 1,000 likely voters. The margin of sampling error is said to be between +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence, according to Rasmussen. 

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Submit a Correction
Related Posts