Unhinged ‘Squad Member’ Rep. Cori Bush claims Rittenhouse trial means white supremacists “can shoot at us”

Share:

The following contains editorial content written by a retired Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today. 

There is a lot of competition for the biggest lunatic in Congress amongst the Democrats, however the former champion Maxine Waters has officially been replaced by Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO). She isn’t even trying to operate in the realm of either reality or common sense anymore, not that she ever was.

This week, Bush was speaking about the high-profile trial of Kyle Rittenhouse in Wisconsin whereby she (and many who inhabit far-left loonyville) is inserting race into the issue.

In a statement that borders on the insane, Bush claimed that an acquittal of Rittenhouse meant it was “open season” on black Americans at the hands of white supremacists, according to a report in Breitbart News. For perspective, let’s examine a few facts.

Rittenhouse is white…Joseph Rosenbaum (whom he shot) is white…so is Anthony Huber…as well as Gaige Grosskreutz. The judge is white, the prosecutors are white and so are the defense attorneys. So on what planet has this become a trial about “white supremacy,” “white privilege,” or race?

The one single racial component, if you will, to this whole case is the initial police shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man who was armed with a knife who was shot by police officers and justifiably so. Of course the media, leftist politicians and others started pushing the typical narrative, and the mob took that as their cue to do what they do best…loot, burn, and destroy things. That is what brought Kyle Rittenhouse to Kenosha, a city where his father and grandmother live…his family, his second home.

Bush, who clearly appears to suffer from some type of psychological disorder still believes that Michael Brown, a criminal thug who tried to disarm a Ferguson, Missouri police officer and shoot him, was instead “murdered” by that officer, Darren Wilson, a lie which Bush repeated on Monday.

Building upon that lie, Bush claimed that during the riots which of course took place in Ferguson after Brown’s death, white supremacists in the city allegedly would “hide up in the hills” and shoot at protesters. The problem with Bush’s statement? According to the Ferguson police chief, that never happened.

“When we marched in Ferguson, white supremacists would hide behind a hill near where Michael Brown Jr. was murdered and shoot at us,” Bush said. “They never faced consequences. If Kyle Rittenhouse gets acquitted, it tells them that even 7 years later they can still get away with it,” the unhinged Bush tweeted.

There is a lot of competition for the biggest lunatic in Congress amongst the Democrats, however the former champion Maxine Waters has officially been replaced by Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO). She isn’t even trying to operate in the realm of either reality or common sense anymore.

This week, Bush was speaking about the high-profile trial of Kyle Rittenhouse in Wisconsin which she (and many who inhabit far-left loonyville) is inserting race into the issue. In a statement that borders on the insane, Bush claimed that an acquittal of Rittenhouse meant it was “open season” on black Americans at the hands of white supremacists, according to a report in Breitbart News. For perspective, let’s examine a few facts.

Rittenhouse is white…Joseph Rosenbaum (whom he shot) is white…so is Anthony Huber…as well as Gaige Grosskreutz. The judge is white, the prosecutors are white and so are the defense attorneys. So on what planet has this become a trial about “white supremacy,” “white privilege,” or race?

The one single racial component, if you will, to this whole case is the initial police shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man who was armed with a knife who was shot by police officers, justifiably so. Of course the media, leftist politicians and others started pushing the narrative, and the mob took that as their cue to do what they do best…loot, burn, and destroy. That is what brought Kyle Rittenhouse to Kenosha, a city where his father and grandmother live…his family, his second home.

Bush, who clearly appears to suffer from some type of psychological disorder still believes that Michael Brown, a criminal thug who tried to disarm a Ferguson, Missouri police officer and probably shoot him, was instead “murdered” by that officer, Darren Wilson, a lie which Bush repeated on Monday.

Building upon that lie, Bush claimed that during the riots which of course took place in Ferguson after Brown’s death, white supremacists in the city allegedly would “hide up in the hills” and shoot at protesters. The problem with Bush’s statement? According to the Ferguson police chief, that never happened.

“When we marched in Ferguson, white supremacists would hide behind a hill near where Michael Brown Jr. was murdered and shoot at us,” Bush said. “They never faced consequences. If Kyle Rittenhouse gets acquitted, it tells them that even 7 years later they can still get away with it,” the unhinged Bush tweeted.

