Biden team won’t denounce leftist group doxxing Supreme Court justices, planning pro-abortion protests at their homes

Share:

USA – In the wake of a leak that suggests the Supreme Court may soon overturn Roe v. Wade, a radical leftist group has doxxed six Supreme Court justices and is calling for protests at their homes.

Ruth Sent Us is a leftist organization named after the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Its website states:

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg spent her entire life moving the needle towards justice for all. She believed, and we believe that:

  • Women Deserve Trust
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Love Is Love
  • No Human Is Illegal.”

The organization further declares:

“Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights. 

“We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics.”

https://fundourpolice.com/

There appears to be no information on the site as to its financial backing, although the site offers “[s]tipends” for artists to create “[l]arge-scale art.”

On its homepage, Ruth Sent Us calls for “Walk-By Wednesday,” scheduled for Wednesday, May 11, 2022, to occur at the homes of six Supreme Court justices. The site characterizes its targets as “extremists” and “six Christian fundamentalist Justices.”

The website also hosts a map with the home sites of Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch each marked with a pin.

The map is accompanied by a description listing the street name for each residence.

The Ruth Sent Us website also links to “Strike for Choice,” scheduled for “May 8-15, while our Supreme Court considers reversing Roe vs. Wade by Summer 2022.”

On that page, pro-abortion leftists can express their determination to strike “paid work,” “unpaid labor,” or “school,” or share their commitment to help organizing striking events.

The Ruth Sent Us group is also calling for protests at Catholic Churches — on Mother’s Day, a day that affirms and honors the role of beloved mothers of children nationwide.

A recent tweet read:

“Whether you’re a “Catholic for Choice”, ex-Catholic, of other or no faith, recognize that six extremist Catholics set out to overturn Roe. 

“Stand at or in a local Catholic Church Sun May 8. #WarOnWomen #MothersDayStrike.”

As one would probably expect, pro-abortion protests, some violent, have already erupted across the country.

Church vandalism is also occurring.  One targeted Catholic church, the Sacred Heart of Mary Church in Boulder, CO, was defaced with multiple tags reading “bans off our bodies” and “my body my choice.”

Fox News reports that work crews had to erect fencing around the Supreme Court building due to protests.

Also according to Fox, there is now a “strong police presence” at the homes of Supreme Court justices following the leak.

Another organization, “Rise Up for Abortion Rights” is also preparing protests during a “week of action” starting on Mother’s Day.

The group is calling for Handmaids Tale-themed protests outside of churches on May 8, stating on its website:

“This action is called for by a collective of spanish speaking women’s rights groups + activists across the country, including from Bride’s March, Dominican Women’s Development Center, Ni Una Menus, and Las 17. 

“Several cities will be hosting protests outside of prominent churches in their towns, these can look like a group of people holding signs wearing Handmaids Tale outfits, passing out flyers outside to church goers or doing a die-in. MORE INFO COMING SOON.”

Not surprisingly, the Biden administration is evidently refusing to denounce the planned residential and church protests and the doxxing of Supreme Court justices.

According to the Washington Times, when the question on condemning these actions was raised to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on May 5, Psaki deflected, referring to the protests outside the Supreme Court as “peaceful.”

The Times continued:

“Asked if the president would waive off the activists who plan to go into residential neighborhoods, Ms. Psaki dodged the issue.

‘Our view here is that peaceful protest — there is a long history in the United States of that — and we certainly encourage people to keep it peaceful and not result in any level of violence,’ she said.”

Psaki deflected again when she was asked about Biden’s support of the publication of the addresses of Supreme Court justices, saying:

“Our view is that there’s a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across the country about what they saw in that leaked document.” 

She continued:

“We obviously want people’s privacy to be respected. 

“We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. 

“That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Any excuse to riot: Far-left anarchists take to streets to protest a non-Supreme Court decision

Originally published May 5, 2022

The following editorial is written by a current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today and reflects his personal opinion. 

