As US military goes “woke,” China believed to be hiding missiles in shipping containers for “Trojan Horse” attacks


The following article contains editorial content written by a retired Police Chief and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today. 

BEIJING- As Joe Biden concerns himself with putting Americans who refuse to get experimental jab out of work, China (along with Russia and Iran) are on the move, with some military analysts believing Beijing may have more than cheap rubber dog shit (sorry, shameless Top Gun reference) inside those container ships now sitting off the coast of California.

Experts believe that China may be secretly developing “Trojan Horse-style missiles” secreted within shipping containers that could be released on enemy ports.

The analysts believe that Beijing’s significant fleet of freighters and fishing boats could be turned into warships utilizing secretive container missiles, the US Sun reports.

The containers, which look like regular shipping containers are able to be sneaked aboard vessels and would “blend in seamlessly” with the other containers on board the freighters.

Beijing—which has an overwhelming number of such container ships—would be able to secret such weapons on board vessels and the sheer number of such ships would make it nearly impossible to identify in the event of war.

As US military goes "woke," China believed to be hiding missiles in shipping containers for "Trojan Horse" attacks
China developing container ship missiles-YouTube screenshot

The term “Trojan Horse” is not an accidental term, with the ability of the Chinese to accomplish exactly what the Greeks did during the Trojan War, using a wooden horse to enter the city of Troy and defeat Greece.

Under such a scenario, China would be able to smuggle missiles either into or close to an enemy port and then unleashing them in a surprise attack.

According to Rick Fisher, senior fellow in Asian military affairs at the International Assessment and Strategy Center told The Sun online that while it has not been confirmed by Beijing that such weapons exist, it is likely they do in fact have them.

If China does in fact have such missiles, the Stockton Center for International Law notes they may be in violation of the Law of Naval Warfare, not the Beijing would necessarily concern itself with such a law.

“Failure to comply with the law of armed conflict by surreptitiously incorporating merchant vessels into China’s warfighting/war-sustaining effort endangers civilian seafarers and puts all civilian ships at risk that may be operating in the area of hostilities,” the Center wrote.

At the same time, a retired intelligence chief warns that such a container ship missile would present a significant threat to the US Navy. Retired Navy Capt. Jim Fanell warned about the significant danger such a weapon would pose to the US and our allies.

All of this comes about as tensions between the two superpowers has escalated, with Chinese President Xi Jinping recognizing the weakness of Joe Biden and his lack of focus on China while he concerns himself with pushing the radical agenda of far leftists in Congress and pushes vaccine mandates on American businesses.

China has been flexing its muscles, in particular since Biden took office, conscious of the weakness of a man who often times cannot speak coherently for more than a few seconds at a time.

They are aggressively developing their military  and recently tested a hypersonic missile which caught the Pentagon, focused on critical race theory and understanding “white rage,” off guard.

Sources say that the container ship missiles first appeared in 2016 at an arms fair and since that time, there has been speculation, now believed more than ever, that China now has the delivery system in service with the Chinese navy.

Fisher noted that such a weapon would meld in with China’s military strategy, and would likely be used as an offensive, first-strike weapon against the west, with the ability to smuggle such weapons into ports anywhere in the world.

Fisher told The Sun: “Chinese strategic preferences for surprise would strongly argue for acquisition” of such missiles.

He noted that any such missiles would be deployed in “nondescript small Chinese ships in order to mount surprise missile raids against shore defenses to assist or follow amphibious or airborne invasion forces.”

Fisher said such missile launchers are capable of being smuggled through ports or even via highway ports of entry. They would then be stored in climate-controlled buildings within range of US military bases and deployed when needed for military operations. Such weapons, Fisher said, would “offer China’s leadership a wide array of options.”

He said such weapons could involve “using larger container ships, thousands of fishing ships or stored containers in ports, to undertake military or terror mission strikes in a manner that can be denied if desired.”