A Black Lives Matter activist named Ohun Ashe also claimed Bush’s statement to be “facts”:

“This is FACTS! I vividly remember hiding under porches in Canfield as shots were fired at us. No one came to help us. We would come from under porches using cars as shields in between gun shots to make it out,” Ashe tweeted.

A spokesperson for Bush was unable to provide specifics of Bush’s allegations other than to claim white supremacists shot at Bush and others during the rioting in Ferguson.

“While on the frontlines of the Ferguson uprising, Congresswoman Bush and other activists were shot at by white supremacist vigilantes. The question we need to ask is why white supremacists feel empowered to open-carry rifles, incite violence, and put black lives at risk across our country,” the spokesperson said.

The only issue with Bush’s claim about getting “shot at by white supremacists” is that it is a bold-faced lie, and that is according to Ferguson’s black police chief, Frank McCall Jr., who said the Ferguson police department has no record of any such incident(s) happening.

“Not that I’m aware of,” McCall told the Webster County Citizen.

While several armed members of the Oath Keepers spent some time in Ferguson during that time, no members of that group or for example the KKK were ever charged in any shootings in the city. At the time, then-St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar called the presence of the Oath Keepers “both unnecessary and inflammatory.”

In fact, the only documented incident anywhere similar to what Bush described occurred in March 2015, where two police officers who were protecting the perimeter of the Ferguson Police Department were shot, which caused protesters to flee the area. The person charged in that incident, Jeffrey Williams was later arrested and convicted of the shooting. Williams is black, by the way.

“One officer was hit in the shoulder; the other in the cheek,” said the County Citizen. “Then St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said at the time he believed the officers were targeted, and the shooting brought swift condemnation from a wide range of public officials, as well as protest leaders, who insisted they repudiated violence.’

In testimony, Williams clamed he wasn’t shooting at police officers, but was allegedly returning fire at an “unidentified person” whom he said shot at his vehicle.

As a point of information, there do not appear to be any “hills” in Ferguson, Missouri…just to put Bush’s statement into context.

A Black Lives Matter activist named Ohun Ashe also claimed Bush’s statement to be “facts”:

“This is FACTS! I vividly remember hiding under porches in Canfield as shots were fired at us. No one came to help us. We would come from under porches using cars as shields in between gun shots to make it out,” Ashe tweeted.

A spokesperson for Bush was unable to provide specifics of Bush’s allegations other than to claim white supremacists shot at Bush and others during the rioting in Ferguson.

“While on the frontlines of the Ferguson uprising, Congresswoman Bush and other activists were shot at by white supremacist vigilantes. The question we need to ask is why white supremacists feel empowered to open-carry rifles, incite violence, and put black lives at risk across our country,” the spokesperson said.

The only issue with Bush’s claim about getting “shot at by white supremacists” is that it is a bold-faced lie, and that is according to Ferguson’s black police chief, Frank McCall Jr., who said the Ferguson police department has no record of any such incident(s) happening.

“Not that I’m aware of,” McCall told the Webster County Citizen.

While several armed members of the Oath Keepers spent some time in Ferguson during that time, no members of that group or for example the KKK were ever charged in any shootings in the city. At the time, then-St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar called the presence of the Oath Keepers “both unnecessary and inflammatory.”

In fact, the only documented incident anywhere similar to what Bush described occurred in March 2015, where two police officers who were protecting the perimeter of the Ferguson Police Department were shot, which caused protesters to flee the area. The person charged in that incident, Jeffrey Williams was later arrested and convicted of the shooting. Williams is black, by the way.

“One officer was hit in the shoulder; the other in the cheek,” said the County Citizen. “Then St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said at the time he believed the officers were targeted, and the shooting brought swift condemnation from a wide range of public officials, as well as protest leaders, who insisted they repudiated violence.”

In testimony, Williams clamed he wasn’t shooting at police officers, but was allegedly returning fire at an “unidentified person” whom he said shot at his vehicle.

As a point of information, there do not appear to be any “hills” in Ferguson, Missouri…just to put Bush’s statement into context.

