Activists ignore facts and footage, demand officers be fired for defending their own lives

Share:

There is a sector of society that wants to see our officers fired, imprisoned or killed. Their offense? Doing their jobs.

A Minnesota police officer was attacked by a man with a knife. The officer attempted to retreat, shouting verbal orders that the assailant refused to follow. The cop shot and killed him.

 

Activists ignore facts and footage, demand officers be fired for defending their own lives
A screenshot from the St. Paul officer’s body cam shows Ronald Davis attacking him with a knife. (St. Paul PD)

 

The St. Paul Police Department released the minute-long body camera clip of the Sept. 15 confrontation that led to the death of 31-year-old Ronald Davis. The video shows that Mattson acted reasonably in self-defense. Chief Todd Axtell says Mattson had no choice but to defend himself.

Case closed? Not for area activists, who say that they are not satisfied with the footage that has been released. The Anti-Police Brutality Coalition says it’s not clear from the limited video whether Mattson could have used non-lethal force. The group calls for all the body-camera video to be released, as well as all investigative materials.

Activists ignore facts and footage, demand officers be fired for defending their own lives
Davis charges at the officer with a grimace on his face moments before the fatal shots were fired. (St. Paul PD)

Right after the shooting, protesters took the streets demanding justice for the ‘victim’.

The body cam video is frightening and shows firsthand how quickly a situation can turn into a fight for an officer to stay alive.

You can watch the fatal shooting below. Viewer discretion is strongly advised.

As soon as Officer Mattson stepped foot outside of his cruiser, he was already being attacked.

The video shows the suspect charging at Mattson with his right arm held above his head, brandishing a knife. Mattson has almost no time to react.

But incredibly, he does. Officer Mattson immediately springs out of his vehicle and screams in surprise. As he tries to escape the knife-wielding suspect, he falls to the ground. 

He screams again, swearing.

As he goes down, the officer’s flashlight fell from his belt. Davis reportedly picked it up, continuing to come at Mattson with the knife in one hand and the officer’s flashlight in the other.

Amazingly Mattson is able to climb back onto his feet, draws his weapons and screams at Davis to stop his attack.

“Get away from me! Drop the knife! Drop the (expletive) knife! Drop the knife!” the officer can be heard shouting before finally pulling the trigger and shooting Davis multiple times. 

Davis can be seen falling to the ground as Mattson runs to take cover behind his squad car. He frantically radios for backup.

Records showed that only about 12 seconds had passed from the time Davis came sprinting at Mattson with a knife to when Mattson pulled the trigger… but as you watch the video, it seems like a lifetime.

Did you know that Law Enforcement Today has a private new home for those who support emergency responders and veterans?  It’s called LET Unity, and it’s where we share the untold stories of those patriotic Americans.  Every penny gets reinvested into giving these heroes a voice.  Check it out today.

Activists ignore facts and footage, demand officers be fired for defending their own lives

 

12 seconds. That’s all that stood between life and death for the Minnesota officer. Davis was pronounced dead at the scene. 

Immediately after the shooting, before the body cam footage had been released, anti-police protesters began condemning the officer, taking to the streets to demand ‘justice’ for Ronald Davis, whom they said was a victim of racial profiling.

They say that Davis wasn’t aggressive and couldn’t have possibly been a threat.

“It’s disgusting that the people who are supposed to protect us are out here killing us,” said one protester. “When I heard the news, I was shocked because he was a very respectful, kind person. He would say, ‘Yes, sir; yes, ma’am. He wasn’t an aggressive person, even though he was big.”

Another said the officer should be terminated immediately.

“When you shoot that gun, when that cop shoots that gun, they shouldn’t have a job anymore. It shouldn’t be a paid vacation with administrative leave.”

We hope that every single protester out there sees this video and knows the truth about what kind of person Davis was. 

“He really was a gentle soul and a wonderful person, not a person who would act in the character as the Saint Paul police have described him. We know the St. Paul police are the deadliest police department in the state,” said another.

St. Paul authorities say they are willing to take responsibility when they get it wrong… but this was absolutely not one of those instances. 

“While I recognize the trauma that has been caused by a history of policing practices throughout our country that have disproportionately affected communities of color, I also cannot stand by — I simply can’t sleep at night — knowing that a good officer, and all of our officers, are being assailed by people who don’t have the facts,” said St. Paul Police Chief Todd Axtell.

He says the department has “a proven record of taking responsibility,” but said, “This is not one of those times.”

Axtell showed the footage to Davis’s mother before releasing it to the public.

And before we believe that this is isolated to St. Paul, the same thing is happening in Chicago.

