I always thought that ‘setting the bar’ was analogous with high jumping, with the bar running horizontal and being raided higher every time someone cleared it.
In another leg of their race to be the first state to jump off the Cliffs of Rational Thought and Logic, California continues to clear their own bar, only to reset it and try again. The problem is…their bar is standing vertically and every time they clear it, they move it further to the left.
Yesterday, we ran an article that touched base on anti-cop and anti-Trump curriculum being pushed on public school kids around the country, kids of varying ages.
After running that piece, the following was brought to our attention.
There is a proposed update to California public school curriculum that includes anti-Israel programming and also aims to teach students a one-sided view of police officers and police brutality.
The Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, proposed by the California Department of Education, includes anti-Israel bias and aims to teach students about the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, a Palestinian-led anti-Israel initiative. The curriculum also has students study issues of police brutality and asks teachers to find incidents of bias by police in their own communities.
The “Black Lives Matter and Social Change” portion of the curriculum is aimed at grades 9–12. The purpose of this lesson is to expose students “to contemporary discussions around policing in the U.S., specifically police brutality cases where unarmed African Americans have been killed.”
The teachers will be asked to find and discuss “a recent incident in your community where an African American has been subjected to racial profiling or police brutality.” Students will also be required to read “41 Bullets Off-Broadway,” a poem by Wille Perdomo.
Perdomo’s poem includes rhetoric such as:
“You bumped into four cops who happened to/wake up with a bad case of contagious shooting,”
“Before your mother kissed you goodbye/she forgot to tell you that American kids/get massacred in gym class and shot during Sunday sermon.”
Another line reads:
“The mayor told them to take a few days off/and when they came back/he sent them to go beat up a million young black men.”
This is far from poetry and is much more an example of ‘false narrative advancement and leftist ideology brainwashing.”
Californian’s had to know what they were going to get themselves into when they elected Gavin Newsom to replace Jerry Brown.
Yesterday, we told you about what was happening in Pennsylvania,
“I don’t even see what’s wrong with the story. People are so goddamn ridiculous,” one person shared.
This is what one commenter had to say on the Pittsburgh Public School System’s Facebook page regarding a first-grade reading assignment. Parents of children attending an elementary school in Pittsburgh were stunned when their students brought home an assignment about two young boys running from the police.
And what is wrong with it? We have enough indoctrination going on in public schools. The last thing we need is for a room full of 6-year old kids to be reading assignments that make light of running from cops.
Pittsburgh Public Schools assured families that the assignment is not part of the regular curriculum and staff are looking into how it landed in a classroom. Still, parents and community members are outraged by the worksheet.
Parents shared photos on social media detailing the assignment, which reads:
“Tom will run. He will run from the cop. Tom will run with Rob. They will not stop. Look at the cop. The cop has a big mop. What will he do with the mop? Tom falls on a log. Rob falls in the pond. ‘Get them!’ yells the cop to his dog. The dog gets Tom and Rob. Rob’s socks is wet from the pond.”
“Why on earth did a teacher think this was a good idea for a homework exercise? Who wrote this drivel in the first place?” someone shared on the Pittsburgh Public Schools Facebook page. “On top of that, there is this little gem: ‘Rob’s socks is wet from the pond.’ So much for teaching proper grammar.”
Pittsburgh Public Schools issued a statement about the assignment:
“The worksheet is not a part of the District’s curriculum or intervention programs. While we continue to support teacher autonomy to supplement classroom materials to meet the needs of their students, we must ensure that all materials placed in front of our students are culturally responsive, validating and affirming their cultural and ethnic identities. The District is investigating the source of the materials. As this is a personnel matter, no further information is available.”
Ladodie Whiters, who shared the image, wrote, “This is what they are teaching in our Elementary schools in Pittsburgh. Really run from cops. They couldn’t think of no other story to teach them sight words huh?”
Many worried that such a story might confuse young children and cause them to think it was fun or harmless to run from police.
“You think it’s funny to teach our children at a 1st grade level to run from cops with the current climate in law enforcement?” a Facebook user shared. “It is appalling and offensive.”
But some thought the assignment was innocent.
“Everything now a days offends ppl,” another said.
Superintendent Anthony Hamlet expressed his “dismay” in a statement shared with TODAY Parents.
“The homework assignment, which has been circulated throughout social media, has justifiably caused outrage among families, staff and community,” the statement said in part.
He goes on to say that it violates school policy.
“Not only does the content send the wrong message to our students, but it also does not meet our expectations for student instruction. We also recognize it is our responsibility to alert educators of their blind spots related to implicit bias, colorblindness, and micro-aggressions.”
Law enforcement are not the only people that are being targeted in the educational sphere.
Did you know that Law Enforcement Today has a private new home for those who support emergency responders and veterans? It’s called LET Unity, and it’s where we share the untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Every penny gets reinvested into giving these heroes a voice. Check it out today.
Not to be outdone, a Palm Beach Gardens teacher was reassigned after a question on a quiz referred to President Trump as an “idiot.”
The incident happened in a Computer Applications class at Watson B. Duncan Middle School, said the school’s principal in a letter that was sent to the parents following the incident.