“The CCP [Chinese Communist Party] is fully capable of using containerized missiles to sow chaos when desired,” Fisher claims.

One such scenario, he said would be placing Chinese missile launching containers near the Port of Seattle, for example. The Chinese would use those missiles to deploy EMP warhead-armed missiles over a nearby nuclear ballistic submarine base, Fisher suggested.

“The EMP blast might take out electronics on the [submarines] and all over the base without having to launch a nuclear missile from China,” he said.

Law Enforcement Today recently published a story about the significant threat EMPs pose to our country.

“Washington would be in chaos, would not know against whom to retaliate, and perhaps China uses American distraction to begin its real objective, the military conquest of Taiwan.”

It is likely however that under such a scenario, Taiwan would appear to be “small fish” to Beijing. Such an EMP blast would bring the west coast of the United States to its collective knees.

US officials believe that weapons so-deployed under a container deployment system scenario are an advanced anti-ship missile called the YJ-18C, a version of the Russian Club-K weapon.

The missiles would fit into a standard 8×8.5×20 or 40 foot long standard shipping container.

The Sun addressed an online animation which showed how that weapon could be fitted into a container, and shows how the top of the container comes off to reveal the missile, with the front dropping down for the guidance system.

The missile, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, has a speed up to Mach 3—three times the speed of sound or 2,300 mph.

While these missiles are not on part with China’s hypersonic missiles noted earlier, which can reach speeds of Mach 10, the Club-K is still capable of “packing a punch,” analysts say.

The only record of such a missile being fired from a container ship was accomplished by Israel as part of a test.

China possibly having such a weapon available for deployment presents enormous problems to the United States, with large numbers (typically, but not recently) entering US ports on both the west and east coasts, putting them potentially in range of a majority of US major cities as well as the US fleet.

“If this capability is confirmed, it will require a completely new screening regime for all PRC flagged commercial ships bound for U.S. ports,” Fanell said.

After unleashing the coronavirus on the world, China has become more aggressive in a status battle as the world comes out of the pandemic. Beijing is also flexing its muscles as it saber rattles around the globe, having recently moved from the Pacific to the Atlantic by establishing naval bases on the west coast of Africa.

The first such base on the African continent was build many years ago in Dijbouti on the Horn of Africa, and it has been steadily working to increase its capacity.

They are also believed to be working to establish a navy base in Tanzania, located on Africa’s east coast and a country which has had a long-standing military relationship with the communist nation.

The recent deployment of the hypersonic missile marked a new and concerning chapter in Beijing’s ramping up of military might.

Those missiles represent a significant threat to China’s enemies and in particular the United States because they don’t fly into the upper atmosphere before coming back to earth in steep trajectories; instead, they fly at lower altitudes and are less susceptible to being shot down by anti-missile weapons.

China, as well as Russia are believed to have significantly advanced their hypersonic missile program, even as the United States military concerns itself with proper pronouns, diversity and drag queen story hour.

As mentioned above, US military officials were reportedly “stunned” after China launched the hypersonic glide vehicle from a rocket deployed in space, which reportedly circled the globe before speeding toward its target.

That launch certainly caught the attention of the Pentagon, which heretofore didn’t know Beijing had the capability to deploy such a missile.

Now they have our attention; hopefully, it isn’t too late.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

For more on the Chinese launch of the hypersonic missile, we invite you to:


BEIJING, CHINA- Sleep well, America. While China is actively testing hypersonic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, the American military leadership is examining so-called “white rage” and engaging in woke ideological indoctrination of military members in critical race theory and sexual deviance. Meanwhile, our nuclear capability utilizes primarily 40-year-old technology.



The New York Post reports that in August, the Chinese Communist regime tested a hypersonic missile which actually circled the globe prior to seeking out its target, citing a report in the Financial Times.

Five people familiar with the testing explained how this was accomplished, saying “the Chinese military launched a rocket that carried a hypersonic glide vehicle which flew through low-orbit space” prior to acquiring and heading toward its intended target.

