This is an editorial submitted by a retired California Homicide Detective.
Law Enforcement in the United States today faces more challenges than ever before. In some circles, the word Police has become a symbol of racism, hatred, deception and many other unfair categorizations.
Most recently it has come under deadly attacks and has become the whipping boy for politicians and other self- serving groups to constantly attack, while failing to look at both sides of the issue.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of the dedicated and decent men and women in law enforcement who risk their lives every day are not recognized, only those that “fail” in the poll of public opinion.
Those who choose to serve in law enforcement, much like the military, do so out of a core belief that protecting our constitutional rights is a very worthwhile endeavor.
I’ve never spoken with anyone in law enforcement who entered the profession to gain notoriety; rather it was the fundamental belief they were doing something inherently good.
Police Administrations across the country need to recognize that while we currently face more challenges than ever before, it is also a golden opportunity to begin doing things better than they have ever been done before.
Our front line personnel are under siege from many angles and need the support of their administrations/command staffs more than ever.
The most recognizable and easiest form of support is not allowing the media to dictate the pace and course of an Officer Involved Shooting (OIS).
Recently, administrators are so quick to be politically correct that they make ridiculous statements soon after the incident. These statements are made to soothe the media and, in reality, usually have nothing to do with the actual facts of the case.
How many current Command Staff personnel have actually investigated an OIS? Those that have that experience know that a thorough investigation takes time and can’t be captured by the viral videos or tweets of today’s media.
Address the issue initially as soon as logistically possible, then schedule updates. It might not satisfy the “have to have it now” attitude that is so prevalent in today’s society, but Command should be more concerned with the officer than the media.
There are a few things to remember with an OIS or in custody death. First, the officer has just been through a traumatic event. Take care of him or her immediately. The suspect’s family, friends, attorney and the media were not there and are not your concern.
Your officer is, and should always be, your primary concern. Yes, the other groups need to be addressed, but they can all wait.
As John Wooden always preached, “Be quick but don’t hurry.”
Make sure your officer is provided legal representation, post traumatic incident counseling and a fair, thorough investigation of the incident. They all deserve that and you owe it to them.
They are asked to make full speed decisions without the luxury of a command staff group debate. As an administrator, don’t forget the difficulty of making those decisions on a daily basis. Remember, you couldn’t be part of the administration without your front line personnel.
Simply put, you can’t coach without players.
Most departments have some form of union/association that provides legal representation for them. Make sure part of your OIS policy is that the officers are able to contact them as soon as practical after an OIS, and that your department welcomes their assistance.
Legal representation should be able to respond to the scene and immediately speak with the officer after a public safety statement is given. They should be part of the interview of the officer and able to communicate with the investigating officers as the investigation moves forward.
On any traumatic incident, but especially an OIS, proper counseling is critical. If your department does not have an in house peer support team or licensed psychiatric support available, go outside for help.
These are your people and there is nothing more valuable to any department than it’s men and women. Everyone deals with traumatic incidents in a different way. There’s no perfect formula for predicting a return date to work but at a minimum they should be seen by a licensed therapist before returning.
A better policy would be allowing your officers to contact their therapist of choice at any time afterwards with no negative repercussions. You’re making a 20-30 year investment in these people. Make sure they have the support and care they need to successfully complete their careers.
Ensure the investigation is fair and thorough. Utilize all available avenues. If it’s necessary to go outside your organization for that process, then do so. Smaller agencies shouldn’t be afraid to ask for help from agencies with more resources or expertise. Facts are facts: Whether investigated at the municipal, state or federal level, they don’t change.
A complete, thorough, fact based investigation is critical. Social media comments, suggestions or opinions have no place in these investigations.
Ensuring your officers’ actions will only be judged by department policy and the penal code sends a strong message to your officers that your first priority is their well-being and obviously that they acted under the law.
If the officers were not justified during the incident, it’s critical to find out why. Was it from a lack of training, poor equipment, bad decision making or was it criminal intent?
If it was lack of training or poor equipment then they need to be supported and trained in the proper procedures because they are ultimately a reflection of the administration and what it provides their officers. Look at any successful sports franchise and you will always find the players are given the best resources in order to compete.
If it was poor decision making, then their thought process has to be examined. Was it a lack of training or do they just not possess the necessary skills to make the full speed decisions law enforcement officers are required to make?
If they don’t they need to be replaced. This is best for both parties as it will help keep any future civil litigation at a minimum and allow the officer to pursue a career where they don’t have to make decisions on a daily basis that could cost them their lives.
This path may initially sound harsh, but in the end, it is ultimately supporting the officer.
If it was criminal intent then the officer needs to be removed and treated according to the laws of the state and whatever departmental policies are in place. There is no room in any department for criminal activity at any level.
In recent years, we have seen prosecutions range from patrol officers in rural communities to the Sheriff and Under Sheriff of Los Angeles County. It’s not a popular topic but all those individuals involved made their own decisions and were made to deal with the consequences after being lawfully prosecuted.
Support after traumatic incidents remains the responsibility of any department’s administration and a fair, thorough investigation of any incident should always be conducted. If this policy is followed all officers involved will benefit and ultimately so will the department and the public they serve.
Written by Rick Carr. Rick is a retired Homicide Sergeant from the Torrance, California Police Department with 31 years of service. In addition to his law enforcement career, he served as the Football Team Security Director at the University of Southern California and was appointed as the nation’s first Director of Athletic Security.
He believes sports and law enforcement have many similarities and both groups can benefit from examining each other.
Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.
Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!