According to a tweet posted by a parent who says his daughter was in the class, the question reads, “45th Pres; 2017; Republican; Real Estate businessman; Idiot.” The question was multiple choice and had several answers, which included Donald Trump.
“My daughter was doing her homework at the dinner table and she said to me, ‘Daddy, you gotta see this question.’ I took one look and it was very unacceptable,” said a father of a student.
The father who wished to remain anonymous.
“It’s an obvious example of indoctrination at our school system where teachers are forcing their opinions on our children. This is the first time I actually saw it in writing. It’s quite a different thing than when I hear it verbally.”
The school’s principal released a statement to the school’s parents that read:
“A question on a quiz given by your child’s Computer Applications teacher yesterday, was brought to my attention this morning. The question was inappropriate and demonstrated an unacceptable lack of good judgement on the part of the teacher.
An investigation is now underway, and the teacher has been reassigned during this process. Because this is an open inquiry, I am not at liberty to sharer any additional details with you at this point.
I apologize for this incident, and for the offensive verbiage used in the question. Thank you for your patience, and your continued support of Watson B. Duncan Middle School.”
However, those almost seem tame in comparison to this one.
Parents in North Carolina‘s Charlotte–Mecklenburg Schools are angry students were directed to read a book with anti-police overtones, and whose authors have been peddling the false narrative that Michael Brown was murdered by Ferguson, Mo., police.
The Charlotte–Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police want the book banned from schools.
“The last thing we want is kids to be viewing police officers as a social injustice that they can’t trust,” police union spokesman Chris Kopp told WSOC-TV in Charlotte. “We want them to be able to go towards these officers.”
Eighth graders at Bailey Middle School in Cornelius were given “All American Boys” as a reading assignment.
The authors of the book, Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely, have a skewed view of Brown’s shooting in 2014 that spawned Black Lives Matter movement, stirred violent riots and created the “Hands up, don’t shoot” slogan.
“The Mike Brown case, that was the final straw” that inspired us to write the fictional book, Reynolds has previously stated.”
They claimed that their hopes were that the book would encourage school children to talk in a safe space about their feelings regarding police brutality against minorities.
It initially appeared that the Obama Justice Department would side with rioters over law-enforcement, but a subsequent investigation cleared Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson of any wrongdoing in the 2014 shooting, ruling it was justified self-defense.
Brown, who had robbed a convenience store and assaulted the clerk earlier that day, according to surveillance video, appeared to be under the influence and was confrontational when police stopped him, seemingly attempting to wrestle Wilson’s gun away. He then rushed toward the officer aggressively before he was shot.
According to Liberty Headlines, the false narrative that Brown was an innocent victim persists, however—not just in the authors’ minds, but in recent statements by Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Kamala Harris, D-Calif., both presidential candidates, who claimed on the five-year anniversary that Brown was murdered by police.
That’s the sort of mendacity parents of the middle schoolers protested in the reading assignment, even though the school district said no complaints were lodged.
“I was heartbroken, first of all,” said Mandy Giannini, a 19-year law-enforcement veteran and school parent. She called the book one-sided and anti-police. “My children worry about me enough as it is.”
Police say the book reading unnecessarily reopens a community wound. A state of emergency was declared in Charlotte in 2016 after violent unrest over the police fatal shooting of an armed black man. Officers were cleared of any wrongdoing.
“The book remains on our assigned reading list pending the outcome of the challenge process,” Bailey Middle School Principal Chad Thomas told WSOC. He said the school’s role is “to build critical thinking skills and present alternative points of view.”
Editorial reviews of the book on Amazon include some doozies.
“With Reynolds writing Rashad’s first-person narrative and Kiely Quinn’s, this hard-edged, ripped-from-the-headlines book is more than a problem novel; it’s a carefully plotted, psychologically acute, character-driven work of fiction that dramatizes an all-too-frequent occurrence. Police brutality and race relations in America are issues that demand debate and discussion, which his superb book powerfully enables.”– Booklist.
Rashad Butler is a quiet, artistic teen who hates ROTC but dutifully attends because father insists “there’s no better opportunity for a black boy in this country than to join the army.” He heads to Jerry’s corner store on a Friday night to buy chips, and ends up the victim of unwarranted arrest and police brutality: an event his white schoolmate Quinn Collins witnesses in terrified disbelief.
Quinn is even more shocked because the cop is Paul Galluzzo, older brother of his best friend and Quinn’s mentor since his father died in Afghanistan. As events unfold, both boys are forced to confront the knowledge that racism in America has not disappeared and that change will not come unless they step forward. Reynolds and Kiely’s collaborative effort deftly explores the aftermath of police brutality, addressing the fear, confusion, and anger that affects entire communities.
Diverse perspectives are presented in a manner that feels organic to the narrative, further emphasizing the tension created when privilege and racism cannot be ignored. Timely and powerful, this novel promises to have an impact long after the pages stop turning. VERDICT Great for fostering discussions about current events among teenage audiences. A must-have for all collections.—Ashleigh Williams, School Library Journal