Three people briefed on the intelligence say the missile missed its target by approximately 24 miles. However despite that, the test shows that China’s capability using hypersonic weapons is much more advanced than officials in the United States realized.

Some wonder how this was missed by United States intelligence and to what extent they have underestimated Chinese military advancement and modernization.

“We have no idea how they did this,” one official said.

The Post said that the U.S. and Russia, as well as China have been working on hypersonic weapons, with Russia having tested one such missile in July.

The United States, when it isn’t indoctrinating military members, plans on outfitting Navy destroyers with such missiles, which are capable of traveling five times faster than the speed of sound.

While that is somewhat slower than existing ballistic missiles, the difference is hypersonic missiles are capable of being controlled after launch, thus making it easier to circumvent defense systems.

The Pentagon refused to comment specifically on the Financial Times report.

“We have made clear our concerns about the military capabilities China continues to pursue, capabilities that only increase tensions in the region and beyond,” said feckless Defense Department spokesman John Kirby to the Times. “That is one reason why we hold China as our number one pacing challenge.”

According to Taylor Fravel, an expert on Chinese nuclear weapons policy, who was unaware of the August test, noted a such a weapon utilizing a hypersonic glide vehicle could in fact “negate” US missile defense systems, designed to target and destroy incoming ballistic missiles.

“Hypersonic glide vehicles…fly at lower trajectories and can maneuver in flight, which makes them hard to track and destroy,” said Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Times of Israel noted that standard ballistic missiles fly higher up into space in an arc to reach their target, however hypersonic missiles fly in a lower trajectory in the atmosphere, which would potentially allow them to reach their target quicker.

He also said it would prove “destabilizing” if China was able to fully develop and deploy such a weapon. He noted that despite the fact Beijing had assessed the weapon, it didn’t necessarily indicate they would deploy the capability.

All of this comes about as tensions between the United States and China have risen relative to Chinese saber rattling with Taiwan.

Michael Gallagher, minority member of the House Armed Services Committee, said the test by China should “serve as a call to action.”

“The People’s Liberation Army now has an increasingly credible capability to undermine our missile defenses and threaten the American homeland with both conventional and nuclear strikes,” said Gallagher. “Even more disturbing is the fact that American technology has contributed to the PLA’s hypersonic missile program.”

China, which is not currently bound by any type of arms-control deal and which appears unwilling to do so has begun posing a more significant threat to the free world.

Fears increased over the past few months, with US military officials warning about China’s growing nuclear capability. These fears increased after satellite imagery showed China was constructing over 200 intercontinental missile silos.

While currently US missile defense systems are focused on threats coming over the North Pole, two people familiar with the Chinese program said that country’s weapon could in theory fly over the South Pole.

According to Hu Xijin of Global Times, a Chinese state-run media outlet, he tweeted China was improving it’s nuclear deterrence “to ensure that the US abandons the idea of nuclear blackmail against China.”

Although the Chinese military declined to specifically comment on the test, Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson said China has always pursued a military policy that was “defensive in nature,” and said their military development wasn’t directed toward any specific country.

“We don’t have a global strategy and plans of military operations like the US does. And we are not at all interested in having an arms race with other countries,’ Liu said.

“In contrast, the US has in recent years been fabricating excuses like ‘the China threat’ to justify its arms expansions and development of hypersonic weapons. This has directly intensified arms race in this category and severely undermined global strategic stability.”

While China typically is transparent about launching what are called “Long March” rockets—the type used to launch the hypersonic glide vehicle into orbit—but conspicuously concealed the August launch.

