Black Lives Matter protesters assault Christians demonstrating at statue of King Louis IX in St. Louis

Share:

ST LOUIS, MO – As if rioting, looting, vandalizing statues, general assaults and murders weren’t enough already when observing the Black Lives Matter protests – you can now add assaulting Christians who were peacefully praying at a demonstration to the list of reasons to admonish the current “movement.”

Because nothing says you’re against police brutality more than attacking people who were simply praying.

The violence started when people were gathering outside of the King Louis IX statue located in St. Louis’ Forest Park on June 27th. Umar Lee was said to have been the organizer of the Black Lives Matter rally that was slated for the 27th aimed at protesting the statue in question.

The monument has been present within the park for over 100 years, and has served as a symbol of faith for many based upon his endeavors of being a devout Catholic and aiding in the construction of the famous Sainte-Chapelle.

However, to the protesters who were organizing the rally against the statue of the King Louis IX, they stated that he was “anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, and an anti-black crusader,” and Lee also added:

“He does not need to be on public property overlooking our city.”

Apparently, Lee must have missed the part where King Louis IX was also the only French monarch to have been venerated as a saint.

Plus, the city of St. Louis is literally named after the French King. But that aspect hasn’t escaped Lee, as the BLM organizer is also trying to circulate a petition to rename the city.

When people arrived to simply demonstrate in support of the statue, that’s when violence reportedly broke out. One man, pictured below, was seen getting brutally assaulted by one of the rioters present.

Conor Martin, who was present during the protests, stated that the elderly gentleman assaulted during the protest was able to be removed from the area to safety:

“We got the elderly man out of there, and I was about to leave to retrieve my lunch as a friend of mine had just come over to tell me my food had arrived. The mob then approached him. They asked if he was with me, and when he said yes they began to berate him.”

Video showed the mob beginning to turn on those who simply helped the elderly person escape the violence enacted by the riotous individuals present. Martin provided additional context to the video above, stating:

“They took his walking stick from him and when he didn’t react they knocked his hat off of his head, called him a skin head, and attacked him. At this point I intervened to pull the attacker off of my friend, and I was attacked by the mob and the attacker.”

Martin has hopes of pressing charges against the attackers showcased in the video, but is calling for the public’s assistance in being able to identify them.

After the events and violence that took place in St. Louis on the 27th, Missouri State Representative Nick Schroer called on officials via Twitter to ensure that the criminals present during this demonstration get prosecuted:

“I call on @StLouisCityCA and @stlouispolice to take action and prosecute these criminals! This is not peaceful protesting, its a criminal attack (with a weapon) upon peaceful protestors. This must not happen in our country and they must be held accountable.”

The fact that Christians are being attacked with impunity on camera for simply praying by a statue of one of the most heralded saints is awfully telling of the state of affairs today.

LET has a private home for those who support emergency responders and veterans called LET Unity.  We reinvest the proceeds into sharing their untold stories. Click to check it out.

Murdered officer's grave desecrated before headstone even placed

It’s not just homages to saints that are being targeted, but also Hollywood icons. 

Apparently, proponents of the establishment-left are finding something new to be outraged over – and this time it’s about an airport named after “The Duke” himself.

Leaders within the Democratic Party of Orange County are said to be demanding that John Wayne’s name be removed from the local airport because of a near-50-year-old interview Wayne had.

The center of the modern controversy dates back to 1971, eight years before the famous movie star would pass away from stomach cancer, where Wayne was being interviewed by Playboy magazine.

The interview in question did host some unsavory aspects about some of Wayne’s views, and the following excerpt seems to be the most offensive given the current discourse throughout the country:

“With a lot of blacks, there’s quite a bit of resentment along with their dissent, and possibly rightfully so. But we can’t all of a sudden get down on our knees and turn everything over to the leadership of the blacks. I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.”

During the same interview, Wayne also referred to the movie “Midnight Cowboy” as being “a story about two fags,” which has not aged well either.

Some have also taken offense to Wayne saying “I don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them,” when asked about his stance on Native Americans during the 1971 interview.

Obviously, the manner in which Wayne phrased his sentiments at the time aren’t exactly something people would reflect kindly upon today. However, context is rather important, in that these are the words of a man who was born in 1907.

While the Civil Rights Act had already gone into effect seven years prior to the interview, we’re still reflecting on a single interview of someone who was born seven years before World War 1 even started.

In turn, a recent resolution was passed by the DPOC that called for the removal of John Wayne’s name and subsequent likeness be removed from the local airport, and to revert the name to the Orange County airport.

According to this resolution, the following was mentioned in reference to Wayne’s name being attributed to the airport:

“The Democratic Party of Orange County condemns John Wayne’s racist and bigoted statements, and calls for John Waynes’ name and likeness to be removed from the Orange County airport, and calls on the OC Board of Supervisors to restore its original name: Orange County Airport.”

Most would realistically be hard-pressed to avoid saying that Wayne’s words weren’t insensitive, but they were just representative of a time long ago as well. If one were to obliterate everything that could be tied to disparaging remarks, sentiments of the past, and so on – the country wouldn’t be left with much history at all.

However, there were some aspects about John Wayne that were what some would have called “progressive” while he was in his youth. In June of 1933, while Wayne was still in his 20s, he’d married Josephine Alicia Saenz (who was of Panamanian descent) after dating her for seven years.

History is complex, and not every aspect of it would live up to the standards of modern political correctness. There were some bright spots, and of course dark periods within American history as well as world history overall.

But at what point will the modern mob of the perpetually offended be satisfied?

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Share:
Related Posts