Cori Bush is not only the craziest member of Congress, but she is also one of the biggest hypocrites. A rabid supporter of the “defund the police” movment, Bush herself feels it is important to protect herself because, well she’s “important.” For more on that, we invite you to:

DIG DEEPER

After reports surfaced earlier in October detailing the latest campaign spending numbers that showed Rep. Cori Bush has shelled out over $130,000 for her personal security, the FEC data caused a resurfacing of her August interview where she defended her spending money on personal security while advocating for defunding the police.

On October 15th, new spending numbers released by the FEC detailed that Rep. Bush had spent an additional +$64,000 in private security, on top of the previously reported $70,000 that circulated this past August.

We at Law Enforcement Today had previously reported on Rep. Bush’s private security spending due to the glaring hypocrisy of her simultaneously calling to defund the police while she literally uses campaign money to enlist a private police force for herself.

When Rep. Bush was confronted this past August during a CBS interview over her funding personal security while actively championing the defunding of police, Rep. Bush had the following to say about the matter:

“They would rather I die? You would rather me die? Is that what you want to see? You want to see me die? You know, because that could be the alternative.

So either I spent $70,000 on private security over the last few months, and I’m here standing now and able to speak, able to help save 11 million people from being evicted. Or – I could possibly have a death attempt on my life.”

Rep. Bush continued during the interview, proclaiming that she was under threat from “the white supremacist racist narrative” and that her funding private security while calling to defund the police is because her “body is worth being on this planet right now.

She concluded with saying what she spends on personal security is irrelevant because she has “work to do” and that citizens need to “suck it up” because “defunding the police has to happen”:

“I’m gonna make sure I have security because I know I have had attempts on my life. And I have too much work to do, there are too many people that need help right now for me to allow that.

So if I end up spending $200,000, if I spend ten more dollars on it, you know what, I get to be here to do the work. So suck it up. Defunding the police has to happen. We need to defund the police and put that money into social safety nets.”

It’s hardly surprising to see that many look at the matter as being both hypocritical and completely tone deaf.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Back in July, we at Law Enforcement Today shared a report where Fox News host Trey Gowdy commented on this very topic of Rep. Bush funding personal security while wanting average citizens to be left devoid of the protections afforded by police.

Here’s that previous report.

_

Gowdy slams lawmakers’ double standards on defunding police efforts while funding private security for themselves

(Originally published July 28th, 2021)

Trey Gowdy from Fox News’ “Sunday Night in America” ripped into lawmakers that have been funding private security for themselves while they also attempt to defund the police for everyday citizens in America.

During the July 25th broadcast of “Sunday Night I America”, show host Trey Gowdy opened with how there are very real dangers that members of Congress can encounter while making public appearances:

“Members of Congress are spending more money than ever on their personal security. It’s a tragic reflection of the times we live in. Gabby Giffords was shot meeting with constituents in Arizona.

Steve Scalise was shot practicing for a charity baseball game. Elected officials on both sides of the aisle have been threatened with all manner of violence.”

After highlighting some of the unfortunate dangers with being a public official, Gowdy also pointed out that elected officials, like members of Congress, have no shortage of police and security at their fingertips:

“Members of Congress are allowed to spend campaign money on their safety. Some members of Congress even travel with personal security when they’re in their districts and states.

There’s also a police presence when requested for members of Congress. The Capitol itself is heavily guarded – police are everywhere – there are metal detectors and dogs trained to detect guns, and explosives and panic buttons and restricted access. You name it, and it’s there.”

But Gowdy then shifted to asking the audience whether they feel as safe, rhetorically asking whether an average citizen has a police presence or observable general safety measures that somewhat resemble that of an elected official’s:

“Safety is priority number one for members of Congress, as it should be. But what about you? Are you safe? Do you feel safe?

Could your neighborhood benefit from a greater police presence? Is your place of work armed with metal detectors and guard dogs? Are the streets you walk, and ride down lined with police cars? Do you have personal security when you travel?”

Gowdy brought the point home, noting that while he understands why members of Congress are concerned for their personal safety – and receive a quality of security unmatched to regular citizens – he can’t understand why those same Congress members would entertain lessening police availability for average citizens:

“I understand full well why members of Congress spend money on their personal safety. I just don’t understand why some members of Congress don’t feel the same way about your safety. If their safety is the highest priority, shouldn’t your safety be, too?”