Any excuse to riot and attack cops. Such is the case of the unhinged lunatics who apparently have no idea how this whole Constitution works.

Once word leaked that the Supreme Court appeared to be on the verge of overturning Roe v. Wade, miraculously the usual assortment of purple haired freaks that have zero risk of getting pregnant took to the streets with their professionally-made signs…almost as if the whole thing were orchestrated.

And that was only Monday.

On Tuesday, your typical throng of Antifa losers and baby-killing advocates took to the streets in cities across America, overwrought by the notion that the Supreme Court may have decided to send abortion decisions back to the states, as the United States Constitution provides for.

And as usual, the criminal thugs took it out on police officers, throwing rocks at police while smashing windows on police cars in cities such as Los Angeles. In a smack of sheer irony, the same people that want to send someone else to Ukraine to fight against Putin’s communist aggression were themselves carrying communist flags. Talk about hypocrisy.

In Los Angeles, the police department issued a citywide tactical alert after an unhinged group of about 250 rioters became violent. LAPD Chief Michel Moore said the rioters were ordered to disperse just after 9pm, however things just got worse afterward.

According to NBC Los Angeles: “Moore said the group began throwing rocks and bottles at the LAPD officers, and one officer was injured. An ambulance was called to the scene, but authorities could not confirm the officer’s condition.”

Videos were seen of police attempting to arrest one of the little dirtbags, however they were surrounded by a mob of rioters, which enabled him to escape.

The leftist temper tantrum followed the Monday night leak of a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito, stating that the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized the murder of children in the womb “was egregiously wrong from the start.”

On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the leaked opinion, calling it an “egregious breach” of trust, Yahoo News reported.

Ironically, the only ones who seemed concerned over what amounts to an insurrection against one of the three branches of government…a real insurrection…were conservatives and Republicans.

Democrats were too busy having a conniption fit over the possibility that one of their gods…abortion…was no longer a protected act in so far as the federal government is concerned.

So, the below video doesn’t show police being attacked, but it shows what  absolute unhinged lunatics some Democrats can be…who votes for these nuts anyway? Here is Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D) who apparently thinks of herself as “presidential material”:

Might we suggest perhaps some Prozac for Pocahontas?

Roberts dismissed the idea that the breach would in any way affect the work done by the high court.

“To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way.”

In a release, the entire court said:

“Justices circulate draft opinions internally as a routine and essential part of the Court’s confidential deliberative work. Although the document described in yesterday’s reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the Court of the final position of any member on the issues in the case.”

Despite the collective shit fit being displayed by the left, overturning Roe v. Wade would just serve to send abortion issues back to individual states, where they belong.

In other words, it would allow the people to democratically vote in their individual states for legislators who hold their particular opinion on killing babies, according to the New York Post.

For example, liberal hell holes such as New York, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, etc. would still be free to give a death sentence to as many unborn children as they wanted.

According to the New York Post, some 26 states would have some type of restrictions on abortion, among them Arizona, Georgia, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas.

The Post said that nine states in the U.S. have pre-Roe abortion restrictions still on the books in those states, 13 have a so-called “trigger ban” tied to Roe being overturned, and five states have laws passed after Roe restricting nearly all abortions. Four state constitutions ban abortions altogether.

The irony of the abortion fight vs. the argument over forced vaccines has seen the same people who scream “by body, my choice” about abortion are taking the position that the government has the right to force people to take an unproven vaccine or lose their liberty rights, such as employment.

Some have said that overturning Roe impacts a “woman’s right to choose.” Does that mean it doesn’t impact a “man’s right to choose,” since according to leftists, men can now get “pregnant?”

Besides, what is a woman? Are these people biologists? Because as we saw during the confirmation hearings of Justice-in-waiting Ketanji Brown Jackson, she could not define what a woman is because she’s “not a biologist.” So does Roe possibly being overturned indeed impact “women?” We’re not sure.

___________________

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
Facebook Follow First
Share:
Submit a Correction
Related Posts