NSSF: Another unconstitutional and unnecessary gun control bill was quietly just introduced in Congress

Share:

By Larry Keane and our friends at NSSF

There they go again. Antigun Democrats introduced legislation to force Americans to lock up their firearms in their homes. It’s another one-size-fits-all mandate from the government. The U.S. Constitution would like a word.

U.S. Rep. Donald McEachin (D-Va.) is no stranger to gun control.

He’s backed nearly every antigun bill introduced in Congress. He believes in gun control so much, he suggested in 2019 that Virginia’s Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam call out the Virginia National Guard to enforce strict gun control measures in the Old Dominion.

His comments drew a rare public rebuke from the Virginia National Guard, which brushed back the congressman.

“We understand and respect the passion people feel for the U.S. Constitution and 2nd Amendment rights,” tweeted Virginia’s National Guard on their official account. “We will not speculate about the possible use of the Virginia National Guard.”

Even his hometown paper The Roanoke Times editorialized he overreached.”

Fast forward and Rep. McEachin introduced H.R. 4836, the Firearm Owners Responsibility and Safety Act.

The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Heller in 2008 that Washington, D.C.’s, mandatory storage requirement for firearms while in the home violated the U.S. Constitution doesn’t seem to matter to Rep. McEachin.

In a Congress controlled by gun control Democrats in both chambers, Rep. McEachin’s bill has yet to gain a cosponsor.

Trojan Horse Gun Control

Looks can be deceiving and Rep. McEachin may be using his safe storage bill as an end around on the entire lawful firearm industry.

Buried in his bill, Rep. McEachin included provisions to partially repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).

The PLCAA is bipartisan legislation that protects the gun industry from frivolous lawsuits for the criminal actions of non-affiliated third parties who use firearms to commit crimes. In a press release, Rep. McEachin included quotes from two of the PLCAA’s biggest opponents.

Brady President Kris Brown said, “The Firearm Owners Responsibility and Safety Act will save lives, tackling gun violence in many forms by…removing unprecedented protections for the gun industry.”

Linda Lipsen, CEO of the American Association for Justice, added, “For too long, the gun industry has been provided unparalleled civil liability immunity.”

Their claims are false and used as an attempt to mislead Americans into supporting faulty gun control schemes.

Hillary Clinton said the firearm industry was “wholly protected from any kind of liability,” in 2015 and it was false then. President Joe Biden made the claim too, both as a presidential candidate and later from the White House Rose Garden.

Media, including The Washington Post, CNN and PolitiFact, raked his claim over the coals. Even disgraced Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo claimed the “only industry in the United States of America immune from lawsuits are the gun manufacturers.” PolitiFact said the governor was caught in a lie.

Report: Biden’s proposed gun control strategy for combating violent crime has no real scientific data to back it up

WASHINGTON, D.C.- In a recent article from The Washington Times, some experts caution that as it stands, there is not enough evidence to support the notion that President Joe Biden’s plan to combat gun violence was constructed using factual data. 

Biden’s plan to combat the rising spike in violent crime includes targeting licensed gun dealers who break laws, creating strike forces to stop firearms trafficking, and giving more funds to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

The president claims that the three-pronged strategy will save lives, but he has yet to offer any actual metrics on how much his new gun policies will reduce gun deaths. Since 1995, the Rand Corporation, a non-profit think tank, has analyzed thousands of studies on gun police research.

In a report released in 2020, researchers concluded that there was a limited base of scientific evidence on the effects of commonly discussed gun policies.

Among the thousands of studies researchers reviewed, only 123 studies conducted since 1995 were found to have met “high standards” for evidence. The nonprofit did not find a connection between mass shootings and gun dealer misconduct and it provided mixed results on Biden’s other violent-crime reduction proposals.

Additionally, a review of studies on the impact of transferring firearms to a person prohibited on violent crime was also inconclusive.

Rand did state that the studies found that complying with background checks has a moderate impact on violent crime. Andrew Moral, one of the report’s authors said in a statement:

“I want to be clear that moderate or inconclusive evidence doesn’t mean that a gun law is not effective. It means the research, in many cases, hasn’t been done. This is not a field that has a lot of research and in many cases, the research is very weak.”

The gun control group Everytown For Gun Safety claims that its research backs the plan. In a study last year, Everytown found that an estimated 84,380 guns were used in a crime within three years of its first retail purchase.

That same study found that 82 percent of trafficked guns came from states without background check laws. However, Derek Cohen, vice president at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, countered Everytown’s data claim.