One of the Congress members that Gowdy brought up was Rep. Cori Bush, one of the biggest proponents for defunding police, who seems to fancy the idea of police and security when it comes to her own wellbeing:

“Cori Bush represents St. Louis, Missouri in Congress. She wants to defund the police. Well, let me be more precise – she wants to defund your police. But not her police.

She spent nearly $70,000 on her own personal security last year. I don’t know about your city or state, but $70,000 would get you your own personal police officer in South Carolina – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.”

Gowdy capped the take off with noting that Congress members like Rep. Bush seem to think they’re better and more worthy of protection than regular Americans:

“Cori Bush tells us she’s progressive. The better word might be hypocritical. She wants to defund your police while she has a robust personal security detail in Washington and St. Louis. And that sends the clear message that her safety is more important than yours.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Rep. Cori Bush wants to ‘defund the police’, but spent taxpayer money on her private security

(Originally published June 5th, 2021)

MISSOURI– Democratic Missouri Rep. Cori Bush has been an outspoken advocate of the Black Lives Matter organization, and has openly pushed for the defunding of police. 

Law Enforcement Today recently reported that Bush even went as far as to praise the Black Lives Matter activist who wished death upon police officers and said “fry ’em like bacon.”

It is very interesting, that a woman who feels such hatred for police officers, and pushed to defund them, used taxpayers money to hire them to protect her through a private security company, according to newly released Statement of Disbursements of the House records reviewed by the Daily Caller.

Bush, who has become the newest member of the hypocritical progressive-Democratic group in Congress known as “the Squad”, falls right in line with her fellow Congresswomen, as back in April, it was reported that they too spent thousands of campaign funds on private security protection for themselves. 

According to the new Statement of Disbursements of the House records, Bush also spent taxpayer funds on a day of private security for herself between Jan. 1 to March 31, the Daily Caller reported.

On February 19, 2021, Bush reportedly spent $880.00 on private security services through RSAT Security Consulting LLC.

The company’s Facebook page says that RSAT Security Consulting is led by a team with “50+ years of experience across national security, energy security, police, and military security operations.”

RSAT’s Instagram page shows photos of police officers, military members, and members of the Secret Service.

Additionally, according to Bush’s April Quarterly 2021 financial report, she spent over $30,000 on her own private security, while demanding that police be defunded. 

As the Daily Caller reported, Bush’s financial records show that:

  • On Jan. 18, 2021, Bush spent $1,060.00 on security from Whole Armor Executive Protection in Bowie, Maryland.
  • On Jan. 21, 2021, Bush spent $5,000 on security from Nathaniel Davis, Jr in her home state.
  • On Jan. 25, 2021, Bush spent $530.00 on security from Nathaniel Davis in Palo Alto, Calif.
  • On Feb. 17, 2021, Bush spent $7,743.75 on security from RS&T Security Counseling LLC in New York City.
  • On Feb. 25, 2021, Bush spent $5,000 on security from Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birk in Washington DC.
  • On Feb. 26, 2021, Bush spent $5,812.00 on security from RS&T Security Counseling, LLC in NYC.
  • On March 15, 2021, Bush spent $5,000 on security from Nathaniel Davis Davis, in Saint Louis, Missouri.
  • On March 15, 2021, Bush spent $2,456.25 on security from RS&T Security Consulting LLC in NYC.

Bush even called out former President Barack Obama via Twitter for not defunding the police in December 2020, after Obama called the term “defund the police” a “snappy slogan”. 

Bush said in the tweet:

“With all due respect, Mr. President—let’s talk about losing people. We lost Michael Brown Jr. We lost Breonna Taylor. We’re losing our loved ones to police violence. It’s not a slogan. It’s a mandate for keeping our people alive. Defund the police,” 

_

Editor note: In 2020, we saw a nationwide push to “defund the police”.  While we all stood here shaking our heads wondering if these people were serious… they cut billions of dollars in funding for police officers.  And as a result, crime has skyrocketed – all while the same politicians who said “you don’t need guns, the government will protect you” continued their attacks on both our police officers and our Second Amendment rights.

And that’s exactly why we’re launching this national crowdfunding campaign as part of our efforts to help “re-fund the police”.

For those looking for a quick link to get in the fight and support the cause, click here.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
 
Facebook Follow First

 

Share:
Related Posts