Financial Times said that the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology announced on July 19 on an official social media account that it had launched a Long March 2C rocket, adding that was the 77th launch of that rocket. The next month, on August 24th they noted the 79th flight. Conspicuously missing was an announcement of the 78th launch, raising speculation of a secret launch.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

In July, Law Enforcement Today reported on a watchdog report showing the United States Navy was more concerned with pushing woke ideology than preparing itself for future conflict. In case you missed it, here’s that story:


WASHINGTON, DC- While US Chief of Naval Operations Michael Gilday concerns himself with touting Marxist ideology in the form of critical race theory, a new watchdog report paints a disturbing picture of the readiness of what (at least at one time) was the most powerful naval force in the world.

The Washington Free Beacon reports that a number of sailors, speaking anonymously complained that vital training time is being wasted on (the above) identity politics and insufficient Congressional funding.

For example, Congress, now under Democrat control as well as the Biden administration has sharply cut shipbuilding and weapons procurement in the 2022 defense budget, which will be a setback to Trump administration plans to build toward a 350 to 500 ship US Navy.

The whistleblowers told investigators that the Navy’s operations are “increasingly toxic and narrowly focused on office politics,” the Beacon reported, while ignoring the increasing threat from communist China. The respondents complained that diversity trainings and other non-combat-related activities take up significant portions of the workday which they say should otherwise be spent on combat readiness.

“Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we’ll survive a fight with the Chinese Navy,” said one unnamed active lieutenant cited in the report.

Moreover, this complaint came from a black woman.

“It’s criminal. They think my only value is as a black woman. But you cut our ship open with a missile and we’ll all bleed the same color” she said.

According to The Western Journal, the report was commissioned by Republican members of Congress and was released earlier this week.

The report, titled “The Fighting Culture of the United States Surface Fleet” was prepared by two retired members of the Navy, Marine Lt. Gen. Robert Schmidle and Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery.

The report discovered readiness skills in the fleet have degraded due to an “obsessive focus” on diversity as well as thin resources.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Reps. Jim Banks (R-IN), Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and Mike Gallagher (R-WI) commissioned the report. All four members served in the armed forces.

The four commissioned the report after several high-profile issues came about regarding the Navy’s surface fleet, which included an incident five years ago when two small amphibious craft were temporarily surrendered to Iran in the Persian Gulf.

There was also the issue of ship collisions in the South China Sea and off the coast of Japan in 2017, as well as a 2020 fire aboard the USS Bonhomme Richard, a light amphibious carrier that was moored at the US Naval Base in San Diego. That fire led to the ship being scuttled.

The report was the result of some 77 interview with both current and former officers in the Navy. There were a number of aspects of the Navy’s culture which was slammed, however the rise of “wokeness” was one of the most glaring. Ironically, that culture was in place prior to Biden taking office in January.

One recently retired leader summed it up, saying, “I guarantee you, every unit in the Navy is up to speed on their diversity training. I’m sorry that I can’t say the same of their ship handling training.”

Many of those responding complained about such “nonessential training.”

“While programs to encourage diversity, human sex trafficking, suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention, and others are appropriate, they come with a cost,” it states.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

“The non-combat curricula consume Navy resources, clog inboxes, create administrative quagmires, and monopolize precious training time. By weighing down sailors with non-combat related training and administrative burdens, both Congress and Navy leaders risk sending them into battle less prepared and less focused than their opponents.

“Sailors increasingly see administrative and non-combat related training as the mission, rather than mission itself.”  

Montgomery told the Beacon that the Navy should be more focused on matching the Chinese navy’s expansion plans. He contrasted the Navy’s current priorities with his own experience during the Cold War.

“The surface warfare community definitely suffers from the lack of investment,” he said. “A large position of the respondents to this think there wasn’t the commitment to warfighting that one would expect from a Navy that can now see a potential adversary on the horizon.”

A spokeswoman for the Department of the Navy, Patricia Kreuzberger told the Free Beacon the branch “welcomes” many of the report’s findings.

“We look forward to continuing our work with Congress to ensure we have the most capable ships crewed by the most capable Sailors, as well as a surface force that is fit for the challenges of the 21st century,” Kreuzberger said.