He said that the data is skewed because it includes guns legally purchased, but later stolen from a house or car. He stated that Everytown has its own gun control agenda and added:

“It’s a confirmation bias because crime guns are typically the ones stolen from law-abiding citizens, not the ones legally purchases.”

Outside of scientific studies, Cohen said that anecdotal evidence shows that few dealers are connected to gun crimes. He said:

“You could have a pawnbroker that doesn’t adhere to the rules, but I’ve looked at this space for the last 20 years and if the primary focus of a business is selling guns, just because of the licensing requirements, dealers are crossing every T and dotting every I.”

Betsy Brantner Smith, a spokeswoman for the National Police Association, said that the White House administration is trying to distract from the mayhem in cities by focusing on “process crimes,” which are minor offenses such as falsifying firearms transaction records or failing to run a background check. She added:

“When we look at violent crime, most of the offenders did not go to a federal firearm licensed dealer, fill out all of the paperwork, legally purchase a gun, and then go commit a violent crime. That’s such a silly, childish notion. That is not how most of the violent offenders are obtaining their weapons right now.”

Brantner Smith called on law-enforcement groups to conduct their own research. She said:

“We need to show the American people what we are doing, who we are arresting, and what is happening to them as they go through the system. One thing the American public really needs to know is how our system works. Let’s show them and let’s let law enforcement spearhead this.”

Cohen stated that he believes there will be a reduction in crime in the fall, but that it will naturally occur as the colder weather forces people to return indoors. Brantner Smith disagreed by saying she does not expect crime to drop at all, adding that the Biden administration needs to focus on tougher sentences for criminals. She said:

“A year from now, the data that we are going to see is that going after rogue gun dealers will do nothing because that’s not where this problem comes from.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

California gun control: Violent gun crime and mass shootings surge in Los Angeles county despite tough gun laws

June 5th, 2021

LOS ANGELES, CA – Gun control advocates may be in for a surprise after learning that Los Angeles County, with some of the most stringent gun controls in the nation, is experiencing a violent crime surge.

L.A. County Sheriff Alex Villanueva released a video on social media announcing numbers showing a 95 percent increase in murders, a 40 percent increase in grand theft auto, a 7.8 percent increase in rape, a 12.9 percent increase in aggravated assault, and a 22 percent increase in arson.

The Sheriff said the LA County crime statistics were “not good news”:

“All (increases are) huge numbers. Very troublesome and I am going to identify this as existential threat number one, particularly for people who live in communities that have a large percentage of African American and Latino residents. They are the ones in the impact zone.”

The Sheriff then blasted council members for not taking action to address the rapid crime increase, and suggested they were partially to blame:

“I have yet to hear a single motion from the Board of Supervisors addressing this, not one. On another note, related because we have less cops on the street (and) more crooks, less consequences, what could go wrong with that combination, right?”

In the same video, the Sheriff announced that his department would increase the processing and number of concealed weapons permits issued to the public so that they could protect themselves from the criminals running rampant.

L.A. County, and all of California, has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country. Gun control monitoring site maintained by Giffords Law Center gave California an “A” for gun control saying:

“California has the strongest gun laws in the United States and often leads the way in enacting new approaches to gun safety. The state has the seventh-lowest gun death rate in the country.

“To further strengthen its gun laws, California should increase funding for community violence prevention programs and strengthen firearm removal processes for people subject to court protective orders.”

California gun laws include red flag law, universal background checks, a 10-day waiting period on firearm purchases, firearm registration requirements, an “assault weapons” ban, a limit on the number of guns a law-abiding citizen can purchase in a month, a “good cause” requirement for concealed carry permit issuance, a ban on K-12 teachers being armed for classroom defense, a ban on campus carry for self-defense, and numerous other controls.

As of 2020, California had more gun laws on the books than any other state. As of that year, there were 107 gun laws restricting the possession and carrying of firearms.

Despite these laws restricting the Second Amendment, crime in the streets of cities like Los Angeles and Oakland rages.

May 26, the mass shooting at the VTA rail yard in San Jose became the 18th mass shooting in California this year, according to the Gun Violence Archive. Nine people died in the San Jose attack.

Mass shootings in California, with the gun control laws, are not a rare occurrence. Before the May 26 attack, two mass shootings occurred on May 18. There were seven in the Month of May alone.

From January through May 26, Oakland had four mass shootings.

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) claims that the violence his own L.A. County Sheriff tells him is running out of control is not a sign that gun control is not working. Three days after the tragic attack in San Jose, he tweeted:

“Some people (…meaning the GOP and NRA) like to point to horrific shootings like yesterday’s and say CA’s strict gun laws don’t work. The reality is that is simply not true.”