In July of last year, we published the story of an officer involved shooting in Chicago. Harith Augustus was shot and killed while trying to flee. It was not the act of fleeing that resulted in his death. It was the fact that he was known to be armed and the officers involved believed he was attempting to draw his weapon.

Now, more than a year later, a collaborative group is trying to create a narrative that paints the Chicago Police Department as liars and its officers as racists and murderers.

Just how might they be able to prove this you ask. They can’t.

They are simply making statements and portraying them as true. They provide no credible evidence to support their thesis. And they are using architectural design software to build their case.

In a piece run by The Interceptor earlier this week, two groups are highlighted for the anti-police narrative being reported.

The article states that Forensic Architecture and Invisible Institute have collaborated on a project that excavates this carefully crafted formulation in search of the truth of what happened on 71st Street that day. By means of new forensic techniques and on-the-ground reporting, our counter-investigation contests the official police narrative and examines the process by which that narrative was constructed.

Their only evidence? A dash cam video that shows only two to three seconds of video that was captured with Augustus and CPD Officer Halley.

In this video, was see Augustus run past the patrol car and into the street and the officer following him with gun drawn. They use that small clip to refute police claims. They said he was fleeing and had no weapon. Thus, they conclude, the police are lying, and Augustus was murdered in cold blood.

As reported in Law Enforcement Today, footage from body cameras and other surveillance video showed that Augustus was not only armed with a handgun but reached for it as he resisted officers who confronted him, officials said Sunday.

Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said that the 37-year old, had a holstered semiautomatic handgun (and what appeared to be extra magazines) tucked into his waistband when officers confronted him on the city’s South Side, reported Fox News.

The weapon can be clearly seen in the body cam footage. According to patrol chief Fred Waller, Augustus broke free and ran from the officers, who believed “he appeared to be reaching for a weapon” and shot him.

The video actually shows his hand on the weapon as if he were drawing it. The important piece of this footage is that the suspect did not have his back turned to police as if running away but in fact, had spun and was facing the officers as his hand went to his waistband.

Now, keep in mind, this small amount of footage is what they are using to refute larger amounts of footage from multiple angles that all say the same thing.

They pinned their hope of contesting police and witness accounts on a 3-second clip. And that comes after they criticize Chicago PD for editing the body camera footage to show only what they wanted it to show.

Police sent the handgun and two magazines of bullets for forensic testing, said police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi, who added that Augustus wasn’t a known gang member and had no recent arrest history.

Nevertheless, Augustus’ death sparked angry protests. As a result, four protesters were arrested after scuffles broke out; some officers suffered minor injuries from thrown rocks and bottles, some filled with urine. Officers were required to use force to include pulling people to the ground and using batons. Moreover, two squad cars were also damaged during the melee.

Johnson told reporters he ordered the footage released to address any misinformation about the shooting and maintain calm in a bid to avoid a repeat of Saturday’s unrest.

“If we expect neighborhoods to cooperate with police, we need to do our part to remain transparent,” Johnson said.

The article, entitled HOW CHICAGO POLICE CREATED A FALSE NARRATIVE AFTER OFFICERS KILLED HARITH AUGUSTUS, concludes that the dashboard camera video cannot prove anything.

In an ironic twist, it also claims in big, bold letters that “The Video Speaks for Itself.”

So, does the video speak for itself, or can it not prove anything definitively?

The piece also took a shot at the “this was all the police’s fault to begin with” argument. Stating, “Without any verbal warning and without probable cause to initiate an arrest, Officer Megan Fleming grabbed his arm from behind. Startled, he sought to break free and took several stumbling steps into the street.”

Yet the body cam footage shows differently. He did stumble, not because he was startled, but because he bounced off a car running into the street. And startled or not, he attempted to run from the police, who were actively questioning him at that time.

Add all of that up. You have a man who is carrying a concealed weapon (it was never reported whether he was licensed to carry the weapon), running from the police and reaching for that weapon during his attempt to evade.

Ignoring these facts, a group of architectural ‘experts’ partnered with some community activists (who claim they exist to hold the government accountable) for the sole purpose of disproving the police account in this particular officer involved shooting.

Here are some simple facts since the beginning of 2010 through August of 2018: 25,934 people were shot in Chicago. 78.9% of the shooting victims are black, 15.6% are Hispanic. Of those shootings, 337 were officer-involved (about 1.3% of all shootings).

Perhaps they should spend some time trying out how to solve the violent crimes plaguing that same city.

———

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  
 
Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!
 
Facebook Follow First

 

Share:
Related Posts