Meanwhile, Brent Sadler, a former surface warfare officer and a fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said the onslaught of politics within the ranks of the Navy should encourage senior officers to be more detailed when discussing racial and cultural issues.

“When it comes to actual racism and discrimination in the Navy, they need to speak with facts,” Sadler said. “The flag officers need to base their response and prioritization on facts when these political and social issues come into the Navy.”

The Western Journal quoted another captain in the report, a former destroyer commander who said, “where someone puts their time shows what their priorities are.”

“And we’ve got so many messages about X, Y, Z appreciation month or sexual assault prevention, or you name it…we don’t even have close to that same level of emphasis on actual warfighting.”

That lack of warfighting focus is one of the more worrisome findings of the paper.

“There’s no curriculum,” said one former active-duty officer, now in the reserve.

“We’ll spend hours and hours on drill weekends or other areas talking about like, ‘OK, what’s the checklist you have in place? Do you have all your right uniforms?’ but there is no training like, ‘what is the current situation in China?’

“What are the things the Chinese are concerned about? What are the things the Iranians are concerned about? [The] Intel folks know that, but like, there’s no general education about, ‘What are the wars we could fight, and how do we understand the context of these, so we get in combat.’

“We can have both the cultural and political understanding as well as the warfighting implications. And to me, if we’re focused on the front-line warfighting, we should know the worst we’re going into and what the greater context is. There’s none of that right now.”

One observation, however appeared to be the most worrisome.

“I don’t think that the [surface community] see themselves as people who are engaged in a fight,” said a junior active-duty surface warfare officer.

Other areas that were criticized include micromanagement and a “bureaucratic, risk-averse culture,” as well as the Navy’s maintenance program; Navy commanders were also seen as being too focused on avoiding bad publicity in the media.

The conclusions of the report were damning.

“With China putting dozens of fighting warships in the water on an annual basis, the lack of proper focus on warfighting was of deep concern to many interviewees,” the report states.

“I’ve never heard anyone in any [congressional] testimony that I can think of that talks about actually winning,” said a career surface warfare officer in the report. “And so that’s not to absolve the Navy of its responsibility, but it’s just stunning to me.”

After the report was released, Sen. Tom Cotton expressed concern over the findings, issuing a statement on Monday:

“The findings of this report are very concerning. Our sailors are too often deprived of the training and leadership they need to fight and win at sea,” Cotton wrote.

“A navy that puts lethality, warfighting, and operational excellence at the heart of its culture is absolutely essential to our national security. America counts on the Navy to keep us safe and keep our seas open.”

Rep. Crenshaw, a former Navy SEAL who lost one eye in combat in Afghanistan echoed Cotton’s statement.

“A strong Navy is critical to our national security interests around the world,” Crenshaw said in the release. “The findings clearly indicate that our sailors are not receiving the training they need to perform the essential functions of the Navy: To find and sink enemy fleets and ensure freedom of navigation.”

The report runs counter to the narrative being put forth by Gilday and the Biden administration, who claim that diversity training and critical race theory, which is a Marxist ideology, somehow strengthens the service while claiming no readiness has been lost by the military’s recent focus on wokeness.

Perhaps the most chilling part of the report was the final line.

“Unless changes are made, the Navy risks losing the next major conflict.”

If that happens, we all lose. But hey, at least the Navy will be diverse. That will impress the Chinese.

Editor note: In 2020, we saw a nationwide push to “defund the police”.  While we all stood here shaking our heads wondering if these people were serious… they cut billions of dollars in funding for police officers.  And as a result, crime has skyrocketed – all while the same politicians who said “you don’t need guns, the government will protect you” continued their attacks on both our police officers and our Second Amendment rights.

And that’s exactly why we’re launching this national crowdfunding campaign as part of our efforts to help “re-fund the police”.

For those looking for a quick link to get in the fight and support the cause, click here.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Submit a Correction
Related Posts