He tried to support his argument by using statistics from 1993 and spoke about the “rate” of gun deaths rather than discuss the number of deaths from gun violence:

“In 1993, CA had the 3rd highest rate of gun homicides in the country and the 16th highest rate of gun deaths overall.”

“Since then, CA has become a national leader on gun safety.”

In another blow to gun control in California, a federal judge has overturned California’s three-decade-old ban on assault weapons this week.

In a 94-page decision, federal Judge Roger T. Benitez described California’s assault weapons ban – in place in 1989 – as unconstitutional and defended the right of Americans to own semi-automatic rifles.

The judge wrote:

“Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment.

“Guns and ammunition in the hands of criminals, tyrants and terrorists are dangerous; guns in the hands of law-abiding responsible citizens are better.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity
LA County Sheriff expands concealed weapons permits as police defunded and region sees 95% rise in homicides

June 3, 2021

 

Los Angeles, CA – The Los Angeles County Sheriff announced Wednesday that his department is expanding the number of approved concealed weapons permits as the region suffers rampant violent crime and a 95% rise in homicides.

In May, the county experienced a 95% increase in murder, 7% increase in rape, a 13% uptick in aggravated assaults, a 40% rise in grand theft auto, and a 22% increase in arson incidents, compared to the same time frame in 2020, Sheriff Alex Villanueva said in a video posted to Instagram and YouTube.

The Sheriff said the LA County crime statistics were “not good news”:

“All (increases are) huge numbers. Very troublesome and I am going to identify this as existential threat number one, particularly for people who live in communities that have a large percentage of African American and Latino residents. They are the ones in the impact zone.”

The Sheriff then blasted council members for not taking action to address the rapid crime increase, and suggested they were partially to blame:

“I have yet to hear a single motion from the Board of Supervisors addressing this, not one. On another note, related because we have less cops on the street (and) more crooks, less consequences, what could go wrong with that combination, right?”

The Sheriff was commenting about steps taken by LA County to defund the police department, including the November 2020 “Reimagine LA County” measure passed by the council that cut $145.5 million from the Sheriff’s Department budget and $49.1 million from the probation department. 

There is another cut of $143 million pending.

 

The council reversed the decision after crime spiraled out of control and voted in March to increase the Sheriff’s Department funding by $36 million, still leaving a deficit of $13.1 million. The additional cut is pending for the next fiscal year.

The County’s “care first, jail last” philosophy resulting in penalties and sentences for criminals being reduced as part of calls by Democratic leaders for justice reform, coupled with the budget cuts, has fed the crime rise, according to the Sheriff.

Villanueva announced that The Sheriff’s Department is accelerating the issuance of concealed weapons permits (CCW) in consideration of the increased crime threat to residence:

“We have made the ‘Good Cause’ standard achievable. We are recognizing the threat to residents is increasing, so we are responding accordingly.

“We are not going to the ‘shall issue’ where anyone who can fog a mirror can get a CCW permit, that’s not responsible.

“But we do want give the opportunity to the people who are responsible, pass the training, don’t have any convictions or legal limitations from being armed in public, and can establish just a good cause reason they should be armed.”

The Sheriff did not hold back his anger as he called out the actions of the LA County Board, pointing out that the Sheriff’s Department was defunded the $145 million dollars and cut by 1,310 positions. The Sheriff said the Board did not “feel that was enough,” and was now planning to cut $143 million and 77 positions:

“Considering those two things combined with a deficient of $101 million inherited when I took office at the end of 2018…

“We have been defunded, degraded our capacity to fight crime and investigate crime and hold people accountable when they commit a crime. All of that is going downhill, and not to the benefit of the residents of L.A. County. As you can judge, (the numbers) are going in the wrong direction.”

He spoke out against the Board’s support for “Measure J,” a referendum that passed in 2020 to provide “alternatives to incarceration” and fight “racial injustice” through 10% of the country’s budget:

“We have members of the Board of Supervisors who decided they wanted to ‘seize the moment’ and put Measure J on the ballot without it being vetted legally, without it actually being put to the test by having the people gather their signatures in the truly democratic way to see what the level of support is.  And then you put it with a deceptive title that somehow, we were going to reimagine things.

“Part of that reimagine, people never realized, was defunding the Sheriff’s Department. That was the biggest piece that was glossed over, intentionally, by the advocates who wrote this deceptive measure and the members of the Board of Supervisors who put it on the ballot. So, the four of you that voted for this, you own it now.” 

 

 


Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost. 

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
 
Facebook Follow First
Share:
Related Posts